Effects of Short-Term Hydroxychloroquine Plus Moxifloxacin Therapy on Corrected QT Interval and Tp-e Interval in Patients With COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available regarding hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and moxifloxacin (MOX) in patients with possible coronavirus disease 2019, (COVID-19). Both drugs may increase risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias associated with prolongation of QT interval.
METHODS: A total of 76 subjects with chest tomography findings compatible with COVID-19 pneumonia were enrolled in the study. Standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was repeated on days 2 and 5 in patients receiving a combination of HCQ + MOX. Heart rate, QT interval, Tp-e interval, and Tp-e/QT ratio were measured.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 61.7 ± 14.8 years and 54% had hypertension. Compared to day 2, ECG on day 5 showed significant increases in QT interval (370.8 ± 32.5 vs. 381.0 ± 29.3, respectively, P = 0.001), corrected QT (QTc) interval (424 (403 - 436) vs. 442 (420 - 468), respectively, P < 0.001), Tp-e interval (60 (55 - 70) vs. 65 (57 - 75), respectively, P < 0.001), cTp-e interval (72.2 ± 12.9 vs. 75.4 ± 12.7, respectively, P < 0.001). Moreover, a slight decrease in Tp-e/QT ratio was observed (0.17 ± 0.03 vs. 0.17 ± 0.02, P = 0.030). QTc was > 500 ms in 5% of the patients, and 8% of patients had an increase in QTc interval > 60 ms. Tp-e/QT ratio was > 0.23 in 4% of patients. Five patients died due to pulmonary failure without evidence of ventricular arrhythmia. No ventricular arrhythmia events, including torsades de pointes (TdP), were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: HCQ + MOX combination therapy led to increases in QTc interval, Tp-e interval, and cTp-e interval. However, this therapy did not cause ventricular arrhythmia in the short-term observation. Copyright 2020, Afsin et al.

Introduction

A pneumonia epidemic, which is considered to have developed due to a new coronavirus, was detected in Wuhan, Hubei province, the People’s Republic of China, in 2019, which could not be brought under control and spread around the world within a short time causing a pandemic [1]. The etiological agent has been reported to be novel coronavirus-2019 (2019-nCoV) belonging to the Coronaviridae family, which the World Health Organization (WHO) subsequently named serious acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and the associated disease was named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) [2, 3].

Various agents considered to be effective in the treatment of COVID-19 have been used since the beginning of the pandemic. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) are quinine-derived drugs that have long been used in the treatment and prophylaxis of malaria and chronic rheumatic diseases. Chloroquine and HCQ have been reported to be effective in many in vitro experiments against viruses, including SARS-CoV-2 [4]. In addition, clinical studies conducted in China demonstrated that chloroquine had marked efficacy against COVID-19-associated pneumonia and acceptable safety [5]. In a small-scale study conducted in France, HCQ was reported to be effective in the treatment of COVID-19, and its efficacy was also suggested to be increased when administered along with azithromycin (AZ) [6]. However, HCQ can extend the QT interval and increase the risk of torsades de pointes (TdP). Moxifloxacin (MOX), from the fluoroquinolone group, is a broad-spectrum antibiotic widely used in atypical pneumonia. MOX has also been reported to extend the QT interval and cause TdP [7].

The QT interval measured on 12-channel electrocardiogram (ECG) shows regional heterogeneity of ventricular repolarization. The time from the peak of the T wave to the end point (Tp-e) measured on ECG indicates the global dispersion of ventricular repolarization [8]. Studies have shown that increases in both regional and global ventricular repolarization heterogeneity predispose the patient to cardiac arrhythmia [9].

Although HCQ and MOX are well-tolerated drugs commonly used in clinical practice, both can cause prolongation of corrected QT (QTc). There are insufficient data in the literature on whether prolongation of QT and Tp-e intervals can occur when HCQ and MOX are used together in the treatment of possible SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Drug-induced QT prolongation is an important measure of drug safety as it is associated with increased mortality. This study was performed to evaluate QT and Tp-e intervals, which are ventricular repolarization parameters measured on 12-lead superficial ECG to predict ventricular arrhythmia, in cases of possible COVID-19 with negative results on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test receiving a combination of HCQ and MOX.

