Susanne M van der Veen1, Ulrike Hammerbeck2, Kristen L Hollands3. 1. Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Physical Therapy, 1200 E. Broad streetPO BOX 980224, Room B-045, Richmond VA, USA. Electronic address: smvanderveen@vcu.edu. 2. Manchester University, Physical Therapy, Manchester, UK. Electronic address: ulrike.hammerbeck@manchester.ac.uk. 3. Salford University, Health science, Salford, UK. Electronic address: k.hollands@salford.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The high prevalence of falls due to trips and slips following stroke may signify difficulty adjusting foot-placement in response to the environment. However, little is known about under what circumstances foot-placement adjustment becomes difficult for stroke survivors (SS), making the design of targeted rehabilitation interventions to improve independent community mobility difficult. RESEARCH QUESTION: To investigate the effect of planned and reactive target-stepping on foot-placement accuracy in stroke survivors and young and older healthy adults? METHODS: Young (N = 11, 30 ± 6 years) and older (N = 10, 64 ± 8 years) healthy adults and SS (N = 11, 67 ± 9 years) walked, at preferred pace, on a force instrumented treadmill. Each participant walked to illuminated targets, visible two steps in advance (planned) or appearing at contralateral midstance (reactive). Foot-placement error (magnitude and bias) and number of missed targets were compared. RESULTS: All participants missed more reactive than planned targets (p = 0.05), and SS missed more targets than young (p < 0.001) and older (p = 0.001) adults. But no interaction showing SS missed more reactive targets than other groups was found. For all groups: reactive adaptations to steps in the antero-posterior plane resulted in lower error than planned adaptations (p = 0.027). Lengthening steps where undershot more than shortening (p < 0.001) by all groups. Reactive medio-lateral adaptations over all induced larger error (p = 0.029) than planned and changed the direction of bias (p = 0.018). SIGNIFICANCE: SS experience difficulty making all adjustments, they showed increased error in all conditions but less pronounced difference between planned and reactive stepping. SS may use a reactive control strategy for all adjustments, in contrast to healthy young adults who may plan foot-placement in advance. The likelihood of stroke survivors misplacing a step is large, with 9.8% targets missed; possibly leading to falls. Further investigation is needed to understand foot-placement control strategies used by SS and the role of planning in gait adaptability. Published by Elsevier B.V.
BACKGROUND: The high prevalence of falls due to trips and slips following stroke may signify difficulty adjusting foot-placement in response to the environment. However, little is known about under what circumstances foot-placement adjustment becomes difficult for stroke survivors (SS), making the design of targeted rehabilitation interventions to improve independent community mobility difficult. RESEARCH QUESTION: To investigate the effect of planned and reactive target-stepping on foot-placement accuracy in stroke survivors and young and older healthy adults? METHODS: Young (N = 11, 30 ± 6 years) and older (N = 10, 64 ± 8 years) healthy adults and SS (N = 11, 67 ± 9 years) walked, at preferred pace, on a force instrumented treadmill. Each participant walked to illuminated targets, visible two steps in advance (planned) or appearing at contralateral midstance (reactive). Foot-placement error (magnitude and bias) and number of missed targets were compared. RESULTS: All participants missed more reactive than planned targets (p = 0.05), and SS missed more targets than young (p < 0.001) and older (p = 0.001) adults. But no interaction showing SS missed more reactive targets than other groups was found. For all groups: reactive adaptations to steps in the antero-posterior plane resulted in lower error than planned adaptations (p = 0.027). Lengthening steps where undershot more than shortening (p < 0.001) by all groups. Reactive medio-lateral adaptations over all induced larger error (p = 0.029) than planned and changed the direction of bias (p = 0.018). SIGNIFICANCE: SS experience difficulty making all adjustments, they showed increased error in all conditions but less pronounced difference between planned and reactive stepping. SS may use a reactive control strategy for all adjustments, in contrast to healthy young adults who may plan foot-placement in advance. The likelihood of stroke survivors misplacing a step is large, with 9.8% targets missed; possibly leading to falls. Further investigation is needed to understand foot-placement control strategies used by SS and the role of planning in gait adaptability. Published by Elsevier B.V.