| Literature DB >> 32849941 |
Toshihiro Higashikawa1,2, Tomohiko Ito1, Takurou Mizuno1, Keiichiro Ishigami1, Masaru Kohori1, Kunihiro Mae1, Daisuke Usuda1, Kento Takeshima1, Susumu Takagi1, Toshihide Izumida1, Shinya Yamada1, Kengo Kuroki1, Ryusho Sangen1, Atsushi Saito1, Masaharu Iguchi1, Yuji Kamasaki1, Takeshi Nakahashi2, Akihiro Fukuda1, Tsugiyasu Kanda1, Masashi Okuro2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are at increased risk for impairment in heart failure and diastolic relaxation while preserving ejection fraction (EF). Recently, several sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have demonstrated to decrease cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in elderly diabetic patients, although gender difference in the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors is unknown. The objective of the present study was to evaluate gender difference in the effect of tofogliflozin, one of the SGLT2 inhibitors, on CVD function in patients with diabetes mellitus.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetes mellitus; E/A; E/e'; EF; Elderly; Tofogliflozin
Year: 2020 PMID: 32849941 PMCID: PMC7430877 DOI: 10.14740/jocmr4278
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med Res ISSN: 1918-3003
Characteristics of the Patients
| Variable | Men (N = 24) | Women (N = 32) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 80.2 ± 6.4 | 83.1 ± 6.4 |
| BMI | 23.1 ± 3.3 | 23.0 ± 3.5 |
| NYHA I/II (III, IV: none) | 22/2 | 28/2 |
| Co-administered drug | ||
| DPP-4 | 14 | 23 |
| BG | 7 | 11 |
| SU | 5 | 3 |
| Insulin | 0 | 0 |
| ARB | 6 | 6 |
| β-blocker | 5 | 4 |
| CCB | 10 | 17 |
| Diuretics | 4 | 13 |
BMI: body mass index; NYHA: New York Heart Association; DPP-4: dipeptidyl peptidase-4; BG: biguanide; SU: sulphonylurea; ARB: angiotensin II receptor blocker; CCB: calcium channel blocker.
Characteristics of Laboratory Test Results
| Variable | Baseline | 1 month | 3 months | P-value* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HbA1c (%) | 7.4 ± 1.3 | 7.0 ± 1.0 | 6.7 ± 0.8 | < 0.01 |
| Body weight (kg) | 54.6 ± 10.9 | 52.5 ± 10.5 | 51.8 ± 10.1 | < 0.01 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 138.4 ± 24.5 | 125.3 ± 16.9 | 128.0 ± 20.1 | < 0.01 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 72.0 ± 13.8 | 70.5 ± 11.5 | 72.5 ± 12.6 | 0.81 |
| Hematocrit | 37.9 ± 6.9 | 38.4 ± 5.9 | 38.4 ± 5.9 | 0.3 |
| BNP (pg/mL) | 222.8 ± 378.5 | 149.6 ± 240.2 | 186.8 ± 270.6 | 0.11 |
| eGFR | 60.5 ± 23.2 | 58.2 ± 24.3 | 59.3 ± 28.4 | 0.54 |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 19.9 ± 9.9 | 19.7 ± 7.2 | 19.5 ± 7.8 | 0.74 |
| Na+ (mEq/L) | 138.8 ± 3.5 | 139.5 ± 3.0 | 140.5 ± 3.3 | < 0.01 |
| K+ (mEq/L) | 4.2 ± 0.6 | 4.2 ± 0.5 | 4.2 ± 0.5 | 0.78 |
| Cl- (mEq/L) | 102.5 ± 12.2 | 104.4 ± 5.0 | 106.0 ± 3.3 | < 0.05 |
| Blood osmotic pressure (mOsm/L) | 292.8 ± 7.2 | 292.6 ± 7.3 | 295.1 ± 7.1 | < 0.05 |
*Paired t-test compared to baseline with 3 months after administration. HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin; BNP: brain natriuretic peptide; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; BUN: blood urea nitrogen.
Characteristics of Laboratory Test Results
| Variable | Baseline | 1 month | 3 months | P-value* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EF | 64.5 ± 8.9 | 62.3 ± 10.6 | 63.3 ± 9.3 | 0.25 |
| E/A | 0.69 ± 0.32 | 0.60 ± 0.18 | 0.62 ± 0.17 | 0.31 |
| E/e' | 11.7 ± 3.9 | 9.9 ± 2.9 | 10.1 ± 3.9 | < 0.05 |
| LAD (mm) | 38.8 ± 6.8 | 37.4 ± 6.7 | 37.6 ± 6.4 | 0.19 |
| IVCmax (mm) | 13.7 ± 3.5 | 13.5 ± 3.7 | 13.7 ± 3.6 | 0.61 |
*Paired t-test compared to baseline with 3 months after administration. EF: ejection fraction; E/A: early filling/atrial filling; E/e': change in inflow E and mitral e' annular velocities; LAD: left atrial dimension; IVCmax: maximal diameter of inferior vena cava.
Results of Two-Factor Mixed Effect Model to Evaluate Effects and Interaction of EF
| SOV | df | Sum sq. | Mean sq. | F | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time | 2 | 125.1 | 62.5 | 2.4 | 0.10 |
| Subjects | 52 | 10,305.0 | 198.2 | 7.5 | < 0.01 |
| Gender | 1 | 1,796.5 | 1,796.5 | 9.1 | < 0.01 |
| Time × gender | 2 | 81.1 | 40.5 | 1.5 | 0.22 |
| Error | 105 | 2,760.2 | 26.3 | ||
| Total | 162 | 15,067.8 |
Analysis of variance table for the mixed effects model. EF: ejection fraction; SOV: source of variance; df: degree of freedom; Sum sq.: sum of squares; Mean sq.: mean squares; F: F statistic.
Figure 1Interaction plot in EF between time and gender. EF: ejection fraction.
Results of Two-Factor Mixed Effect Model to Evaluate Effects and Interaction of E/A
| SOV | df | Sum sq. | Mean sq. | F | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time | 2 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 2.7 | 0.07 |
| Subjects | 35 | 2.6 | 0.1 | 8.9 | < 0.01 |
| Gender | 1 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.7 | 0.40 |
| Time × gender | 2 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 7.2 | < 0.01 |
| Error | 105 | 0.87 | 0.01 | ||
| Total | 162 | 3.7 |
Analysis of variance table for the mixed effects model. E/A: early filling/atrial filling; SOV: source of variance; Sum sq.: sum of squares; df: degree of freedom; Mean sq.: mean squares; F: F statistic.
Figure 2Interaction plot in E/A between time and gender. E/A: early filling/atrial filling.
Results of two-factor mixed effect model to evaluate effects and interaction of E/e'
| SOV | df | Sum sq. | Mean sq. | F | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time | 2 | 60.9 | 30.5 | 11.5 | < 0.01 |
| Subjects | 52 | 1012.9 | 19.5 | 7.4 | < 0.01 |
| Gender | 1 | 36.9 | 36.9 | 1.9 | 0.17 |
| Time × gender | 2 | 11.1 | 5.6 | 2.1 | 0.13 |
| Error | 105 | 277.3 | 2.6 | ||
| Total | 162 | 1,399.1 |
Analysis of variance table for the mixed effects model. E/e': change in inflow E and mitral e' annular velocities; SOV: source of variance; Sum sq.: sum of squares; df: degree of freedom; Mean sq.: mean squares; F: F statistic.
Figure 3Interaction plot in E/e' between time and gender. E/e': change in inflow E and mitral e' annular velocities.