Materials and Methods

Study population

We analyzed the data of patients who presented to our hospital and were diagnosed with suspected COVID-19 between March and April 2020. A total of 55 consecutive subjects with chest computed tomography (CT) findings compatible with COVID-19 pneumonia were enrolled in the study. Diagnosis of COVID-19 was made according to the WHO interim guidelines [10]. HCQ treatment (400 mg twice daily for 1 day, followed by 200 mg twice daily for 4 days) was determined as 5 days according to the guideline published by the Ministry of Health, Republic of Turkey [11] and MOX (400 mg infused once daily for > 5 days) were started as empirical treatment in patients with a possible diagnosis of COVID-19.

MOX treatment was discontinued in COVID-19 cases confirmed by the PCR test. Therefore, confirmed cases of COVID-19 were excluded from the study. Patients who were using medications that could affect QRS, QT, and Tp-e intervals, including tricyclic antidepressants, antihistamines, and antipsychotics, those with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, those with a previously known branch or atrioventricular (AV) nodal block, and those with a negative and/or biphasic T wave on their ECG were also excluded. Those with a heart rate < 60 beats/min or > 110 beats/min, and those with congenital long QT syndrome were also excluded. Finally, noncardiac exclusion criteria were pregnancy and breast-feeding.

Study protocol

All patients presenting to the emergency department or outpatient clinic underwent complete medical assessment, physical examination, laboratory investigation, and CT of the chest. Epidemiological, clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings were obtained from the electronic medical records and noted in data collection forms.

Blood samples were obtained from the cephalic vein by traumatic venipuncture and mixed with EDTA on hospital admission. Complete white blood cell counts, including neutrophils and lymphocytes, were measured using an automated hematology analyzer (CELL-DYN Ruby; Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL) and expressed as ×103 cells/mm3. Hemoglobin and platelet counts were also calculated. Glucose, creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, bilirubin, sodium, potassium, calcium, ferritin, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were analyzed using an Architect c8000 Chemistry System (Abbott Diagnostics) with commercial kits (Abbott Diagnostics). Troponin I and D-dimer assay levels were analyzed using an immunoassay analyzer (AQT90 FLEX; Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark).

The chest CT findings were as follows [12]: multiple, patchy, sub-segmental or segmental/lobar ground-glass opacity in unilateral/bilateral lungs; multiple, patchy, or large patches of consolidation in unilateral/bilateral lungs, with slight grid-like or honeycomb-shaped interlobular septal thickening, especially in the middle and lower lobes.

In addition, nasopharyngeal swab samples were collected by professional healthcare personnel in a special sampling room.

The ECG recordings of the patients were acquired from telemetric monitors or a standard 12-lead ECG device. Rhythm recordings were obtained from telemetric monitors (IntelliVue MP5; Philips, Hamburg, Germany) using 25 mm/s as the flow rate of the telemetric device and standard derivation (DII derivation) [13].

The 12-lead ECG recordings (25 mm/s, 10 mm/mV) were obtained in the supine position using a CardioFax S device (Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan). Resting heart rate was measured using the ECG data. QT and Tp-e intervals were calculated manually by two cardiologists using the ECG data. Calipers and magnifying glasses were used to reduce measurement errors. The QT interval was calculated as the time from the start of the QRS complex to the end of the T wave. The Tp-e interval was measured as the time from the T wave peak to the T wave end point. The measurements were performed on lead II and lead V5, and the longest QT and Tp-e intervals were used for the analyses [14]. The measured values were corrected according to the heart rate using Bazett’s formula. QTc interval and corrected Tp-e interval (cTp-e) were obtained, and the ratios of Tp-e/QT and corrected Tp-e/QT (Tp-e/QTc) were calculated. The interobserver and intraobserver variation coefficients for the Tp-e/QT ratio were 2.7% and 3.1%, respectively, and those for the Tp-e/QTc ratio were 2.7% and 3.0%, respectively. In addition, the Tisdale score was calculated to evaluate the risk of QTc prolongation. The 12-lead ECG was repeated on days 2 and 5 in patients receiving a combination of HCQ + MOX.

This study was conducted in compliance with the ethical standards of the responsible institution on human subjects as well as with the Helsinki Declaration. Research ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Adiyaman University Medical Faculty (approval number: 2020/6-9).

Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Categorical variables are presented as numbers and percentages. Continuous variables were tested for normality of the distribution normality with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Continuous variables are presented as the mean ± standard deviation or median (25th - 75th interquartile range) and were compared using the paired t-test if the data were normally distributed and Wilcoxon’s rank sum test if the data were not normally distributed. Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation methods were applied for relationship analysis. In all analyses, P < 0.05 was taken to indicate statistical significance.

Results

A total of 238 patients were eligible for the study. Patients with ECGs that could not be analyzed (n = 10), patients with branch block in ECG (n = 5), COVID-19 patients with a positive PCR test (n = 47), and those without follow-up ECG (n = 40) were excluded. In addition, patients with a hospitalization period < 5 days (n = 60) were also excluded. The remaining 76 patients were included in the study.

The demographic findings and comorbidities of the study group are shown in Table 1. The mean age of the patients was 61.7± 14.8, and 44 (58%) were women. The most common comorbidity in patients was hypertension (54%), followed by diabetes mellitus (34%), and chronic lung disease (28%). Five patients died during their hospital stay due to pulmonary failure without evidence of ventricular arrhythmia. The laboratory parameters of the patients at the time of presentation are shown in Table 2.

Table 1

Demographic Features and Comorbidities of Patients on Admission (N = 76)

Baseline characteristics	N (%)
Sex
Female	44 (58%)
Male	32 (42%)
Age (years)	61.7 ± 14.8
Smoking	11 (15%)
Comorbidities
Heart failure	13 (17%)
Hypertension	41 (54%)
Coronary artery disease	21 (28%)
Cerebrovascular disease	2 (2%)
Diabetes mellitus	26 (34%)
Chronic lung diseasea	21 (28%)
Atrial fibrillation	2 (2%)
Malignancy	1 (1%)
Chronic kidney disease	5 (7%)
Death without cardiac arrhythmia	5 (7%)

aChronic lung disease was defined as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, or chronic bronchitis.

Table 2

Laboratory Findings of Patients on Admission to Hospital (N = 76)

Hemoglobin, g/dL	12.9 ± 1.8
Platelet count, (× 103/µL)	215 (180 - 258)
White blood cell count, (× 103/µL)	9.1 ±3.8
Neutrophil cell count, (× 103/µL)	6.4 ± 3.4
Lymphocyte cell count, (× 103/µL)	1.9 ± 0.9
Serum creatinine, mg/dL	0.85 (0.72 - 1.07)
Alanine aminotransferase, U/L	22 (16 - 34)
Lactate dehydrogenase, U/L	321.6 ± 114.4
Serum potassium, mEq/L	4.3 ± 0.2
Serum sodium, mEq/L	136.2 ± 2.4
C-reactive protein, mg/dL	3.2 (0.6 - 8.5)
Ferritin, ng/mL	118 (52 - 220)
D-dimer, µg/L	907 (698 - 1,130)
Troponin I, ng/mL	0.01 (0.01 - 0.03)
Activated partial thromboplastin time, s	32.7 ± 5.0
Prothrombin time, s	1.2 ± 0.3
Ph	7.37 ± 0.06
ΔQTc, ms	15 (3 - 38)
Tisdale score	7.3 ± 1.1
Systolic BP, mm Hg	130.1 ± 14.1
Diastolic BP, mm Hg	80 (70 - 85)

ΔQTc: change in corrected QT interval; BP: blood pressure.

Table 3 presents the ECG parameters of the study group. There was no statistically significant change in heart rate during follow-up. ECG showed statistically significant increases in QT interval (370.8 ± 32.5 vs. 381.0 ± 29.3, respectively, P = 0.001), QTc interval (424 (403 - 436) vs. 442 (420 - 468), respectively, P < 0.001), Tp-e interval (60 (55 - 70) vs. 65 (57 - 75), respectively, P < 0.001), and cTp-e interval (72.2 ± 12.9 vs. 75.4 ± 12.7, respectively, P < 0.001) on day 5 compared to day 2. Furthermore, the ratio of Tp-e/QT (0.17 ± 0.03 vs. 0.17 ± 0.02, respectively, P = 0.030) was decreased significantly from day 2 to day 5.

