Literature DB >> 32849655

Combating COVID-19: MVA Vector Vaccines Applied to the Respiratory Tract as Promising Approach Toward Protective Immunity in the Lung.

Reinhold Förster1,2, Henrike Fleige1, Gerd Sutter3,4.   

Abstract

The lung is the vital target organ of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In the majority of patients the most active virus replication seems to be found in the upper respiratory tract, severe cases however suffer from SARS-like disease associated with virus replication in lung tissues. Due to the current lack of suitable anti-viral drugs the induction of protective immunity such as neutralizing antibodies in the lung is the key aim of the only alternative approach-the development and application of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. However, past experience from experimental animals, livestock, and humans showed that induction of immunity in the lung is limited following application of vaccines at peripheral sides such as skin or muscles. Based on several considerations we therefore propose here to consider the application of a Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA)-based vaccine to mucosal surfaces of the respiratory tract as a favorable approach to combat COVID-19.
Copyright © 2020 Förster, Fleige and Sutter.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BALT; COVID-19; MVA; SARS-CoV-2; lung; vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32849655      PMCID: PMC7426738          DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Immunol        ISSN: 1664-3224            Impact factor:   7.561


Introduction

Like skin and intestinal tract the lung stays in close contact with the living environment and is therefore potentially exposed to air-borne pathogens including SARS-CoV-2. However, in contrast to skin and intestine that harbor large amounts of effector immune cells and lymphoid tissues, the non-inflamed lung is largely devoid of both components rendering this organ particularly vulnerable for airborne infections. Several subsets of immune cells populate the skin. Antigen-presenting Langerhans cells reside in the epidermis while dendritic cells, macrophages, and various populations of T cells occupy the dermis (1). Likewise, T cells reside in the intestinal epithelial layer and the intestinal lamina propria is crowded by a plethora of immune cells including T cells, macrophages, dendritic cells, and in particular plasma cells. The latter secrete large amounts of immunoglobulins of the IgA isotype into the mucus overlaying the intestinal epithelium and into the gut lumen. Furthermore, large parts of the intestinal mucosa are decorated with secondary lymphoid organs such as Peyer's patches, cryptopatches, or isolated lymphoid follicles that all have been shown to contribute to the induction and maintenance of systemic as well as mucosal immune responses (2).

Bronchus-Associated Lymphoid Tissue—Balt

Lungs of healthy adults however are largely devoid of lymphoid structures and immune cells are sparsely found in the mucosal layers lining the trachea and the bronchial tree, in the alveolar space but not in the alveolar interstitium. Adaptive immune responses of the lung are primarily initiated and maintained in bronchial and mediastinal lymph nodes that drain the lung but usually not within the lung tissue (3). Furthermore, following application of vaccines at peripheral sides such as skin or muscles, immune protection of the lung is limited (4). Interestingly, children and adolescents—but not healthy adults—frequently harbor tertiary lymphoid tissue structures within the lung (5). These are positioned around bronchi and next to large blood vessels and are known as bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue (BALT). BALT is part of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue that is composed of B cell follicles that are encircled by a para-follicular area rich of T cells and antigen-presenting cells (6). The relevance of BALT for the induction of protective immunity was first demonstrated in splenectomized lymphotoxin-alpha-deficient mice that lack all secondary lymphoid organs. Following repeated stimulation with lipopolysaccharide these mice developed BALT that allowed the induction of protective immunity following otherwise lethal challenges with influenza virus (7).

Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara—Backbone of Successful Vector Vaccines

MVA is a highly attenuated orthopoxvirus that was growth adapted to avian cells and lost its ability to replicate in mammalian hosts. Historically, it had been safety tested in more than 100,000 persons during the smallpox eradication campaign in Germany in the 1970s. Today, MVA serves as basis for licensed vaccines against smallpox and monkeypox in Europe, Canada and the United States (European Medicines Agency, EMA/490157/2013; US Food and Drug Administration, FDA STN 125678/24.09.2019) (8). Moreover, MVA expressing recombinant antigens have been shown to be safe and immunogenic in many human subjects in various clinical studies including more than 1300 infants in Africa and immune compromised patients (9–11). Recent studies using a recombinant MVA expressing the spike protein of the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), a close relative to SARS-CoV-2, revealed safety and immunogenicity upon intramuscular application in a phase 1 trial (12). The same vector vaccine, when co-administered by intranasal and intramuscular inoculations, solidly protected dromedary camels against respiratory tract virus replication following challenge with MERS-CoV (13).

MVA and Balt

During the last decade we studied extensively the ability of MVA to induce BALT and subsequent immune responses in mice. The single intranasal application of MVA in mice induced long lasting formation of BALT within 6–8 days. Extensive immunological characterization, including two-photon microscopy, revealed that MVA-induced BALT acts as a general priming site for T cells against antigens that reach the lower respiratory tract. Furthermore, following intranasal but not intramuscular application, MVA led to the accumulation of activated CD8 effector T cells in the lung (6, 14). Due to lack of experimental data it is currently unknown whether other viral vectors used for vaccination also induce BALT after delivery via the respiratory route or whether even mRNA-based vaccines would have the potential to induce BALT once delivered into the lung. Arguably, the induction of plasma cells secreting neutralizing antibodies of the IgA isotype would be most suited to prevent air-borne lung infections. We therefore studied to what degree intranasal application of MVA led to induction of IgA plasma cells in the lung. To that end mice received a single dose of MVA or were left untreated. Twelve days later lungs were analyzed by histology for the presence of BALT as well as plasma cells. While untreated mice carried on average 0.4 IgA+ plasma cells per mm2 tissue section this value increased 87-fold to 34.7 IgA+ plasma cells/mm2 in MVA-treated mice (Figure 1). Although likely, additional experiments will be required to prove that the IgA plasma cells identified actually secrete anti-MVA antibodies.
Figure 1

Representative sections (A) and quantitative analysis of IgA+ plasma cells in lung sections of mice (B) 12 day after intranasal application of 107 IU non-recombinant MVA or left untreated; Lungs were snap frozen and 8 μm thick sections were prepared. Sections were stained with the antibodies indicated. Micrographs were taken with a 10x lense and numbers of IgA+ cells were determined per micrograph; dots = micrographs analyzed; n = 3 mice per group, 6–10 micrographs per lung analyzed, bars, 100 μm.

Representative sections (A) and quantitative analysis of IgA+ plasma cells in lung sections of mice (B) 12 day after intranasal application of 107 IU non-recombinant MVA or left untreated; Lungs were snap frozen and 8 μm thick sections were prepared. Sections were stained with the antibodies indicated. Micrographs were taken with a 10x lense and numbers of IgA+ cells were determined per micrograph; dots = micrographs analyzed; n = 3 mice per group, 6–10 micrographs per lung analyzed, bars, 100 μm. These findings are in agreement with observations of others identifying ovalbumin-specific IgA antibodies in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in mice intranasally immunized with MVA expressing ovalbumin (15). Others showed in non-human primates that aerosol immunization with recombinant MVA induced specific IgA in the genital tract (16, 17) or T cells specific for the transgene in the lung (18). Furthermore, it has been shown that intranasal application of MVA expressing a secreted form of the bovine herpesvirus 1 (BoHV-1) glycoprotein D protects against BoHV-1 infection in a rabbit model (19). Application of MVA vector vaccines via the respiratory route has been shown to be safe in general (16) but respiratory adverse effects have been reported after intramuscular priming and inhalative boosting with MVA expressing the 85A antigen of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (20).

Conclusion

The profound production of lymphoid tissue that acts as a priming side for immune responses in the lung including induction of T cells as well as IgA-secreting plasma cells renders the local application of MVA encoding the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein a promising approach for preclinical and clinical studies aiming at the prevention of COVID-19.

Data Availability Statement

All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/supplementary material.

Ethics Statement

This animal study was reviewed and approved by Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit, LAVES.

Author Contributions

HF conducted the research. RF conceived the study and analyzed the data. RF and GS wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  20 in total

1.  Role of inducible bronchus associated lymphoid tissue (iBALT) in respiratory immunity.

Authors:  Juan E Moyron-Quiroz; Javier Rangel-Moreno; Kim Kusser; Louise Hartson; Frank Sprague; Stephen Goodrich; David L Woodland; Frances E Lund; Troy D Randall
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 2.  The immunological anatomy of the skin.

Authors:  Kenji Kabashima; Tetsuya Honda; Florent Ginhoux; Gyohei Egawa
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 3.  Regional specialization within the intestinal immune system.

Authors:  Allan M Mowat; William W Agace
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 53.106

4.  Phase 3 Efficacy Trial of Modified Vaccinia Ankara as a Vaccine against Smallpox.

Authors:  Phillip R Pittman; Matthew Hahn; HeeChoon S Lee; Craig Koca; Nathaly Samy; Darja Schmidt; Joachim Hornung; Heinz Weidenthaler; Christopher R Heery; Thomas P H Meyer; Günter Silbernagl; Jane Maclennan; Paul Chaplin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Induction of Both Local Immune Response in Mice and Protection in a Rabbit Model by Intranasal Immunization with Modified Vaccinia Ankara Virus Expressing a Secreted Form of Bovine Herpesvirus 1 Glycoprotein D.

