| Literature DB >> 32849519 |
Lixia Sheng1, Qitian Mu1, Xiaoqing Wu1, Shujun Yang1, Huiling Zhu1, Jiaping Wang1, Yanli Lai1, Hao Wu1, Ye Sun1, Yongxian Hu2, Huarui Fu2, Yi Wang1, Kaihong Xu1, Yongcheng Sun1, Yanli Zhang1, Ping Zhang1, Miao Zhou1, Binbin Lai1, Zhijuan Xu1, Minjie Gao1, Yi Zhang1, Guifang Ouyang1.
Abstract
Objectives: The mechanism and immunoregulatory role of human natural killer (NK) cells in acute graft-vs.-host-disease (aGVHD) remains unclear. This study quantitatively analyzed the cytotoxicity of donor NK cells toward allo-reactive T cells, and investigated their relationship with acute GVHD (aGVHD).Entities:
Keywords: CD107a; allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; cytotoxicity; graft vs. host disease; natural killer cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32849519 PMCID: PMC7411138 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01534
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Patient, donor, disease, and transplantation characteristics.
| 47 | 51 | – | |
| Patient age | 38 (15-63) | 40 (14-65) | 0.177 |
| Patent sex (M:F) | 25:22 | 26:25 | 0.827 |
| Diagnosis | 0.156 | ||
| ALL | 5 | 14 | |
| AML | 16 | 14 | |
| MDS | 15 | 17 | |
| NHL | 8 | 3 | |
| CML | 3 | 3 | |
| High risk, no. (%) | 12 | 21 | 0.102 |
| Donor source | 0.051 | ||
| MRD | 22 | 15 | |
| Haplo-identical | 17 | 31 | |
| MUD | 8 | 5 | |
| Donor/patient sex | 0.199 | ||
| M–>M | 15 | 8 | |
| M–>F | 12 | 18 | |
| F–>M | 10 | 12 | |
| F–>F | 10 | 13 | |
| Conditioning | 0.439 | ||
| MA | 45 | 51 | |
| RIC | 2 | 0 | |
| GVHD prophylaxis | 0.076 | ||
| MTX + CSA + MMF + ATG | 25 | 36 | |
| MTX + CSA + MMF | 22 | 15 | |
| KIR-L GVH mismatch | 18 | 21 | 0.77 |
| Cell composition in allografts, median (range) | |||
| CD34+ cells, ×106/kg | 6.1 (2.05~16.73) | 5.3 (1.58~12.40) | 0.197 |
| CD3+ cells, ×108/kg | 1.88 (0.43~4.07) | 1.78 (0.35~4.78) | 0.347 |
| CD56+ cells, ×107/kg | 3.38 (0.29~6.45) | 2.68 (0.27~7.10) | 0.059 |
| NK:T ratio | 0.225 (0.051~0.498) | 0.172 (0.049~0.698) | 0.117 |
GVHD, graft-vs.-host disease; F, female; M, male; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; NHL, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; CML, Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia; MRD, matched related donor; MUD, matched unrelated donor; KIR-L, killer Ig-like receptor ligand; NK, natural killer cell; T, T cell.
Figure 1NK cells inhibit T cell proliferation by selectively killing alloantigen activated T cells. (A) Representative gating strategy for NK and T cell sorting; (B) Representative gating strategy for T cell proliferation assay. (C,D) CFSE-labeled CD3+T cells were stimulated with PHA, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 mAbs or allo-DCs, and autologous CD56+ NK cells were added at NK/T ratios of 0:10, 1:10, or 1:5. Four days later, CD3+T cell proliferation was analyzed by flow cytometry. The percentage of proliferating T cells was defined by CFSE intensities (n = 4). (E,F) CFSE-labeled CD3+T cells were first stimulated with allo-DCs for 96 h and then used as target cells for NK killing assays at effector:target (E:T) ratios of 50:1, 25:1, 10:1, 5:1, or 1:1. Allo-reactive T cells were distinguished by lower CFSE intensity (CFSElow) in CD3+T cells. 7AAD was labeled to identify dead cell and analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 4). (G,H) Naïve T cells or T cells activated by anti-CD3/anti-CD28 mAbs were co-cultured with NK cells at an effector:target (E:T) ratio of 1:1 for CD107a degranulating assay. NK cells cultured alone were used as controls. The percentage of CD107a+ in CD56+NK cells represented the level of NK degranulation toward T cells (n = 4). All calculated averages were defined as the parametric mean ± SD. Student's t-tests, or two-way ANOVA analyses, were used to compare the mean among groups. ns: not significant. **P < 0.01.