Table 3

Electrocardiographic Parameters of the Study Group (N = 76)

	2nd day	5th day	P
Heart rate (beats/min)	78 (72 - 90)	80 (73 - 90)	0.127
QT interval (ms)	370.8 ± 32.5	381.0 ± 29.3	0.001
QTc interval (ms)	424 (403 - 436)	442 (420 - 468)	< 0.001
Tp-e interval (ms)	60 (55 - 70)	65 (57 - 75)	< 0.001
cTp-e interval (ms)	72.2 ± 12.9	75.4 ± 12.7	< 0.001
Tp-e/QT ratio	0.17 ± 0.03	0.17 ± 0.02	0.03
Tp-e/QTc ratio	0.17 ± 0.03	0.17 ± 0.03	0.228

QTc: corrected QT; Tp-e: transmural dispersion of repolarization; cTp-e: corrected transmural dispersion of repolarization.

In clinical follow-up, four (5%) patients had QTc > 500 ms, while 10 (8%) had an increase in QTc interval > 60 ms. Three (4%) patients had Tp-e/QT ratio > 0.23. No atrial arrhythmia and ventricular arrhythmia events, including TdP, were observed in any patient (Table 4). In addition, five patients had nausea without vomiting due to HCQ side effects. Three patients had dizziness due to MOX therapy.

Table 4

Increased Ventricular Arrhythmia Risk and Adverse Events in Study Population (N = 76)

	N	%	Mean ± SD
5th day with QTc interval > 500 ms	4	5	516.3 ± 13.2
Increase in the QTc interval of > 60 ms	10	8	70.4 ± 12.4
Tp-e interval ≥ 110 ms	0	0	-
cTp-e interval ≥ 110 ms	0	0	-
Tp-e/QT ratio > 0.23	3	4	0.24 ± 0.07
Tp-e/QTc ratio > 0.23	0	0	-
Atrial arrhythmia	0	0	-
Torsades de pointes	0	0	-
Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia	0	0	-
Sustained ventricular tachycardia	0	0	-

QTc: corrected QT; Tp-e: transmural dispersion of repolarization; cTp-e: corrected transmural dispersion of repolarization; SD: standard deviation.

Age and troponin I showed significant positive relations with QTc interval (r = 0.305, P = 0.007; r = 0.318, P = 0.005, respectively). D-dimer showed also significant positive correlations with cTp-e interval (r = 0.347, P = 0.002) and Tp-e/QTc ratio (r = 0.339, P = 0.003). The correlations between ECG and clinical parameters are presented in Table 5.

Table 5

Correlations Between the Fifth Day Electrocardiography and Clinical Parameters

	QTc interval		cTp-e interval		Tp-e/QTc ratio
	r	P	r	P	r	P
Age, (years)	0.305	0.007*	-0.118	0.310	-0.003	0.978
WBC, 103/µL	-0.003	0.977	-0.071	0.543	-0.080	0.493
Neutrophil, 103/µL	0.013	0.914	-0.080	0.492	-0.094	0.418
Lymphocyte, 103/µL	-0.062	0.594	-0.053	0.648	-0.038	0.745
Platelet, 103/µL	0.180	0.190	-0.092	0.427	-0.162	0.162
Ferritin, ng/mL	0.045	0.701	0.150	0.196	0.146	0.209
D-dimer, µg/L	0.213	0.064	0.347	0.002*	0.339	0.003*
Troponin I, ng/mL	0.318	0.005*	0.106	0.441	-0.079	0.567
CRP, mg/L	0.016	0.891	0.001	0.991	0.002	0.985

*P < 0.05. WBC: white blood cell count; CRP: C-reactive protein.

Discussion

We evaluated the ECG parameters showing heterogeneity of ventricular repolarization in patients with possible COVID-19 pneumonia receiving HCQ + MOX therapy. Our results showed that QTc increased from a mean baseline of 424 ms to a maximum of 442 ms after 5 days, with approximately 5% of the patients developing QTc > 500 ms. There was also increase in the cTp-e interval from 72 ms to 75 ms. No ventricular arrhythmia and atrial arrhythmia events were observed.

Long QT syndromes are cardiac repolarization disorders characterized by prolonged QT interval on ECG. These repolarization disorders can lead to rapid polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, known as TdP, syncope, or sudden cardiac death. MOX, a member of the fluoroquinolone group, is now widely used in treatment of atypical pneumonia and can result in acquired long QT syndrome. MOX blocks the rapid activating delayed rectifier potassium current (IKr) encoded by the human ether-a-go-go-related gene (HERG) in a dose-dependent manner, thereby causing the prolongation of the QT interval and TdP [15].

