| Literature DB >> 32843867 |
Jolene M Miller1, Stephanie Friree Ford2, Anna Yang3.
Abstract
Reflective practice is a strategy promoted as a way to improve professional performance and to develop expertise. Intentional reflection on work situations can lead to improved understanding of a specific situation, identify strategies for similar situations in the future, and uncover assumptions that hinder service to patrons. Research has identified lack of knowledge to be a barrier to health sciences librarians engaging in reflective practice. This article introduces the use of intentional reflection at work: what it is, how it helps, and how it can be applied in librarianship. It also provides practical advice on how to choose a format, how to use a model to guide reflection, and how to incorporate it into work.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32843867 PMCID: PMC7441907 DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2020.938
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Libr Assoc ISSN: 1536-5050
Using reflective practice for professional development
| Reflections | Applications |
|---|---|
| Professional development over the course of your career | What knowledge and skills do you need to learn to be successful in your current position? Your overall career goals? Consider using the |
| Before participating in a professional development activity | What do you want to get out of this activity? Is there something specific that you want to learn or explore? Someone you want to meet? An idea you want to discuss? |
| After the activity | What did you learn in the activity? If it does not match what you hoped to learn, what follow-up do you need to do to achieve your learning goals? |
| Special considerations for multiday meetings | The schedules of multiday meetings are often dawn-to-dusk meetings, papers, keynotes, networking, and more. Take time to reflect occasionally during the meeting. If this ends up as a simple “brain dump” with little reflection, that is okay. The key is to capture your thoughts and ideas. In-depth reflection can take place after the meeting. |
Situation, Evidence, Action (SEA)-Change model
| SEA-Change process phases | Characteristics of deep reflection process | |
|---|---|---|
| S: Situation | Trigger and/or catalyst: clearly defined and understood. | |
| E: Evidence | Assimilation of the evidence from the past or present. | |
| A: Action | Need for action identified based on above. | |
Adapted by permission of Barbara A. Sen.
Gibbs Reflective Cycle Model
| Description | Describe your experience. |
|---|---|
| Feelings |
How did you feel during and prior to the experience? How did you react? Describe your feelings after the experience. |
| Evaluation |
What worked and didn't work during the experience? What was the outcome of the experience? |
| Analysis |
Things that went well: Why do you think it went well? How can you improve for the future? Things that didn't go well: Why do you think it didn't go well? What could have been done to avoid this? Think about your contribution to the experience as well as others who were present. Explain if other's reactions were similar or different from yours. |
| Conclusion |
What could you have done differently? What did you learn from this experience, either positive or negative? How did the experience impact your current knowledge? |
| Action plan |
What do you need to do to have a better experience in the future? Even if the experience was positive, what can you improve on? What steps do you need to take to improve for the future? |
Used under Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License by Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford Brookes University, Wheatley Campus, Wheatley, Oxford, UK, OX33 1HX.
Figure 1Kim's Critical Reflective Inquiry Model