| Literature DB >> 32850849 |
Andres Carmona1, Fatima Guerrero1,2, Maria Jose Jimenez1, Francisco Ariza1, Marisa L Agüera1,3, Teresa Obrero1, Victoria Noci4, Juan Rafael Muñoz-Castañeda1,3, Mariano Rodríguez1,2,3,5, Sagrario Soriano1,3,5, Juan Antonio Moreno1,6, Alejandro Martin-Malo1,2,3,5, Pedro Aljama1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) show a chronic microinflammatory state that promotes premature aging of the vascular system. Currently, there is a growth interest in the search of novel biomarkers related to vascular aging to identify CKD patients at risk to develop cardiovascular complications.Entities:
Keywords: chronic kidney disease; microRNAs; microvesicles; monocytes CD14+CD16++; vascular smooth muscle cells
Year: 2020 PMID: 32850849 PMCID: PMC7423998 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00739
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol ISSN: 2296-634X
Primer sequences used for RT-PCR.
| Gene simbol | Gene name | Forward | Reverse |
| BMP2 | Bone morphogenetic protein 2 | ||
| CycD1 | Cyclin D1 | ||
| GAPDH | Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase |
Demographic and biochemical characteristics of the 45 patients with chronic kidney disease included in the study.
| Elderly patients | CKD4-5 | Hemodialysis | Kidney Transplantation | |
| Number of patients/groups | 10 | 17 | 11 | 17 |
| Age, years | 80.2 ± 1.34&,*,# | 65.2 ± 2.7 | 58.0 ± 3.3 | 59.7 ± 2.4 |
| Gender (% male) | 30.0 | 47.0 | 63.6 | 41.2 |
| eGFR (ml/min/m2) | n.a. | 14.0 ± 1.7# | n.a. | 45.0 ± 4.0 |
| Creatinine, mg/dl | 0.8 ± 0.01&,* | 4.2 ± 0.3*,# | 8.3 ± 0.8 | 1.5 ± 0.1* |
| BUN, mg/dl | 19.1 ± 2.9&,* | 70.9 ± 5.5# | 60.8 ± 5.3 | 33.8 ± 2.8* |
| PTH, pg/ml | n.a. | 401.5 ± 63.1# | 589.1 ± 161.9 | 148.5 ± 39.9* |
| Phosphate, mg/dl | n.a. | 4.6 ± 0.4# | 4.2 ± 0.4 | 3.2 ± 0.1 |
| Hemoglobin, gr/dl | n.a. | 11.9 ± 0.4 | 12.4 ± 0.3 | 12.3 ± 0.3 |
| Albumin, gr/dl | n.a. | 4.2 ± 0.1* | 3.6 ± 0.1 | 4.2 ± 0.1* |
| Glucose, mg/dl | 113.1 ± 12.4 | 103.0 ± 5.4 | 111.8 ± 16.9 | 97.2 ± 6.0 |
| CRP, mg/l | n.a. | 6.9 ± 2.2 | 6.0 ± 2.4 | 4.8 ± 2.9 |
FIGURE 1Heat map of differentially expressed miRNAs from serum samples of CKD patients. Circulating miRNAs expression was downregulated in CKD4-5 and HD patients whereas was upregulated in KT patients. Red indicates downregulated miRNAs expression and green indicates upregulated miRNAs expression. n = 4 each group.
FIGURE 2Expression relative miRNAs levels in CKD patients and elderly subjects. The results are represented as the means ± SEM. Relative expression levels of circulating: (A) miRNA-126-3p; (B) miRNA-191-3p; (C) miRNA-223-3p; (D) miRNA-363-3p and (E) miRNA-495-3p are shown. The data were analyzed using an ANOVA test and Post hoc Bonferroni to evaluate statistical significance between groups. If the normality or equal variance test was violated, a comparison was made using the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U-test. p-value < 0.05 was considered on the borderline of statistical significance. *p < 0.03 vs. kidney transplantation.
FIGURE 3Comparison of miRNAs expression between the CKD4-5 and KT patients with a similar eGFR [“KT (CKD4-5 equivalent)]”, eGFR between 6 and 29 [ml/min/1.73m2]). (A) miRNA-126-3p, (B) miRNA-191-5p and (C) miRNA-223-3p. The data were analyzed using student’s t-test. Data are depicted as means ± SEM. p-value < 0.05 was considered on the borderline of statistical significance. *p ≤ 0.02.
FIGURE 4Selected 5 microRNA ratios were analyzed in the whole cohort, including 45 CKD patients and 10 elderly subjects. (A) miRNA-126-3p/miRNA-363-3p, (B) miRNA-223-3p/miRNA-363-3p, (C) miRNA-223-3p/miRNA-495-5p, (D) miRNA-191-5p/miRNA-363-3p and (E) miRNA-191-5p/miRNA-495-5p. The data were analyzed using an ANOVA test and Post hoc Bonferroni to evaluate statistical significance between groups. p-value < 0.05 was considered on the borderline of statistical significance. *p < 0.05 vs. CKD4-5; †p < 0.05 vs. kidney transplantation.
