Literature DB >> 32848038

Laboratory-Based Surveillance of Clostridium difficile Infection in Australian Health Care and Community Settings, 2013 to 2018.

Stacey Hong1,2, Papanin Putsathit3, Narelle George4, Christine Hemphill5, Peter G Huntington6, Tony M Korman7, Despina Kotsanas7, Monica Lahra8, Rodney McDougall9, Casey V Moore10, Graeme R Nimmo4, Louise Prendergast5, Jennifer Robson9, Lynette Waring5, Michael C Wehrhahn11, Gerhard F Weldhagen10, Richard M Wilson12, Thomas V Riley13,2,3,14, Daniel R Knight2.   

Abstract

In the early 2000s, a binary toxin (CDT)-producing strain of Clostridium difficile, ribotype 027 (RT027), caused extensive outbreaks of diarrheal disease in North America and Europe. This strain has not become established in Australia, and there is a markedly different repertoire of circulating strains there compared to other regions of the world. The C. difficile Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (CDARS) study is a nationwide longitudinal surveillance study of C. difficile infection (CDI) in Australia. Here, we describe the molecular epidemiology of CDI in Australian health care and community settings over the first 5 years of the study, 2013 to 2018. Between 2013 and 2018, 10 diagnostic microbiology laboratories from five states in Australia participated in the CDARS study. From each of five states, one private (representing community) and one public (representing hospitals) laboratory submitted isolates of C. difficile or PCR-positive stool samples during two collection periods per year, February-March (summer/autumn) and August-September (winter/spring). C. difficile was characterized by toxin gene profiling and ribotyping. A total of 1,523 isolates of C. difficile were studied. PCR ribotyping yielded 203 different RTs, the most prevalent being RT014/020 (n = 449; 29.5%). The epidemic CDT+ RT027 (n = 2) and RT078 (n = 6), and the recently described RT251 (n = 10) and RT244 (n = 6) were not common, while RT126 (n = 17) was the most prevalent CDT+ type. A heterogeneous C. difficile population was identified. C. difficile RT014/020 was the most prevalent type found in humans with CDI. Continued surveillance of CDI in Australia remains critical for the detection of emerging strain lineages.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clostridium difficilezzm321990; molecular epidemiology; ribotyping; surveillance

Year:  2020        PMID: 32848038      PMCID: PMC7587093          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01552-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  30 in total

1.  Emergence of Clostridium difficile infection due to a new hypervirulent strain, polymerase chain reaction ribotype 078.

Authors:  Abraham Goorhuis; Dennis Bakker; Jeroen Corver; Sylvia B Debast; Celine Harmanus; Daan W Notermans; Aldert A Bergwerff; Frido W Dekker; Ed J Kuijper
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Severe Clostridium difficile infection in New Zealand associated with an emerging strain, PCR-ribotype 244.

Authors:  Mary N De Almeida; Helen Heffernan; Anne Dervan; Sarah Bakker; Joshua T Freeman; Hasan Bhally; Susan L Taylor; Thomas V Riley; Sally A Roberts
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2013-08-16

3.  Severe infection with Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 027 acquired in Melbourne, Australia.

Authors:  Michael Richards; James Knox; Briony Elliott; Kate Mackin; Dena Lyras; Lynette J Waring; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 7.738

4.  Surveillance snapshot of Clostridium difficile infection in hospitals across Queensland detects binary toxin producing ribotype UK 244.

Authors:  Charlotte A Huber; Lisa Hall; Nikki F Foster; Mareeka Gray; Michelle Allen; Leisha J Richardson; Jennifer Robson; Renu Vohra; Sanmarie Schlebusch; Narelle George; Graeme R Nimmo; Thomas V Riley; David L Paterson
Journal:  Commun Dis Intell Q Rep       Date:  2014-12-31

5.  The ClosER study: results from a three-year pan-European longitudinal surveillance of antibiotic resistance among prevalent Clostridium difficile ribotypes, 2011-2014.

Authors:  J Freeman; J Vernon; S Pilling; K Morris; S Nicholson; S Shearman; C Longshaw; M H Wilcox
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2017-10-21       Impact factor: 8.067

6.  Clostridium difficile infection in Europe: a hospital-based survey.

Authors:  Martijn P Bauer; Daan W Notermans; Birgit H B van Benthem; Jon S Brazier; Mark H Wilcox; Maja Rupnik; Dominique L Monnet; Jaap T van Dissel; Ed J Kuijper
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  High prevalence and diversity of tcdA-negative and tcdB-positive, and non-toxigenic, Clostridium difficile in Thailand.

Authors:  Korakrit Imwattana; Piyada Wangroongsarb; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 3.331

8.  Nationwide surveillance study of Clostridium difficile in Australian neonatal pigs shows high prevalence and heterogeneity of PCR ribotypes.

Authors:  Daniel R Knight; Michele M Squire; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Surveillance for antimicrobial resistance in Australian isolates of Clostridium difficile, 2013-14.

Authors:  Daniel R Knight; Steven Giglio; Peter G Huntington; Tony M Korman; Despina Kotsanas; Casey V Moore; David L Paterson; Louise Prendergast; Charlotte A Huber; Jennifer Robson; Lynette Waring; Michael C Wehrhahn; Gerhard F Weldhagen; Richard M Wilson; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Increasing incidence of Clostridium difficile infection, Australia, 2011-2012.

Authors:  Claudia Slimings; Paul Armstrong; Wendy D Beckingham; Ann L Bull; Lisa Hall; Karina J Kennedy; John Marquess; Rebecca McCann; Andrea Menzies; Brett G Mitchell; Michael J Richards; Paul C Smollen; Lauren Tracey; Irene J Wilkinson; Fiona L Wilson; Leon J Worth; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 7.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.