| Literature DB >> 32848871 |
Lu Qin1, Jianhua Li1.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of one-time acute heat treatment (HT) on the exaggerated exercise pressor reflex in a model of peripheral arterial insufficiency induced by ligation of the femoral artery and was to further examine the underlying mechanism of ATP-P2X3 signal activity during this process. The blood pressure (BP) response to static muscle contraction and muscle tendon stretch was recorded to determine the exercise pressor reflex. Also, αβ-methylene ATP (αβ-me ATP) was injected into the arterial blood supply of the hindlimb muscles to stimulate P2X3 receptors in the muscle afferent nerves. To process one-time acute HT, a heating pad was placed locally on the hindlimb and the muscle temperature (Tm) was increased by ~1.5°C and maintained for 5 min. Compared with control rats, a greater mean arterial pressure (MAP) response to muscle contraction was observed in rats with femoral occlusion in a pre-heat control session (28 ± 2 mmHg in occluded rats/n = 12 vs. 18 ± 2 mmHg in control rats/n = 9; p < 0.05). The one-time acute HT attenuated the amplification of the BP response in rats with femoral artery occlusion (MAP response: 19 ± 8 mmHg in occluded rats + HT/n = 11; p < 0.05 vs. occluded rats). In contrast, HT did not significantly attenuate amplification of MAP response to muscle stretch and αβ-me ATP injection in rats with femoral artery occlusion and controls (all p > 0.05). Our data suggest that one-time acute HT selectively attenuates the amplified pressor response induced by activation of the metabolic and mechanical components of the reflex in rats after femoral artery occlusion. The suppressing effects of acute HT on the exaggerated exercise pressor reflex are likely mediated through a reduction in metabolites (e.g., ATP) stimulating the muscle afferent nerves in contracting muscle, but unlikely through direct alteration of P2X receptors per se.Entities:
Keywords: ATP; blood pressure; exercise; femoral artery occlusion; muscle temperature
Year: 2020 PMID: 32848871 PMCID: PMC7424045 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00942
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1Basal muscle temperature and muscle temperature following the one-time acute heat treatment (HT) in control rats and peripheral artery disease (PAD) rats. Baseline muscle temperature was lower in PAD rats (n = 21) than that in control rats (n = 23). Following the HT, the muscle temperature was increased by ~1.5°C. As a result, the muscle temperature was also lower in PAD + HT rats (n = 20) than the control + HT rats (n = 17). The time length for HT was 5 min. * p < 0.05 for baseline muscle temperature between control rats and PAD rats; † p < 0.05 for the muscle temperature following the HT between control + HT rats and PAD + HT rats. HT = one-time acute heat treatment. The numbers in the bracket under each group indicate the sample size. Individual data points are indicated for Control group (●); Control + HT group (▼); PAD group (▲); and PAD + HT group (♦).
The baseline values for blood pressure (BP) in muscle contraction and muscle stretch experiments.
| CON | HT | REC | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control rats | PAD rats | Control rats | PAD rats | Control rats | PAD rats | ||
| Muscle contraction | Sample size ( | 10 | 11 | 9 | 11 | 8 | 10 |
| BP (mmHg) | 91 ± 14 | 93 ± 14 | 95 ± 16 | 95 ± 14 | 90 ± 6 | 96 ± 13 | |
| Muscle stretch | Sample size ( | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 |
| BP (mmHg) | 88 ± 12 | 92 ± 17 | 86 ± 13 | 104 ± 20 | 89 ± 14 | 98 ± 20 | |
BP, blood pressure; CON, pre-heat control session; HT, one-time acute heat treatment; and REC, post-heat recovery session. No significant differences in basal MAP before contraction and stretch were found among different sessions in the two groups and two different groups in the same session (p > 0.05). All the data were present as mean ± SD.
Figure 2Responses of mean arterial blood (MAP) pressure and heart rate (HR) in control rats and PAD rats induced by muscle contraction and muscle stretch. In control (CON) and recovery (REC) session, MAP response to muscle contraction (A) was amplified in PAD rats when compared with the control rats. In HT session, the MAP response to muscle contraction in PAD rats was lower than that in CON; MAP response to muscle stretch (B) were higher in PAD rats than in control during either CON and HT session; * p < 0.05 vs. control rats and † p < 0.05 vs. PAD rats in the control session. There were no significant differences in the HR response during the muscle contraction (A) and muscle stretch (B) in different groups and sessions (p > 0.05). CON = pre-heat control session; HT = one-time acute heat treatment; and REC = post-heat recovery session. The numbers in the bracket under each session name indicate the sample size. ●: individual data points for Control rats; ▼: individual data points for PAD rats.
Developed muscle tension during contraction in different groups and sessions.
| CON | HT | REC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control rats | PAD rats | Control rats | PAD rats | Control rats | PAD rats | |
| Sample size ( | 9 | 11 | 8 | 11 | 7 | 10 |
| Tension (g) | 557 ± 104 | 485 ± 105 | 501 ± 84 | 560 ± 130 | 604 ± 104 | 575 ± 75 |
CON, pre-heat control session; HT, one-time acute heat treatment; REC, post-heat recovery session; and g, gram. No significant differences in muscle tension among different sessions in the two groups and two different groups in the same session (p > 0.05). All the data were present as mean ± SD.
The baseline values for BP in 0.0625 and 0.125 mM αβ-me ATP administration experiments.
| CON | HT | REC | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control rats | PAD rats | Control rats | PAD rats | Control rats | PAD rats | ||
| 0.0625 mM | Sample size ( | 5 | 9 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 8 |
| BP (mmHg) | 96 ± 23 | 99 ± 21 | 93 ± 25 | 95 ± 20 | 99 ± 24 | 93 ± 16 | |
| 0.125 mM | Sample size ( | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| BP (mmHg) | 93 ± 17 | 90 ± 20 | 89 ± 35 | 90 ± 14 | 91 ± 14 | 88 ± 6 | |
BP, blood pressure; CON, pre-heat control session; HT, one-time acute heat treatment; and REC, post-heat recovery session. No significant differences in basal MAP before injection of each dosage of αβ-me ATP were found among different sessions in the two groups and two different groups in the same session (p > 0.05). All the data were present as mean ± SD.
Figure 3Responses of MAP in control rats and PAD rats following 0.0625 mM (A) and 0.125 mM (B) of αβ-methylene ATP (αβ-me ATP) administration. In three sessions of CON, HT and REC, MAP response to 0.0625 mM and 0.125 mM of αβ-me ATP administration were higher in PAD rats than in control rats. However, the MAP response was not attenuated in either PAD and in control rats following the one-time acute HT. * p < 0.05 vs. control rats. CON = pre-heat control session; HT = one-time acute heat treatment; and REC = post-heat recovery session. The numbers in the bracket under each session name indicate the sample size. ●: individual data points for Control rats; ▼: individual data points for PAD rats.