| Literature DB >> 32851085 |
Hui-Fang Li1, Qi-Hong Shen2, Xiao-Qing Li3, Zhang-Feng Feng4, Wei-Min Chen4, Jia-Hua Qian5, Li Shen6, Li-Ying Yu4, Yi Yang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Shoutai Pill (STP), a famous classic herbal formula documented in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), is widely available in China for treating unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion (URSA). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims at evaluating the efficacy and safety of STP in the first trimester of pregnancy in women with a history of unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32851085 PMCID: PMC7436282 DOI: 10.1155/2020/7495161
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1The inclusion process of literature.
The basic characteristics of the included studies.
| First author and year | Sample size ( | Age (y) | Gestational age (d) | TCM syndrome differentiation | Times of abortions ( | Definition of miscarriage | Definition of live birth | Intervention time | Intervention measures | Duration of intervention | Main outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guo 2018 | T: 54 | T: 28.54 ± 3.03 | T: NR | NR | T: 2.86 ± 0.71 | Pregnancy loss before 16 weeks | Delivery of a live infant after 28 weeks | NR | T: modified STP (1/dose/day) + C | Until miscarriage or the 16th weeks | ①②③ |
| He 2018 | T: 30 | T: 30.12 ± 2.22 | T: 52.2 ± 3.7 | Kidney deficiency and blood stasis | T: 2.6 ± 0.4 | Pregnancy loss before 12 weeks | Delivery of a live infant after 37 weeks | Pregnancy confirmed by | T: modified STP (1/dose/day) + C | 3 months | ①②③ |
| Huang 2016 | T: 31 | T: 27.77 ± 3.75 | T: 45.68 ± 2.36 | Spleen and kidney deficiency | T: 2.42 ± 0.62 | Pregnancy loss before 12 weeks | NR | Pregnancy confirmed by ultrasound | T: modified STP (1/dose/day) + C | 14 days | ① |
| Li 2017 | T: 42 | T: 27.52 ± 3.69 | T: 54.72 ± 4.96 | NR | T: 2.32 ± 1.61 | Pregnancy loss before 12 weeks | NR | Pregnancy confirmed by | T: modified STP (1/dose/day) + C | NR | ①③④ |
| Lu 2016 | T: 39 | T: 29.47 ± 2.05 | T: 47.32 ± 3.17 | NR | T: 2.83 ± 0.69 | Pregnancy loss before 20 weeks | NR | Pregnancy confirmed by ultrasound | T: modified STP (1/dose/day) + C | Until miscarriage or the 16th weeks | ①⑤ |
| Mo 2018 | T: 20 | T: 30.27 ± 3.41 | T: NR | Kidney deficiency and blood stasis | T: 2.57 ± 1.33 | NR | Delivery of a live infant after 37 weeks | Pregnancy confirmed by | T: modified STP (1/dose/day) + C | 7 days for a course of treatment | ②③④ |
| Tian 2019 | T: 40 | T: 27.88 ± 4.01 | T: NR | NR | T: 3.01 ± 0.69 | Pregnancy loss before 12 weeks | NR | Pregnancy confirmed by ultrasound | T: STP (1/dose/day) + C | Until miscarriage or more than the 12th weeks | ①③ |
| Wang 2016 | T: 75 | T: 31.7 ± 2.0 | T: 47.5 ± 3.9 | NR | T: NR | Pregnancy loss before 12 weeks | NR | Pregnancy confirmed by ultrasound | T: STP (1/dose/day) + C | Until miscarriage or the 12th weeks | ① |
| Wei 2017 | T: 30 | T: 27.69 ± 3.52 | T: 54.62 ± 4.95 | Kidney deficiency and blood stasis | T: 2.67 ± 1.58 | Pregnancy loss before 12 weeks | Delivery of a live infant after 37 weeks | Pregnancy confirmed by | T: modified STP (1/dose/day) + C | NR | ①②③④ |
| Xie 2016 | T: 36 | T: 30.5 ± 3.1 | T: 52.1 ± 3.6 | Kidney deficiency and blood stasis | T: 2.7 ± 0.3 | Pregnancy loss before 12 weeks | NR | NR | T: modified STP (1/dose/day) + C | 28 days | ①③④⑤ |
| Yuan 2015 | T: 40 | T: 27.8 ± 5.5 | T: NR | Kidney deficiency and blood stasis | T: 3.6 ± 1.2 | Pregnancy loss before 12 weeks | NR | Pregnancy confirmed by ultrasound | T: modified STP (1/dose/day) + C | Until miscarriage or the 12th weeks | ①⑤ |
| Zheng 2019 | T: 23 | T: 37.13 ± 4.45 | T: NR | NR | T: 3.03 ± 1.58 | Pregnancy loss before 28 weeks | Delivery of a live infant after 28 weeks | NR | T: STP (1/dose/day) + C | Until miscarriage or the 20th weeks | ①②③ |
T: trial group; C: control group; NR: not reported; ①: the incidence of early pregnancy loss; ②: the incidence of live birth; ③: TCM syndromes and symptoms; ④: serum D-dimer level; ⑤: adverse events.
