Literature DB >> 32844367

Primary Care Providers' Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs, and Practice Related to Lung Cancer Screening in Five High-Risk Communities in New York City.

Jennifer Leng1,2, Shu Fang Lei3, Lei Lei3, Jeralyn Cortez3, John Capua3, Florence Lui3,4, Francesca Gany5,6.   

Abstract

Racial/ethnic minorities face stark inequalities in lung cancer incidence, treatment, survival, and mortality compared with US born non-Hispanic Whites. Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is effective at reducing lung cancer mortality in high-risk current and former smokers and is recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). This study sought to assess primary care providers' (PCPs') knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practice related to LCS and the recent USPSTF guidelines in five high-risk immigrant communities in New York City. We surveyed 83 eligible PCPs between December 2016 and January 2018 through surveys sent by mail, email, and fax, administered by phone or in person. The survey included questions about providers' clinical practice, knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs related to LCS and the USPSTF guidelines. Information about patient demographics, PCPs' training background, and practice type were also collected. Sixty-seven percent of respondents reported that they did not have established guidelines for LCS at their practice, and 52% expressed that "vague" screening criteria influenced their referral processes for LCS. Barriers to LCS with LDCT included concerns that LDCT is not covered by insurance, patients' fears of screening results, and patients' concerns regarding radiation exposure. Targeted educational interventions for both PCPs and patients may increase access to recommended LCS, especially for populations at disproportionate risk for lung cancer.
© 2020. American Association for Cancer Education.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immigrants; Low-dose computed tomography; Lung cancer screening; Minorities; Primary care providers

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 32844367      PMCID: PMC7904966          DOI: 10.1007/s13187-020-01857-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   1.771


  3 in total

1.  Improving smoking history documentation in the electronic health record for lung cancer risk assessment and screening in primary care: A case study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Peterson; Kathryn Harris; Farhood Farjah; Nkem Akinsoto; Leah M Marcotte
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2021-08-24

2.  A Lung Cancer Screening Education Program Impacts both Referral Rates and Provider and Medical Assistant Knowledge at Two Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Authors:  Aamna Akhtar; Ernesto Sosa; Samuel Castro; Melissa Sur; Vanessa Lozano; Gail D'Souza; Sophia Yeung; Jonjon Macalintal; Meghna Patel; Xiaoke Zou; Pei-Chi Wu; Ellen Silver; Jossie Sandoval; Stacy W Gray; Karen L Reckamp; Jae Y Kim; Virginia Sun; Dan J Raz; Loretta Erhunmwunsee
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2021-12-12       Impact factor: 4.840

3.  Deep Q-networks with web-based survey data for simulating lung cancer intervention prediction and assessment in the elderly: a quantitative study.

Authors:  Songjing Chen; Sizhu Wu
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.796

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.