BACKGROUND: Virtual scribe services (VSS) are a contemporary take on the in-person scribes utilized as a means to reduce administrative burden on physicians and enhance the physician-patient interaction. The purpose of this study was to determine whether VSS use could decrease the time an orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeon spends on documentation without diminishing the patient experience as compared with traditional postencounter dictation (TD). METHODS: Fifty patients presenting for first-time visits with a single orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeon were prospectively enrolled and randomized to VSS or TD prior to the physician-patient encounter. Time spent with the patient in the exam room and time spent documenting away from the patient were recorded. A postencounter survey assessed patient satisfaction, perception of physician empathy, understanding of the plan, and perception of the amount of time spent with the physician. RESULTS: Of 50 patients enrolled, 25 were randomized to VSS. Time spent documenting away from the patient differed significantly between VSS and TD (1.2 ± 0.7 minutes for VSS vs 5.8 ± 1.7 minutes for TD, P < .001) as did time elapsed between the end of the visit and the start of dictation (0 ± 0 for VSS vs 118.2 ± 72.7 minutes for TD, P < .001). There was a trend toward more time spent with the patient in the VSS group than in the TD group (14.2 ± 5.9 minutes for VSS vs 11.4 ± 5.1 minutes for TD, P = .069). There were no differences between groups in survey responses regarding satisfaction, empathy, understanding, or perception of sufficient time spent with the physician (P > .05 for each). CONCLUSIONS: VSS use in an orthopaedic foot and ankle practice significantly decreased documentation time and allowed for completion of documentation during patient visits without differences in quality metrics as compared to TD. Orthopaedic surgeons can consider VSS a HIPAA-compliant documentation option with time savings and no measurable difference in patient satisfaction. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level II: Randomized controlled trial.
BACKGROUND: Virtual scribe services (VSS) are a contemporary take on the in-person scribes utilized as a means to reduce administrative burden on physicians and enhance the physician-patient interaction. The purpose of this study was to determine whether VSS use could decrease the time an orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeon spends on documentation without diminishing the patient experience as compared with traditional postencounter dictation (TD). METHODS: Fifty patients presenting for first-time visits with a single orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeon were prospectively enrolled and randomized to VSS or TD prior to the physician-patient encounter. Time spent with the patient in the exam room and time spent documenting away from the patient were recorded. A postencounter survey assessed patient satisfaction, perception of physician empathy, understanding of the plan, and perception of the amount of time spent with the physician. RESULTS: Of 50 patients enrolled, 25 were randomized to VSS. Time spent documenting away from the patient differed significantly between VSS and TD (1.2 ± 0.7 minutes for VSS vs 5.8 ± 1.7 minutes for TD, P < .001) as did time elapsed between the end of the visit and the start of dictation (0 ± 0 for VSS vs 118.2 ± 72.7 minutes for TD, P < .001). There was a trend toward more time spent with the patient in the VSS group than in the TD group (14.2 ± 5.9 minutes for VSS vs 11.4 ± 5.1 minutes for TD, P = .069). There were no differences between groups in survey responses regarding satisfaction, empathy, understanding, or perception of sufficient time spent with the physician (P > .05 for each). CONCLUSIONS: VSS use in an orthopaedic foot and ankle practice significantly decreased documentation time and allowed for completion of documentation during patient visits without differences in quality metrics as compared to TD. Orthopaedic surgeons can consider VSS a HIPAA-compliant documentation option with time savings and no measurable difference in patient satisfaction. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level II: Randomized controlled trial.
Authors: Jordan R Pollock; M Lane Moore; Aaron C Llanes; Joseph C Brinkman; Justin L Makovicka; Donald L Dulle; Nathaniel B Hinckley; Anthony Barcia; Matthew Anastasi; Anikar Chhabra Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2022-04-08