CD14+CD16++ and CD14+Annexin V+CD16+MV correlation analysis.
| Correlation coefficient | ||
| CD14+CD16++ vs. miRNA-126-3p/miRNA-363-3p | –0.63 | < 0.0001 |
| CD14+CD16++ vs. miRNA-223-3p/miRNA-363-3p | –0.53 | 0.0003 |
| CD14+CD16++ vs. miRNA-495-5p/miRNA-363-3p | –0.57 | < 0.0001 |
| CD14+CD16++ vs. miRNA-191-5p/miRNA-363-3p | –0.57 | < 0.0001 |
| CD14+Annexin V+CD16+MV vs. miRNA-126-3p/miRNA-495-5p | 0.48 | 0.005 |
| CD14+Annexin V+CD16+MV vs. miRNA-126-3p/miRNA-191-5p | –0.47 | 0.005 |
| CD14+Annexin V+CD16+MV vs. miRNA-223-3p/miRNA-495-5p | 0.45 | 0.01 |
| CD14+Annexin V+CD16+MV vs. miRNA-495-5p miRNA-363-3p | –0.42 | 0.01 |
| CD14+Annexin V+CD16+MV vs. miRNA-191-5p/miRNA-363-3p | –0.35 | 0.04 |
| CD14+Annexin V+CD16+MV vs. miRNA-495-5p/miRNA-191-5p | –0.60 | 0.0003 |
Blood leukocyte subpopulations of the 45 patients with chronic kidney disease.
| Elderly patients | CKD4-5 | Hemodialysis | Kidney Transplantation | |
| Leukocytes (103 per μ l) | 8.92 ± 0.97*,# | 8.15 ± 0.63*,# | 6.30 ± 0.93 | 5.83 ± 0.47 |
| Neutrophils (103 per μ l,%) | 6.62 ± 0.82 (74.22)*,# | 5.12 ± 0.53 (62.82) | 4.20 ± 0.88 (66.67) | 3.64 ± 0.35 (62.43) |
| Lymphocytes (103 per μ l,%) | 1.59 ± 0.26 (17.82) | 1.94 ± 0.24 (23.80) | 1.38 ± 0.10 (21.90) | 1.55 ± 0.16(26.59) |
| Eosinophils (103 per μ l,%) | 0.12 ± 0.03 (1.34)& | 0.30 ± 0.06 (3.68)*,# | 0.14 ± 0,03 (2.22) | 0.05 ± 0.02 (0.86)* |
| Monocytes (103 per μ l,%) | 0.46 ± 0.05 (5.15) | 0.54 ± 0.05 (6.62) | 0.38 ± 0.04 (6.03) | 0.40 ± 0.06 (6.86) |
| Basophils (103 per μl,%) | 0.03 ± 0.005 (0.33) | 0.04 ± 0.01 (0.49) | 0.03 ± 0.01 (0.48) | 0.05 ± 0.01 (0.86) |
FIGURE 5Representative flow cytometry monocytes subsets. The results are represented as the means ± SEM. Percentage of (A) CD14++ CD16-/dim and (B) CD14+CD16++ monocytes in elderly patients, CKD4-5, hemodialysis and kidney transplantation patients. The data were analyzed using an ANOVA test and Post hoc Bonferroni to evaluate statistical significance between groups. p-value < 0.05 was considered on the borderline of statistical significance. *p < 0.05 vs. all the groups.
FIGURE 6Representative histogram and quantification of microvesicles (MV/μl) in plasma by flow cytometry. The results are represented as the means ± SEM. (A) Number of microvesicles per microliter (Log Annexin V + MV) in elderly subjects, CKD4-5, hemodialysis and kidney transplantation patients. (B) Number of microvesicles per microliter (Log CD14 + Annexin V + MV) in elderly subjects, CKD4-5, hemodialysis and kidney transplantation patients. (C) Number of microvesicles per microliter (Log CD14 + Annexin V + CD16 + MV) in elderly patients, CKD4-5, hemodialysis and kidney transplantation patients. The data were analyzed using an ANOVA test and Post hoc Bonferroni to evaluate statistical significance between groups. p-value < 0.05 was considered on the borderline of statistical significance. *p ≤ 0.03 vs. elderly subjects; †p < 0.001vs. all groups.
FIGURE 7Correlation between proinflammatory monocytes (% CD14+CD16++) and microvesicles (Log CD14 + Annexin V + CD16 + MV).
FIGURE 8Microvesicles derived from uremic toxins-treated THP-1 induces senescence of vascular smooth muscle cells. Senescent-associated β-Gal activity staining of different of MV. (A–C) Representative images of inverted optical microscopy of the senescence studies of (A) control VSMC, (B) VSMC treated with cnMV and (C) txMV. (D) Quantification Total Area β-Gal/count and (E) Average size (μm) of β-Gal positive cells. (F) Expression level of cyclin D1was measured in VSMC. The data were analyzed using an ANOVA test and Post hoc Bonferroni to evaluate statistical significance between groups. If the normality or equal variance test was violated, a comparison was made using the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U-test. Data are the means ± SEM of six independent experiments. *p < 0.001 vs. VSMC; †p < 0.001 vs. VSMC + cnMV; ‡p = 0.009 vs. VSMC; #p = 0.015; &p = 0.01 vs. VSMC + cnMV.
FIGURE 9Expression levels of BMP2 and miRNA-223-3p in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC). Histogram of (A) BMP2 mRNA and (B) miRNA-223-3p levels were measured in VSMC. txMV induces differential expression of BMP2 and miRNA-223-3p in VSMC. The data were analyzed using an ANOVA test and Post hoc Bonferroni to evaluate statistical significance between groups. Data are the means ± SEM of six independent experiments. *p < 0.02 vs. VSMC.