Figure 2Subgroup and receptor expression of donor NK cells affected NK degranulation toward activated T cells associated with aGVHD. (A) Representative gating strategy. CD56dim and CD56bright NK cells were gated and subsets were defined based on the expression of NKG2A, the percentage of CD107a positive cells was analyzed on each subset of NK cells. (B) CD107a expression in CD56dim and CD56bright NK cells (n = 4), (C) CD107a expression in NKG2A− and NKG2A+ subgroups (n = 4), (D) NK cells were pretreated with neutralizing antibodies (or relevant isotype-matched Ig controls) before degranulation assay (n = 4). (E) Levels of donor NK degranulation toward activated T cells were significantly lower in the aGVHD group than in the non-aGVHD group (P = 0.001, n = 98). Percentage of CD56dim and CD56bright NK cells (F), NKG2A+ NK cells (G) in allografts from the aGVHD and non-aGVHD groups (n = 98). MFI of CD226 (H); NKG2D (I) and NKP46 (J) of NK cells in allografts from aGVHD and non-aGVHD groups (n = 98). All calculated averages were defined as the parametric mean ± SD. Student's t-tests or two-way ANOVA analyses were used to compare the mean among groups.
Figure 3Donor NK CD107a degranulation toward activated T cells was predictive for risk of aGVHD, chronic GVHD, relapse, and overall survival. The Gray's test was applied for comparisons of cumulative incidences of acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, and relapse. Death, without aGVHD, was defined as the competing event for aGVHD, while relapse-free mortality was the competing event for relapse. Cumulative incidence estimates of grade I–IV aGVHD (A), gradeII–IV aGVHD (B), grade III–IV aGVHD (C), chronic GVHD (D), and relapse (E) or Kaplan–Meier survival estimates for overall survival (F) for patients in “CD107alow” and “CD107ahigh” groups, separated according to the optimal cutoff of 20.5% for donor NK CD107a degranulation toward activated T cells.
Figure 4Subgroup analysis for predictive value of the donor NK CD107a degranulation toward activated T cells for grade I–IV aGVHD. (A) HLA-matched related HSCT(MRD), (B) HLA-matched unrelated HSCT(MUD), (C) HLA-haplo-identical related HSCT. (D) Patients with ATG for the prophylaxis of GVHD.
Univariate and multivariable analysis of risk factors for clinical outcomes of allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
| NK dose: >2.19 vs. ≤ 2.19 × 107/kg | 0.551 | 0.315–0.963 | 0.037 | |||
| With ATG vs. without ATG | 0.603 | 0.33–1.101 | 0.096 | |||
| NK CD107a level: >20.5 vs. ≤ 20.5% | 0.294 | 0.156–0.554 | 0.000 | 0.357 | 0.184–0.69 | 0.002 |
| NKG2A + %NK: >25.5 vs. ≤ 25.5% | 1.648 | 0.927–2.931 | 0.089 | |||
| MFI-CD226 of NK: >3,589 vs. ≤ 3,589 | 0.492 | 0.231–1.048 | 0.066 | |||
| MFI-NKG2D of NK: >2,491 vs. ≤ 2,491 | 0.471 | 0.257–0.862 | 0.015 | 0.384 | 0.285–0.721 | 0.003 |
| MRD vs. Haplo | 0.504 | 0.268–0.946 | 0.033 | |||
| NK dose: >2.19 vs. ≤ 2.19 × 107/kg | 0.428 | 0.173–1.055 | 0.094 | |||
| NK CD107a level: >20.5 vs. ≤ 20.5% | 0.102 | 0.024–0.445 | 0.002 | 0.13 | 0.029–0.595 | 0.009 |
| NKG2A + %NK: >25.5 vs. ≤ 25.5% | 3.368 | 1.372–8.355 | 0.008 | 3.627 | 1.466–0.026 | 0.005 |
| MFI-NKG2D of NK: >2,491 vs. ≤ 2,491 | 0.403 | 0.145–1.123 | 0.082 | |||
| NK CD107a level: >20.5 vs. ≤ 20.5% | 0.503 | 0.248–1.019 | 0.034 | |||
| Non-aGVHD vs. aGVHD | 2.134 | 1.065–4.279 | 0.033 | |||
| High risk | 9.185 | 2.905–29.035 | 0.000 | 6.924 | 1.922–24.941 | 0.003 |
| Donor NK CD107a level | 0.157 | 0.035–0.696 | 0.015 | |||
| High risk | 4.229 | 1.865–9.588 | 0.001 | 3.619 | 1.573–8.325 | 0.002 |
| 0–II aGVHD vs. III–IV aGVHD | 0.124 | 0.038–0.405 | 0.002 | 2.934 | 1.253–6.870 | 0.013 |
| NK CD107a level: >20.5 vs. ≤ 20.5% | 0.355 | 0.14–0.895 | 0.028 | |||