| Literature DB >> 32847993 |
Prajjwal Pyakurel1, Archana Shrestha2, Biraj M Karmacharya2, Shyam S Budhathoki3, Rajendra Kumar Chaudhari4, Dipesh Tamrakar2, Abha Shrestha2, Robin M Karmacharya2, Anmol Shrestha2, Sumitra Sharma5, Sanjib Kumar Sharma4, Donna Spiegelman6.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In Nepal, approximately 31% of adult industrial employees have diabetes. While the prevention of type 2 diabetes through behavioural intervention has been disseminated, worksite could be an effective platform for the translation of this knowledge into action as employed adults spend most of their workday waking hours at workplaces. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a behavioural and a canteen intervention on diabetes risk reduction among those who are prediabetic at two worksites in eastern Nepal. We will recruit 162 adult full-time factory workers with haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 5.7%-6.4% at baseline or fasting blood sugar of 100-125 mg/dL. The 8-14 months' control period will be followed by the behavioural intervention where half of the participants will be randomised to receive the behavioural intervention and half will act as a control and will not receive any intervention. Then, all participants will receive the canteen intervention. The analysis will be intent-to-treat, comparing the difference in the change in HbA1c% between the behavioural intervention group and the control group using a two-sample t-test. The within-participant changes in HbA1c after 6 or more months on the canteen intervention among those not randomised to the behavioural intervention in the previous period will be assessed using the paired t-test. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board at Yale School of Public Health, New Havens, USA and the Nepal Health Research Council. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04161937. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Entities:
Keywords: coronary artery disease; diabetic heart disease; public health
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32847993 PMCID: PMC7451278 DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001236
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Heart ISSN: 2053-3624
Figure 1Study design, worksite intervention study. HbA1c, haemoglobin A1c.
Data collection schedule for the worksite intervention study to prevent diabetes in Nepal
| Screening | Baseline month 1–2 | First follow-up | Second follow-up | Third follow-up | |
| Screening (age, sex, family history of diabetes, occupational characteristics, physical measurements (height, weight, waist circumference) | X | ||||
| Demographics (age, sex, education, marital status) | X | ||||
| Lifestyle (smoking, drinking, physical activity) | X | X | X | X | |
| Diet (24-hour dietary recall) | X | X | X | X | |
| Physical measurement (height, weight, waist circumference) | X | X | X | X | |
| Blood pressure | X | X | X | X | |
| Biochemical measurement (HbA1c, fasting glucose, HDL, LDL, total cholesterol, triglycerides) | X | X | X | X |
HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein.
Canteen intervention in the industrial sector of eastern Nepal
| Components | Activities |
| Strengthen canteen management | Formation of canteen intervention team (CIT) including industry managers, administrative department, union leaders, canteen operators, security personnel investigator, research assistants, nutritionist Training will be conducted for the CIT on a healthy diet; taking note of local context Monthly meetings with CIT will be organised to monitor the intervention and discuss the challenges and barriers for effective implementation and strategies for resolving them |
| Capacity building of cafeteria employee | Capacity assessment of the cafeteria employee will be undertaken to identify the strengths and weakness, form strategies for addressing weakness and educate them on diabetes, hypertension and other cardiovascular disease prevention strategies through healthy eating Cooking classes will beconducted for canteen staff to promote healthy cooking practices in the canteen. We will gradually promote healthy eating practices by developing and understanding workers food-related preferences, attitudes and behaviours of people considering the local context A team for weekly monitoring and evaluation of the cooking practices at the canteen will be formed |
