Literature DB >> 32843508

Prediction of Mortality With the Use of Noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Failure.

Francesca Innocenti1, Laura Giordano2, Simona Gualtieri2, Arianna Gandini2, Lucia Taurino2, Monica Nesa2, Chiara Gigli2, Alessandro Becucci2, Alessandro Coppa2, Irene Tassinari2, Maurizio Zanobetti2, Francesca Caldi2, Riccardo Pini2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In actuality, it is difficult to obtain an early prognostic stratification for patients with acute respiratory failure treated with noninvasive ventilation (NIV). We tested whether an early evaluation through a predictive scoring system could identify subjects at risk of in-hospital mortality or NIV failure.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study, which included all the subjects with acute respiratory failure who required NIV admitted to an emergency department-high-dependence observation unit between January 2014 and December 2017. The HACOR (heart rate, acidosis [by using pH], consciousness [by using the Glasgow coma scale], oxygenation [by using [Formula: see text]/[Formula: see text]], respiratory rate) score was calculated before the NIV initiation (T0) and after 1 h (T1) and 24 h (T24) of treatment. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and NIV failure, defined as the need for invasive ventilation.
RESULTS: The study population included 644 subjects, 463 with hypercapnic respiratory failure and an overall in-hospital mortality of 23%. Thirty-six percent of all the subjects had NIV as the "ceiling" treatment. At all the evaluations, nonsurvivors had a higher mean ± SD HACOR score than did the survivors (T0, 8.2 ± 4.9 vs 6.1 ± 4.0; T1, 6.6 ± 4.8 vs 3.8 ± 3.4; T24, 5.3 ± 4.5 vs 2.0 ± 2.3 [all P < .001]). These data were confirmed after the exclusion of the subjects who underwent NIV as the ceiling treatment (T0, 8.2 ± 4.9 vs 6.1 ± 4.0 [P = .002]; T1, 6.6 ± 4.8 vs 3.8 ± 3.4; T24, 5.3 ± 4.5 vs 2.0 ± 3.2 [all P < .001]). At T24, an HACOR score > 5 (Relative Risk [RR] 2.39, 95% CI 1.60-3.56) was associated with an increased mortality rate, independent of age and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score.
CONCLUSIONS: Among the subjects treated with NIV for acute respiratory failure, the HACOR score seemed to be a useful tool to identify those at risk of in-hospital mortality.
Copyright © 2020 by Daedalus Enterprises.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute respiratory failure; emergency department; noninvasive ventilation; organ failure; prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32843508     DOI: 10.4187/respcare.07464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Care        ISSN: 0020-1324            Impact factor:   2.258


  6 in total

1.  The HACOR Score Predicts Worse in-Hospital Prognosis in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19.

Authors:  Massimo Raffaele Mannarino; Vanessa Bianconi; Elena Cosentini; Filippo Figorilli; Costanza Natali; Giulia Cellini; Cecilia Colangelo; Francesco Giglioni; Marco Braca; Matteo Pirro
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 2.  Oxygen administration for patients with ARDS.

Authors:  Shinichiro Ohshimo
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2021-02-06

3.  Comparison of ROX and HACOR scales to predict high-flow nasal cannula failure in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.

Authors:  Carlos Fernando Valencia; Oscar David Lucero; Onofre Casas Castro; Andrey Alexandrovich Sanko; Peter Alfonso Olejua
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Prediction of Conventional Oxygen Therapy Failure in COVID-19 Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure by Assessing Serum Lactate Concentration, PaO2/FiO2 Ratio, and Body Temperature.

Authors:  Simon E Fridman; Pasquale Di Giampietro; Annamaria Sensoli; Michelle Beleffi; Cristina Bucce; Veronica Salvatore; Fabrizio Giostra; Alice Gianstefani
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-07

5.  Role of prognostic scores in predicting in-hospital mortality and failure of non-invasive ventilation in adults with COVID-19.

Authors:  Francesca Innocenti; Cristian Lazzari; Elisa Paolucci; Anna De Paris; Alessia Lagomarsini; Federica Guerra; Patrizia Alleonato; Lisa Casalini; Michele Buggea; Francesca Caldi; Maurizio Zanobetti; Filippo Pieralli; Giulia Guazzini; Lisa Lastraioli; Fabio Luise; Alessandro Milia; Lucia Sammicheli; Lucia Maddaluni; Federico Lavorini; Riccardo Pini
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 5.472

6.  Usefulness of the HACOR score in predicting success of CPAP in COVID-19-related hypoxemia.

Authors:  Miguel Filipe Guia; José Pedro Boléo-Tomé; Pasquale Imitazione; Giorgio Emanuele Polistina; Carlos Alves; Oki Ishikawa; Matthew Ballenberger; Bushra Mina; Giuseppe Fiorentino; Antonio Esquinas; Raffaele Scala
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 4.582

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.