Composition of prescription in the included studies.
| References | Prescription | Composition of prescription |
|---|---|---|
| Guo et al. 2018, [ | Modified STP | Chinese Dodder Seed 15 g, Chinese Taxillus Twig 15 g, Himalayan Teasel Root 10 g, |
| He et al. 2018, [ | Modified STP | Chinese Dodder Seed 30 g, Chinese Taxillus Twig 30 g, Himalayan Teasel Root 20 g, |
| Huang et al. 2016, [ | Modified STP | Chinese Dodder Seed 20 g, Chinese Taxillus Twig 20 g, Himalayan Teasel Root 20 g, Donkey-hide Glue 10 g, |
| Li et al. 2017, [ | Modified STP | Chinese Dodder Seed 30 g, Chinese Taxillus Twig 30 g, Himalayan Teasel Root 20 g, |
| Lu 2016, [ | Modified STP | Chinese Dodder Seed 15 g, Chinese Taxillus Twig 15 g, Himalayan Teasel Root 9 g, Donkey-hide Glue 12 g, Chinese Wolfberry 15 g, |
| Mo et al. 2018, [ | Modified STP | Chinese Dodder Seed 30 g, Chinese Taxillus Twig 30 g, Himalayan Teasel Root 20 g, Donkey-hide Glue 12 g, |
| Tian et al. 2019, [ | STP | Chinese Dodder Seed 15 g, Chinese Taxillus Twig 15 g, Himalayan Teasel Root 10 g, and Donkey-hide Glue 12 g |
| Wang et al. 2016, [ | STP | Chinese Dodder Seed 40 g, Chinese Taxillus Twig 20 g, Himalayan Teasel Root 20 g, and Donkey-hide Glue 20 g |
| Wei et al. 2017, [ | Modified STP | Chinese Dodder Seed 30 g, Chinese Taxillus Twig 30 g, Himalayan Teasel Root 20 g, Donkey-hide Glue 12 g, |
| Xie et al. 2016, [ | Modified STP | Chinese Dodder Seed 30 g, Chinese Taxillus Twig 30 g, Himalayan Teasel Root 20 g, Donkey-hide Glue 12 g, |
| Yuan et al. 2015, [ | Modified STP | Chinese Dodder Seed 30 g, Chinese Taxillus Twig 30 g, Himalayan Teasel Root 20 g, Donkey-hide Glue 12 g, |
| Zheng 2019, [ | STP | Chinese Dodder Seed 15 g, Chinese Taxillus Twig 15 g, Himalayan Teasel Root 15 g, and Root Donkey-hide Glue 15 g |
STP: Shoutai Pill.
Figure 2The risk of bias about each included study.
Figure 3Forest plot for the incidence of early pregnancy loss between combined and western alone medicine group.
Figure 4Subgroup analysis for early pregnancy loss rate based on the different types of TCM syndrome differentiation.
Figure 5Forest plot for TCM syndromes and symptoms between combined and western alone medicine group.
Figure 6Forest plot for serum D-dimer level between combined and western alone medicine group.
Figure 7Forest plot for live birth rate between combined and western alone medicine group.
Figure 8Sensitivity analysis for the early pregnancy loss rate.
The summary of GRADE evaluation.
| Outcomes | Participants (studies) | RR/SMD (95% CI) | GRADE | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The incidence of early pregnancy loss | 876 (11 RCTs) | 0.42 (0.34,0.52) | ⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate | “Risk of bias” was downgraded to “serious” |
| TCM syndromes and symptoms | 549 (8 RCTs) | -2.39 (-2.86, -10.93) | ⨁⨁◯◯ Low | “Risk of bias” was downgraded to “serious” |
| Serum D-dimer level | 256 (4 RCTs) | -0.25 (-0.30, -0.20) | ⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate | “Risk of bias” was downgraded to “serious” |
| Live birth rate | 313 (5 RCTs) | 1.81 (1.46, 2.25) | ⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate | “Risk of bias” was downgraded to “serious” |
RR: Risk Ratio; SMD: Standard Mean Difference; RCT: Random controlled trial.