It has been known for many years that HCQ has antiviral activity. There have been a number of studies on the effectiveness of both HCQ alone and HCQ + AZ combination in COVID-19. Discussion continues in the medical community regarding the effectiveness of HCQ in the treatment of COVID-19. In vitro and preliminary clinical studies have shown that the use of HCQ alone or in combination with AZ is useful in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2. However, these clinical trials usually consisted of a small number of patients [6, 16]. In a study including 1,061 patients, Million et al [17] reported that the combination of HCQ and AZ was safe to administer in patients before the development of COVID-19 complications and was associated with a very low mortality rate. In contrast, other groups have stated that HCQ is not effective in the treatment of COVID-19. For example, in an observational study in 1,367 patients with COVID-19, Geleris et al reported that HCQ administration was not associated with either lowered or increased risk of the composite end point of intubation or death [18].

Due to its immunomodulatory characteristics, HCQ has been used for a long time in treatment of autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus, and its cardiovascular safety is good [19]. Moreover, information about cardiac side effects of HCQ is limited to a few case reports. Adverse events, such as prolonged QRS, prolonged QT interval, TdP, and ventricular arrhythmia, have been observed in individuals receiving HCQ due to autoimmune diseases [20, 21]. Chloroquine causes prolonged QT by increasing the ventricular myocardial action potential, by affecting Na+ and Ca2+ channels involved in depolarization, IKr channels involved in repolarization and, especially, inward rectifier K+ current (IK1 current), which stabilizes the resting membrane potential [15, 22]. The value of the QT interval for predicting TdP risk is low, but risk is known to be greater when QT > 550 ms [23]. However, case reports and small patient series with drug-induced TdP have shown that QTc exceeding the 500 ms threshold or > 60 ms prolongation in QTc compared to baseline ECG are associated with increased cardiac risk [24]. Therefore, when using two or more drugs that prolong QTc in combination, in the treatment of COVID-19, there are concerns about cardiac arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death related to prolonged QT.

The preliminary safety results of a randomized, double-blind, phase IIb clinical trial (CloroCovid-19 Study) comparing the use of chloroquine at a high dose (a total dose of 12,000 mg over 10 days) and a low dose (a total dose of 2,700 mg over 5 days) in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 have been published. The outcome of the first 81 patients in the high-dose chloroquine arm showed a higher rate of QTc > 500 ms (25%) and a trend toward higher lethality (17%) compared to those given the lower dose [25]. Therefore, the researchers stopped enrolling patients in the high-dose chloroquine arm. In addition, HCQ is less toxic than chloroquine and, according to in vitro studies, the former is three times more potent than the latter [26].

There have been a number of clinical studies to address the safety of the HCQ + AZ combination in COVID-19 patients, and no serious cardiac toxicity was observed in these studies [27-30]. In a clinical study of 84 COVID-19 patients treated with a combination of HCQ + AZ, the results indicated that 11% of patients had QTc > 500 ms and new development of acute renal failure was a strong predictor of extreme QT prolongation, while the baseline QTc was not a predictor of severe QTc prolongation [27]. In a study of 201 patients, Saleh et al [28] reported that the maximum QTc was 470 ms in patients who received combined HCQ + AZ treatment and 453 ms in those undergoing monotherapy. The authors did not observe any ventricular arrhythmia. In a population of 90 patients who tested positive for COVID-19 by PCR, Mercuro et al [29] treated 37 patients with HCQ and 53 patients with the combination of HCQ + AZ. Seven of the 37 patients receiving HCQ alone and 11 of the 53 patients receiving combination therapy had prolonged QTc ≥ 500 ms. Furthermore, one patient who received the combination therapy developed TdP. In a study performed in 40 patients with a positive PCR test, Bessiere et al [30] reported that the number of patients with QTc ≥ 500 ms was higher in the HCQ + AZ combination group, but they did not detect any ventricular arrhythmia.

In this study, while only four cases had QTc interval > 500 ms, 10 patients had prolongation of QTc > 60 ms in comparison with the previous ECG. In addition, no ventricular arrhythmia, including Tdp, was observed during the follow-up of these patients. We observed a similar risk of arrhythmia in patients with a positive PCR test who received HCQ + AZ combination therapy compared to several previous studies. The absence of malignant ventricular arrhythmias may have played a major role in the short duration of treatment. Our study showed that this combination therapy can be administered safely in COVID-19 patients with close ECG monitoring. Randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate the effects of HCQ + MOX combination on QT interval.

