Literature DB >> 32849920

Does Benefit Framing Improve Record Linkage Consent Rates? A Survey Experiment.

Joseph W Sakshaug1, Jens Stegmaier2, Mark Trappmann3, Frauke Kreuter4.   

Abstract

Survey researchers are increasingly seeking opportunities to link interview data with administrative records. However, obtaining consent from all survey respondents (or certain subgroups) remains a barrier to performing record linkage in many studies. We experimentally investigated whether emphasizing different benefits of record linkage to respondents in a telephone survey of employee working conditions improves respondents' willingness to consent to linkage of employment administrative records relative to a neutral consent request. We found that emphasizing linkage benefits related to "time savings" yielded a small, albeit statistically significant, improvement in the overall linkage consent rate (86.0) relative to the neutral consent request (83.8 percent). The time savings argument was particularly effective among "busy" respondents. A second benefit argument related to "improved study value" did not yield a statistically significant improvement in the linkage consent rate (84.4 percent) relative to the neutral request. This benefit argument was also ineffective among the subgroup of respondents considered to be most likely to have a self-interest in the study outcomes. The article concludes with a brief discussion of the practical implications of these findings and offers suggestions for possible research extensions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  administrative data; framing; interviewer-respondent interaction; questionnaire design; telephone survey

Year:  2019        PMID: 32849920      PMCID: PMC7447194     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surv Res Methods        ISSN: 1864-3361


  5 in total

1.  Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation: description and an illustration.

Authors:  R M Groves; E Singer; A Corning
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Informed consent for record linkage: a systematic review.

Authors:  Márcia Elizabeth Marinho da Silva; Cláudia Medina Coeli; Miriam Ventura; Marisa Palacios; Mônica Maria Ferreira Magnanini; Thais Medina Coeli Rochel Camargo; Kenneth Rochel Camargo
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Design and estimation for the national health interview survey, 2006-2015.

Authors:  Van L Parsons; Chris Moriarity; Kimball Jonas; Thomas F Moore; Karen E Davis; Linda Tompkins
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 2       Date:  2014-04

4.  The Effect of Framing and Placement on Linkage Consent.

Authors:  Joseph W Sakshaug; Alexandra Schmucker; Frauke Kreuter; Mick P Couper; Eleanor Singer
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2019-06-20

5.  Data Resource Profile: Panel Study Labour Market and Social Security (PASS).

Authors:  Mark Trappmann; Sebastian Bähr; Jonas Beste; Andreas Eberl; Corinna Frodermann; Stefanie Gundert; Stefan Schwarz; Nils Teichler; Stefanie Unger; Claudia Wenzig
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 7.196

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.