Literature DB >> 32843941

Pay-for-performance challenges in family physician program.

F Gharibi1, E Dadgar2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to investigate the challenges faced in the implementation of the pay-for-performance system in Iran's family physician program. STUDY
DESIGN: Qualitative. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: The study was conducted with 32 key informants at the family physician program at the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences between May 2018 and June 2018. Method: This is a qualitative study. A purposeful sampling method was used with only one inclusion criterion for participants: five years of experience in the family physician program. The researchers conducted 17 individual and group non-structured interviews and examined participants' perspectives on the challenges faced in the implementation of the pay-for-performance system in the family physician program. Content analysis was conducted on the obtained data.
RESULTS: This study identified 7 themes, 14 sub-themes, and 46 items related to the challenges in the implementation of pay-for-performance systems in Iran's family physician program. The main themes are: workload, training, program cultivation, payment, assessment and monitoring, information management, and level of authority. Other sub-challenges were also identified.
CONCLUSION: The study results demonstrate some notable challenges faced in the implementation of the pay-for-performance system. This information can be helpful to managers and policymakers. © Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Iran; P4P; family physician; pay for performance

Year:  2020        PMID: 32843941      PMCID: PMC7430307     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Malays Fam Physician        ISSN: 1985-2274


  38 in total

1.  Inequality in quality: addressing socioeconomic, racial, and ethnic disparities in health care.

Authors:  K Fiscella; P Franks; M R Gold; C M Clancy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-05-17       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.

Authors:  M Leavitt
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-05

Review 3.  Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness.

Authors:  U H Graneheim; B Lundman
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  Pay for performance and beyond.

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 5.  What is the empirical basis for paying for quality in health care?

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal; Richard G Frank
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.929

6.  Antibiotic timing and errors in diagnosing pneumonia.

Authors:  James A Welker; Michelle Huston; Jack D McCue
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-02-25

7.  Impact of public reporting on unreported quality of care.

Authors:  Rachel M Werner; R Tamara Konetzka; Gregory B Kruse
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care.

Authors:  Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; Thérèse A Stukel; Daniel J Gottlieb; F L Lucas; Etoile L Pinder
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Pay for performance for the allergist-immunologist: potential promise and problems.

Authors:  Michael Schatz; Michael Blaiss; George Green; Donald Aaronson
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 10.793

10.  Impact of a pay-for-performance incentive on support for smoking cessation and on smoking prevalence among people with diabetes.

Authors:  Christopher Millett; Jeremy Gray; Sonia Saxena; Gopalakrishnan Netuveli; Azeem Majeed
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  1 in total

1.  Developing an Evaluation Model for Maternity Care: A Mixed-Method Study from Iran.

Authors:  Rozita Firooznia; Hossein Dargahi; Tohid Jafari-Koshki; Zeinab Khaledian
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.429

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.