Numerous experimental and clinical studies have reported the poor performance of QT interval for demonstrating proarrhythmic sensitivity [31, 32]. As the T wave shows ventricular repolarization on ECG, studies have also investigated the relationship between drug-induced arrhythmia and changes in T wave morphology. It has been reported that ECG parameters, such as the Tp-e interval and Tp-e/QT ratio, reflect the transmural dispersion of repolarization and show better repolarization heterogeneity than the QT interval. It has been reported that increases in Tp-e interval and Tp-e/QT ratio indicate increased dispersion of repolarization, which is predictive of ventricular arrhythmia and cardiovascular death [8, 33]. In addition, Tp-e and QT interval have been reported to be affected by body mass index and heart rate, while the Tp-e/QT ratio is unaffected by these factors, and it is more sensitive for predicting ventricular arrhythmia [34]. While the normal range of Tp-e interval is 40 - 110 ms, that of the Tp-e/QT ratio has been reported to be 0.17 - 0.23 [35, 36]. In a recent meta-analysis, Tse et al [35] reported that the Tp-e intervals were longer and the Tp-e/QT ratios were higher in patients showing adverse events, such as Tdp, than in those without such events among those with acquired QT prolongation. In subgroup analysis of the study, they found that the Tp-e interval was 149 ± 16 ms and the Tp-e/QT ratio was 0.27 ± 0.05 in patients who developed cardiac events in the drug-induced long QT syndrome. Topilski et al [36] reported that Tp-e interval ≥ 117 ms was associated with ventricular arrhythmia. Yamaguchi et al [37] determined that in patients with acquired long QT syndrome, Tp-e/QT ratio > 0.28 increased the risk of TdP.

The effects of HCQ on Tp-e interval and Tp-e/QT ratio remain unclear. Taubel et al [38] reported that MOX caused prolongation of Tp-e interval. In the present study, we found that patients had increased Tp-e and cTp-e intervals and Tp-e/QT ratio during follow-up. On day 5 of follow-up, none of the patients had Tp-e or cTp-e interval ≥ 110 ms, and the increases in these intervals were within the respective normal range. Three patients had Tp-e/QT ratio > 0.23, and the Tp-e/QT ratio of these patients increased only slightly. There were no patients with cTp-e/QT ratio > 0.23. Our results showed that short-term doses (5 days) of HCQ + MOX combination therapy were accompanied by slight increases in Tp-e interval and cTp-e interval, which were not related to ventricular arrhythmia. In addition, the evaluation of these parameters with QTc may be more valuable in predicting drug-induced ventricular arrhythmia. Randomized controlled studies are required to validate the results and determine the cut-off values for Tp-e interval and Tp-e/QT ratio in predicting drug-induced ventricular arrhythmia.

There have been a number of reports regarding the monitoring and management of QT prolongation caused by HCQ in SARS-CoV-2. Some groups have suggested that a baseline ECG should be performed in all patients and repeat ECGs should be performed during the period of hospitalization, while others recommend ECG monitoring only in high-risk patients [39]. Our study showed that ECG monitoring once or twice is sufficient.

This study has several limitations. This was a retrospective and observational study conducted in a single center with a small number of patients. Use of a Holter monitor for follow-up of QTc and cTp-e intervals might have been useful in determining cardiac arrhythmia in these patients. However, the risk of COVID-19 complicates this procedure. Duration of the combination therapy was limited to 5 days in this study. However, longer combination therapy is more useful to determine its adverse effects. Tisdale score was calculated based on the ECG results from day 2 and not the basal ECG.

Conclusions

The results of this study showed that in possible COVID-19 pneumonia patients, HCQ + MOX combination therapy led to increases in QTc and cTp-e intervals; however, short-term HCQ + MOX combination therapy did not cause ventricular arrhythmia. Nevertheless, the possibility that dysrhythmic activity may increase synergistically with the use of this drug combination should always be taken into consideration. To evaluate the risk of ventricular arrhythmia in the treatment of COVID-19 patients, it may be safer and more appropriate to evaluate the QTc and cTp-e intervals together with the Tp-e/QTc ratio. Due to the risk of infection, it may be sufficient to perform ECG monitoring on days 2 and 5 rather than daily during the follow-up of COVID-19 patients.