| Food modification in the canteen | Healthy foods will replace unhealthy foods with context-specific culturally appropriate interventions Replacing white rice with brown rice. Mixing brown rice with 50% white rice. We will consider adding older grains such as millet, finger millet and sorghum in addition to or instead of the brown rice Decreasing the amount of sugar in tea and adding cinnamon and/or ginger and lemon. We will promote lemon tea Fresh fruits and vegetables will be introduced The salt content in cooked vegetables and pulses will be lowered and we will encourage the use of onion, garlic and herbs to add flavour Less use of oil and the use of healthier locally available monosaturated and polyunsaturated oils will be encouraged High sugary drinks will be replaced by water |
| Information Education and Communication (IEC) | A formal programme launch event will kick off the canteen intervention The IEC package will consist of poster displays, pamphlets, healthy food presentation and group discussions All the labour workers, administrative staffs, union leaders, section chief and executives will be invited to attend a brief half-hour session on healthy eating and healthy food choices in the canteen |
Demographic characteristics of enrolled participants (n=162)
| Characteristics | Frequency | Percent |
| Age (years) (mean (SD) | 40.4 (9.7) | |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 162 | 100 |
| Ethnicity | ||
| Terai Janjati | 87 | 54 |
| Madhesi | 39 | 24 |
| Brahmin/Chettri | 28 | 17 |
| Others | 08 | |
| Marital status | ||
| Married | 140 | 87 |
| Not married | 20 | 12 |
| Others | 02 | 1 |
| Religion | ||
| Hindu | 162 | 100 |
| Education | ||
| Less than high school | 140 | 86 |
| High School or more | 22 | 14 |
| Years of formal education, mean (SD) | 9.2 (3.8) |
CVD risk factors of enrolled participants at baseline (n=162)
| Characteristics | Frequency | Percent |
| Smoking | ||
| Never | 126 | 78 |
| Former | 16 | 10 |
| Current | 20 | 12 |
| Number of pack year for former and current smoker (n=49) | ||
| <5 pack year | 40 | 82 |
| ≥5 pack year | 09 | 18 |
| Ever had alcohol | ||
| No | 65 | 40 |
| Yes | 97 | 60 |
| Alcohol intake, drinks per day among ever drinkers (n=68) | ||
| 1 drink/day | 06 | 6 |
| 2 drinks/day | 21 | 22 |
| 3 drinks/day | 06 | 6 |
| >3 drinks/day | 64 | 66 |
| Total physical activity (n=138) | ||
| Low (<600 MET min/week) | 80 | 58 |
| High (≥600 MET min/week) | 58 | 42 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | ||
| Underweight <18.5 | 06 | 4 |
| Normal 18.5–24.9 | 85 | 52 |
| Overweight 25–29.9 | 62 | 38 |
| Obese ≥30 | 09 | 6 |
| Mean (SD) | 24.2 (3.9) | |
| Hypertension (mm Hg) | ||
| Normal <120/<80 | 51 | 31 |
| Prehypertension 120–139/80–89 | 63 | 39 |
| Hypertension ≥140/≥90 | 48 | 30 |
| Systolic blood pressure, mean (SD) | 127.9 (17.2) | |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mean (SD) | 81.7 (12.6) | |
CVD, cardiovascular disease.
CVD biomarkers of enrolled participants at baseline (n=162)
| Characteristics | Frequency | Percent |
| HbA1c% | ||
| Prediabetic (5.7–6.4) | 145 | 100 |
| Mean (SD) | 5.9 (0.1) | |
| *Fasting blood sugar (mg/dL) | ||
| Prediabetic 100–125.9 | 17 | 100 |
| Mean (SD) | 116.1 (9.1) | |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) (n=145) | ||
| Normal <200 | 87 | 63 |
| Borderline 200–239 | 30 | 22 |
| High ≥240 | 20 | 15 |
| Missing | 08 | |
| Mean (SD) | 191.1 (43.2) | |
| HDL (mg/dL) | ||
| Desirable ≥40 | 84 | 61 |
| Low <40 | 53 | 39 |
| Missing | 08 | |
| Mean (SD) | 44.2 (12.0) | |
| LDL (mg/dL) | ||
| Desirable <100 | 59 | 43 |
| Near desirable 100–129 | 40 | 29 |
| Bordeline high 130–159 | 27 | 20 |
| High 160–189 | 08 | 6 |
| Very high ≥190 | 03 | 2 |
| Missing | 08 | |
| Mean (SD) | 109.4 (36.5) | |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | ||
| Desirable <150 | 70 | 51 |
| Bordeline high 150–199 | 23 | 17 |
| High 200–499 | 37 | 27 |
| Very high ≥500 | 07 | 5 |
| Missing | 08 | |
| Mean (SD) | 194.5 (139.1) |
*Lipid profile not done for prediabetic diagnosed through FBS.
CVD, cardiovascular disease; FBS, fasting blood sugar; HbA1c, haemoglobin A1c; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein.