Literature DB >> 32843719

A mouse model for SARS-CoV-2 infection by exogenous delivery of hACE2 using alphavirus replicon particles.

Ya-Nan Zhang1, Xiao-Dan Li1,2, Zhe-Rui Zhang1, Hong-Qing Zhang1, Na Li1, Jing Liu1, Jia-Qi Li1, Hua-Jun Zhang1, Ze-Jun Wang3, Shuo Shen3, Zheng-Li Shi1, Hong-Ping Wei1, Zhi-Ming Yuan1, Han-Qing Ye4, Bo Zhang5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32843719      PMCID: PMC7445228          DOI: 10.1038/s41422-020-00405-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Res        ISSN: 1001-0602            Impact factor:   25.617


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Since the outbreak of a novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in late 2019, it has spread rapidly and developed into a global pandemic. As of August 12, 2020, more than 215 countries and territories around the world have reported more than 20.5 million confirmed COVID-19 cases with over 745,693 deaths (https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries). Such harsh conditions urged scientists across the world to gear up to develop vaccines and antiviral drugs against COVID-19, which also lead to massive requirement for experimental animals. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the causative pathogen of COVID-19. It has been demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 uses angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as cellular receptor for entry into target cells. Mouse model is the most commonly used animal model for studying human diseases. However, SARS-CoV-2 fails to invade and replicate in this traditional animal model due to the structural differences in mouse ACE2 (mACE2) compared with human ACE2 (hACE2),[1] which has become the major hurdle for COVID-19 study. Currently, several strategies have been developed to overcome this receptor incompatibility by: (i) generating transgenic mice bearing hACE2 receptor,[2-4] (ii) establishing adenovirus hACE2 mouse model with recombinant adenovirus expressing hACE2,[5] and (iii) adapting the SARS-CoV-2 by serial passages in the respiratory tract of mice.[6-8] In this study, we used an alternative strategy to generate a SARS-CoV-2-sensitive mouse model by exogenous delivery of hACE2 with Venezuelan equine encephalitis replicon particles (VEEV-VRP-hACE2) (Supplementary information, Fig. S1a). VEEV is a positive sense, single-stranded RNA virus which belongs to the genus Alphavirus, family Togaviridae. Alphavirus replicon particles (VRPs), including VEEV-VRPs, represent efficient vectors for gene delivery and have been applied to studies of vaccine development, gene therapy and cell transduction. They contain self-replicating RNA-encoding viral replicase proteins (nsP1-nsP4) and express the gene of interest in place of viral structural protein genes.[9] By providing viral structural proteins in trans, the replicon RNA is packaged into VEEV-VRPs for in vitro and in vivo gene delivery.[10] Due to their intrinsic biological properties, VEEV-VRPs offer several advantages with a broad range of susceptible host cells, high expression level of cytoplasmic proteins and easy manipulation of recombinant RNA molecules using cDNA clones.[10,11] Here, Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) replicon expressing hACE2 with a C-terminal S-tag was packaged into VRPs using the helper RNAs encoding VEEV capsid and envelope proteins to produce VEEV-VRP-hACE2 (Supplementary information, Fig. S1). MLE-12 cells (mouse lung type II epithelial cell line) were used to evaluate the availability of VEEV-VRP-hACE2 for SARS-CoV-2-sensitive cells establishment. After confirming hACE2 expression in MLE-12 cells transduced with VEEV-VRP-hACE2 (VRP-hACE2) through indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) (Fig. 1a) and western blotting (Fig. 1b), MLE-12 cells were administered with VEEV-VRP-hACE2 at 12 h prior to SARS-CoV-2 (WIV04)[1] infection. The SARS-CoV-2 NP-specific IFA-positive cells were only observed in VEEV-VRP-hACE2-transduced MLE-12 cells but not in the DMEM-treated cells (Fig. 1c). Similar results were obtained using BHK-21 cells (Fig. 1c). These results demonstrated that VEEV-VRP-hACE2 could efficiently deliver hACE2 in vitro and convert nonpermissive cells into SARS-CoV-2-permissive cells.
Fig. 1

Development of mouse model for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

a, b Expression of hACE2 was analyzed using IFA (a) and western blot assay (b) in MLE-12 cells transduced with VEEV-VRP-hACE2. c Transduction with VEEV-VRP-hACE2 converted nonpermissive MLE-12 cells and BHK-21 cells into SARS-CoV-2 permissive cells. d, e Viral RNA loads of lung tissues in VEEV-VRP-hACE2-transduced BALB/c (d) and C57BL/6 mice (e) after infection with SARS-CoV-2. f Viral RNA loads of different tissues in the BABL/c mice transduced with VEEV-VRP-hACE2 followed by SARS-CoV-2 infection. g White blood cells analysis in the peripheral blood collected from each group of BALB/c mice. h SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection in the lung tissues of BALB/c mice transduced with VEEV-VRP-hACE2 and infected with SARS-CoV-2 using anti-NP antibody. i H&E staining of lung samples from infected BALB/c mice at 4 dpi. j Viral RNA loads of lungs in BALB/c mice inoculated with CB6 at 2 days post challenge with SARS-CoV-2. k Viral RNA loads of lungs in BALB/c mice twice immunized with inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines at 2 days post challenge with SARS-CoV-2. Data were expressed as means ± SD, Student’s t test was used to analyze the differences between two groups. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Scale bars, 50 μm (a, c), 100 μm (h, i left), 50 μm (i right).

Development of mouse model for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

a, b Expression of hACE2 was analyzed using IFA (a) and western blot assay (b) in MLE-12 cells transduced with VEEV-VRP-hACE2. c Transduction with VEEV-VRP-hACE2 converted nonpermissive MLE-12 cells and BHK-21 cells into SARS-CoV-2 permissive cells. d, e Viral RNA loads of lung tissues in VEEV-VRP-hACE2-transduced BALB/c (d) and C57BL/6 mice (e) after infection with SARS-CoV-2. f Viral RNA loads of different tissues in the BABL/c mice transduced with VEEV-VRP-hACE2 followed by SARS-CoV-2 infection. g White blood cells analysis in the peripheral blood collected from each group of BALB/c mice. h SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection in the lung tissues of BALB/c mice transduced with VEEV-VRP-hACE2 and infected with SARS-CoV-2 using anti-NP antibody. i H&E staining of lung samples from infected BALB/c mice at 4 dpi. j Viral RNA loads of lungs in BALB/c mice inoculated with CB6 at 2 days post challenge with SARS-CoV-2. k Viral RNA loads of lungs in BALB/c mice twice immunized with inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines at 2 days post challenge with SARS-CoV-2. Data were expressed as means ± SD, Student’s t test was used to analyze the differences between two groups. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Scale bars, 50 μm (a, c), 100 μm (h, i left), 50 μm (i right). We then tested whether VEEV-VRP-hACE2 could in vivo deliver hACE2 to the respiratory tract of mouse and render susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Both BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice around 6- to 8-week-old were first administered with 106 IU VEEV-VRP-hACE2 or DMEM (negative control) in a volume of 80 μL DMEM through intranasal route. After 24 h, mice from different groups were inoculated intranasally with 105 PFU SARS-CoV-2, and then were monitored and weighted daily for 14 days. No obvious clinical symptoms and body weight loss were observed for mice in each group (Supplementary information, Fig. S2a). The viral replication dynamics in the lungs of mice were determined through quantification of viral genomic RNAs. As shown in Fig. 1d, e, viral RNAs remained at a steady high level (106–107 copies/g) in both BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice transduced with VEEV-VRP-hACE2 from day 1 to day 5 post infection and decreased to background levels (104 copies/g) on day 9 in transduced BALB/c mice (Supplementary information, Fig. S2b). In contrast, the continuous decline in viral RNA levels was observed in DMEM-treated mice over the whole experimental period (Fig. 1d, e). In VEEV-VRP-hACE2-transduced mice, viral RNAs were not detected in other organs such as heart, liver, spleen, kidney, brain and small intestine except for lung (Fig. 1f). NP antigen of SARS-CoV-2 was also observed in the lungs through IFA (Fig. 1h). Similar to the results reported in SARS-CoV-2-infected transgenic mice,[3] VEEV-VRP-hACE2-transduced, SARS-CoV-2-infected mice (VRP-hACE2+SARS-CoV-2) had a higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in the peripheral blood at 2 days post infection (dpi) compared with the mice infected with SARS-CoV-2 (SARS-CoV-2) or transduced with VEEV-VRP-hACE2 only (VRP-hACE2) (Fig. 1g). Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 infection induced the production of viral-specific IgG antibodies in the sera of VEEV-VRP-hACE2-transduced mice, as demonstrated by IFA at 21 dpi, in contrast to the negative IFA signals observed in SARS-CoV-2 only- and VEEV-VRP-hACE2 only-treated mice (Supplementary information, Fig. S2c). To characterize the pathological features caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection in VEEV-VRP-hACE2-transduced mice, histopathological analysis of lung sections from infected mice were performed (Fig. 1i). Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining showed that following SARS-CoV-2 infection, hACE2-transduced mice developed interstitial pneumonia (Fig. 1i) characterized with large area of alveolar septal thickening, part of alveoli atrophy (black arrow), large number of inflammatory cell infiltration around blood vessels and the bronchus (yellow arrow), and a small amount of epithelia/epithelioid cells detached from the bronchus (red arrow). In contrast, only small areas of alveolar septal thickening were observed in the lungs of mock-treated mice infected with SARS-CoV-2 or mice only transduced with VEEV-VRP-hACE2. These results suggested that VEEV-VRP-hACE2-transduced mice could support SARS-CoV-2 replication and develop similar pulmonary pathology to that observed in COVID-19 patients after SARS-CoV-2 infection. To further evaluate the availability of this mouse model for COVID-19 study, a human neutralizing antibody CB6 that is a potential agent for COVID-19[12] and an inactivated vaccine candidate that had entered clinical trials were chosen to examine their protective effects against SARS-CoV-2 infection using this mouse model. For CB6 protective assay, viral RNAs in the lungs of VEEV-VRP-hACE2-transduced mice were quantified at 3 d after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Consistent with previous study,[12] CB6 exhibited strong protective effects against SARS-CoV-2 infection as the viral RNAs of CB6 mAb treated group were more than twenty times lower than those of mock-treated group (Fig. 1j). Histopathological analysis of lung sections provided further evidence that in contrast to typical pulmonary features of COVID-19 lung disease displayed by mock-treated mice, no lesions were observed in antibody-treated group (Supplementary information, Fig. S2d). For vaccine protection assay, BALB/c mice were immunized twice with 5 μg inactivated vaccine through the intraperitoneal route at an interval of 14 days. The mice mock immunized with PBS were used as control. Apparent seroconversion was observed in vaccine-immunized mice at 14 days post boosting vaccination through ELISA and PRNT assays, while none of the mock-immunized mice seroconverted (Supplementary information, Fig. S2c). Following VEEV-VRP-hACE2 transduction, both groups of mice were challenged with 105 PFU SARS-CoV-2 via intranasal route. The inactivated vaccine significantly protected mice from SARS-CoV-2 infection, as dramatically decreased RNA copies were detected in the vaccine-immunized mice compared with those in the mock-immunized mice (Fig. 1k). Overall, these results show that the VEEV-VRP-hACE2-transduced mouse model can be rapidly established without any genetic manipulation (knock-out/in), and the productive viral replication and visible histopathology in transduced mice that mimic clinical COVID-19 illness allow us to test potential antiviral agents and vaccines using this model. Supplementary information, Methods and Figures
  9 in total

1.  Stable alphavirus packaging cell lines for Sindbis virus and Semliki Forest virus-derived vectors.

Authors:  J M Polo; B A Belli; D A Driver; I Frolov; S Sherrill; M J Hariharan; K Townsend; S Perri; S J Mento; D J Jolly; S M Chang; S Schlesinger; T W Dubensky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Alphavirus-based expression vectors: strategies and applications.

Authors:  I Frolov; T A Hoffman; B M Prágai; S A Dryga; H V Huang; S Schlesinger; C M Rice
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 in hACE2 transgenic mice.

Authors:  Linlin Bao; Wei Deng; Baoying Huang; Hong Gao; Jiangning Liu; Lili Ren; Qiang Wei; Pin Yu; Yanfeng Xu; Feifei Qi; Yajin Qu; Fengdi Li; Qi Lv; Wenling Wang; Jing Xue; Shuran Gong; Mingya Liu; Guanpeng Wang; Shunyi Wang; Zhiqi Song; Linna Zhao; Peipei Liu; Li Zhao; Fei Ye; Huijuan Wang; Weimin Zhou; Na Zhu; Wei Zhen; Haisheng Yu; Xiaojuan Zhang; Li Guo; Lan Chen; Conghui Wang; Ying Wang; Xinming Wang; Yan Xiao; Qiangming Sun; Hongqi Liu; Fanli Zhu; Chunxia Ma; Lingmei Yan; Mengli Yang; Jun Han; Wenbo Xu; Wenjie Tan; Xiaozhong Peng; Qi Jin; Guizhen Wu; Chuan Qin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A human neutralizing antibody targets the receptor-binding site of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Rui Shi; Chao Shan; Xiaomin Duan; Zhihai Chen; Peipei Liu; Jinwen Song; Tao Song; Xiaoshan Bi; Chao Han; Lianao Wu; Ge Gao; Xue Hu; Yanan Zhang; Zhou Tong; Weijin Huang; William Jun Liu; Guizhen Wu; Bo Zhang; Lan Wang; Jianxun Qi; Hui Feng; Fu-Sheng Wang; Qihui Wang; George Fu Gao; Zhiming Yuan; Jinghua Yan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  An alphavirus replicon particle chimera derived from venezuelan equine encephalitis and sindbis viruses is a potent gene-based vaccine delivery vector.

Authors:  Silvia Perri; Catherine E Greer; Kent Thudium; Barbara Doe; Harold Legg; Hong Liu; Raul E Romero; Zequn Tang; Qian Bin; Thomas W Dubensky; Michael Vajdy; Gillis R Otten; John M Polo
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin.

Authors:  Peng Zhou; Xing-Lou Yang; Xian-Guang Wang; Ben Hu; Lei Zhang; Wei Zhang; Hao-Rui Si; Yan Zhu; Bei Li; Chao-Lin Huang; Hui-Dong Chen; Jing Chen; Yun Luo; Hua Guo; Ren-Di Jiang; Mei-Qin Liu; Ying Chen; Xu-Rui Shen; Xi Wang; Xiao-Shuang Zheng; Kai Zhao; Quan-Jiao Chen; Fei Deng; Lin-Lin Liu; Bing Yan; Fa-Xian Zhan; Yan-Yi Wang; Geng-Fu Xiao; Zheng-Li Shi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 69.504

7.  Generation of a Broadly Useful Model for COVID-19 Pathogenesis, Vaccination, and Treatment.

Authors:  Jing Sun; Zhen Zhuang; Jian Zheng; Kun Li; Roy Lok-Yin Wong; Donglan Liu; Jicheng Huang; Jiangping He; Airu Zhu; Jingxian Zhao; Xiaobo Li; Yin Xi; Rongchang Chen; Abeer N Alshukairi; Zhao Chen; Zhaoyong Zhang; Chunke Chen; Xiaofang Huang; Fang Li; Xiaomin Lai; Dingbin Chen; Liyan Wen; Jianfen Zhuo; Yanjun Zhang; Yanqun Wang; Shuxiang Huang; Jun Dai; Yongxia Shi; Kui Zheng; Mariah R Leidinger; Jiekai Chen; Yimin Li; Nanshan Zhong; David K Meyerholz; Paul B McCray; Stanley Perlman; Jincun Zhao
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  A Mouse Model of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Shi-Hui Sun; Qi Chen; Hong-Jing Gu; Guan Yang; Yan-Xiao Wang; Xing-Yao Huang; Su-Su Liu; Na-Na Zhang; Xiao-Feng Li; Rui Xiong; Yan Guo; Yong-Qiang Deng; Wei-Jin Huang; Quan Liu; Quan-Ming Liu; Yue-Lei Shen; Yong Zhou; Xiao Yang; Tong-Yan Zhao; Chang-Fa Fan; Yu-Sen Zhou; Cheng-Feng Qin; You-Chun Wang
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 21.023

9.  Pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 in Transgenic Mice Expressing Human Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2.