Authors:  María Paula Del Medico Zajac; Flavia Adriana Zanetti; María Soledad Esusy; Carlos Rodolfo Federico; Osvaldo Zabal; Alejandro Rafael Valera; Gabriela Calamante
Journal:  Viral Immunol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.257

6.  Safety and immunogenicity of a candidate tuberculosis vaccine MVA85A delivered by aerosol in BCG-vaccinated healthy adults: a phase 1, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Iman Satti; Joel Meyer; Stephanie A Harris; Zita-Rose Manjaly Thomas; Kristin Griffiths; Richard D Antrobus; Rosalind Rowland; Raquel Lopez Ramon; Mary Smith; Sharon Sheehan; Henry Bettinson; Helen McShane
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 25.071

Review 7.  Harnessing Local Immunity for an Effective Universal Swine Influenza Vaccine.

Authors:  Elma Tchilian; Barbara Holzer
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 5.048

8.  Safety and immunogenicity of a modified vaccinia virus Ankara vector vaccine candidate for Middle East respiratory syndrome: an open-label, phase 1 trial.

Authors:  Till Koch; Christine Dahlke; Anahita Fathi; Alexandra Kupke; Verena Krähling; Nisreen M A Okba; Sandro Halwe; Cornelius Rohde; Markus Eickmann; Asisa Volz; Thomas Hesterkamp; Alen Jambrecina; Saskia Borregaard; My L Ly; Madeleine E Zinser; Etienne Bartels; Joseph S H Poetsch; Reza Neumann; Robert Fux; Stefan Schmiedel; Ansgar W Lohse; Bart L Haagmans; Gerd Sutter; Stephan Becker; Marylyn M Addo
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 25.071

Review 9.  Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara: History, Value in Basic Research, and Current Perspectives for Vaccine Development.

Authors:  A Volz; G Sutter
Journal:  Adv Virus Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 9.937

Review 10.  Antiviral B cell and T cell immunity in the lungs.

Authors:  Christopher Chiu; Peter J Openshaw
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 25.606

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Mouse models in COVID-19 research: analyzing the adaptive immune response.

Authors:  Sabrina Clever; Asisa Volz
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 4.148

2.  Human endogenous retrovirus-enveloped baculoviral DNA vaccines against MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV2.

Authors:  Hansam Cho; Yuyeon Jang; Ki-Hoon Park; Hanul Choi; Aleksandra Nowakowska; Hee-Jung Lee; Minjee Kim; Min-Hee Kang; Jin-Hoi Kim; Ha Youn Shin; Yu-Kyoung Oh; Young Bong Kim
Journal:  NPJ Vaccines       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 7.344

3.  One or two injections of MVA-vectored vaccine shields hACE2 transgenic mice from SARS-CoV-2 upper and lower respiratory tract infection.

Authors:  Ruikang Liu; Jeffrey L Americo; Catherine A Cotter; Patricia L Earl; Noam Erez; Chen Peng; Bernard Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  MVA Vector Vaccines Inhibit SARS CoV-2 Replication in Upper and Lower Respiratory Tracts of Transgenic Mice and Prevent Lethal Disease.

Authors:  Ruikang Liu; Jeffrey L Americo; Catherine A Cotter; Patricia L Earl; Noam Erez; Chen Peng; Bernard Moss
Journal:  bioRxiv       Date:  2021-01-01

5.  Intranasal Delivery of MVA Vector Vaccine Induces Effective Pulmonary Immunity Against SARS-CoV-2 in Rodents.

Authors:  Berislav Bošnjak; Ivan Odak; Joana Barros-Martins; Inga Sandrock; Swantje I Hammerschmidt; Marc Permanyer; Gwendolyn E Patzer; Hristo Greorgiev; Rodrigo Gutierrez Jauregui; Alina Tscherne; Jan Hendrik Schwarz; Georgia Kalodimou; George Ssebyatika; Malgorzata Ciurkiewicz; Stefanie Willenzon; Anja Bubke; Jasmin Ristenpart; Christiane Ritter; Tamara Tuchel; Christian Meyer Zu Natrup; Dai-Lun Shin; Sabrina Clever; Leonard Limpinsel; Wolfgang Baumgärtner; Thomas Krey; Asisa Volz; Gerd Sutter; Reinhold Förster
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 6.  Viruses as tools in gene therapy, vaccine development, and cancer treatment.

Authors:  Musab Bin Umair; Fujimura Nao Akusa; Hadia Kashif; Fatima Butt; Marium Azhar; Iqra Munir; Muhammad Ahmed; Wajeeha Khalil; Hafiz Sharyar; Shazia Rafique; Muhammad Shahid; Samia Afzal
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 2.685

Review 7.  Environmental Risk Assessment of Recombinant Viral Vector Vaccines against SARS-Cov-2.

Authors:  Aline Baldo; Amaya Leunda; Nicolas Willemarck; Katia Pauwels
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-03

Review 8.  Application of Viral Vectors for Vaccine Development with a Special Emphasis on COVID-19.

Authors:  Kenneth Lundstrom
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 5.048

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.