Authors:  Ren-Di Jiang; Mei-Qin Liu; Ying Chen; Chao Shan; Yi-Wu Zhou; Xu-Rui Shen; Qian Li; Lei Zhang; Yan Zhu; Hao-Rui Si; Qi Wang; Juan Min; Xi Wang; Wei Zhang; Bei Li; Hua-Jun Zhang; Ralph S Baric; Peng Zhou; Xing-Lou Yang; Zheng-Li Shi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 41.582

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  Construction and evaluation of a self-replicative RNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 using yellow fever virus replicon.

Authors:  Akina Nakamura; Tomohiro Kotaki; Yurie Nagai; Shunta Takazawa; Kenzo Tokunaga; Masanori Kameoka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 2.  In Vitro and In Vivo Models for Studying SARS-CoV-2, the Etiological Agent Responsible for COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Rafael B Rosa; Willyenne M Dantas; Jessica C F do Nascimento; Murilo V da Silva; Ronaldo N de Oliveira; Lindomar J Pena
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 5.048

3.  Role of neutrophil chemoattractant CXCL5 in SARS-CoV-2 infection-induced lung inflammatory innate immune response in an in vivo hACE2 transfection mouse model.

Authors:  Yan Liang; Heng Li; Jing Li; Ze-Ning Yang; Jia-Li Li; Hui-Wen Zheng; Yan-Li Chen; Hai-Jing Shi; Lei Guo; Long-Ding Liu
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2020-11-18

Review 4.  Immune responses to human respiratory coronaviruses infection in mouse models.

Authors:  Zhen Zhuang; Donglan Liu; Jing Sun; Fang Li; Jincun Zhao
Journal:  Curr Opin Virol       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 7.090

Review 5.  Multimeric RNAs for efficient RNA-based therapeutics and vaccines.

Authors:  Dajeong Kim; Sangwoo Han; Yoonbin Ji; Sunghyun Moon; Hyangsu Nam; Jong Bum Lee
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 11.467

Review 6.  Review of selected animal models for respiratory coronavirus infection and its application in drug research.

Authors:  Shengle Qin; Runfeng Li; Zhaoguang Zheng; Xuxin Zeng; Yutao Wang; Xinhua Wang
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 20.693

7.  SARS-CoV-2 envelope protein causes acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)-like pathological damages and constitutes an antiviral target.

Authors:  Bingqing Xia; Xurui Shen; Yang He; Xiaoyan Pan; Feng-Liang Liu; Yi Wang; Feipu Yang; Sui Fang; Yan Wu; Zilei Duan; Xiaoli Zuo; Zhuqing Xie; Xiangrui Jiang; Ling Xu; Hao Chi; Shuangqu Li; Qian Meng; Hu Zhou; Yubo Zhou; Xi Cheng; Xiaoming Xin; Lin Jin; Hai-Lin Zhang; Dan-Dan Yu; Ming-Hua Li; Xiao-Li Feng; Jiekai Chen; Hualiang Jiang; Gengfu Xiao; Yong-Tang Zheng; Lei-Ke Zhang; Jingshan Shen; Jia Li; Zhaobing Gao
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 46.297

8.  Low toxicity and high immunogenicity of an inactivated vaccine candidate against COVID-19 in different animal models.

Authors:  Ze-Jun Wang; Hua-Jun Zhang; Jia Lu; Kang-Wei Xu; Cheng Peng; Jing Guo; Xiao-Xiao Gao; Xin Wan; Wen-Hui Wang; Chao Shan; Su-Cai Zhang; Jie Wu; An-Na Yang; Yan Zhu; Ao Xiao; Lei Zhang; Lie Fu; Hao-Rui Si; Qian Cai; Xing-Lou Yang; Lei You; Yan-Ping Zhou; Jing Liu; De-Qing Pang; Wei-Ping Jin; Xiao-Yu Zhang; Sheng-Li Meng; Yun-Xia Sun; Ulrich Desselberger; Jun-Zhi Wang; Xin-Guo Li; Kai Duan; Chang-Gui Li; Miao Xu; Zheng-Li Shi; Zhi-Ming Yuan; Xiao-Ming Yang; Shuo Shen
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 7.163

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.