Kelsey C Hewitt1, Sandra Rodgin2,3, David W Loring1,4, Alison E Pritchard2,3, Lisa A Jacobson2,3. 1. Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. 2. Department of Neuropsychology, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Abstract
Objectives: In response to the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, traditional, in-person neuropsychological assessment services paused in most settings. Neuropsychologists have sought to establish new guidelines and care models using telehealth neuropsychology (teleNP) services. The need to adapt to remote technology became the most difficult challenge to date for existing practice models. Results: Primary considerations for transitioning to teleNP include scope and limitations of the telehealth modality, informed consent for telehealth services, patient privacy and confidentiality, test security, and validity of telehealth assessments. Given timelines for fully re-opening clinical settings, access to traditional models of neuropsychological care remains unclear. These considerations will remain relevant even upon return to an in-office practice, as many assessment models will likely continue with teleNP to some extent. Specialists will need to consider the unique needs of their populations in ensuring quality care, as diagnostic differences and patient age will impact participation in teleNP. Conclusions: As the COVID-19 pandemic lingers, teleNP presents an opportunity as well as a challenge for neuropsychologists looking to provide patient care in the context of social distancing and stay-at-home restrictions. In this transformative time, the field of neuropsychology has opportunities to advance beyond traditional settings and focus on alternative delivery of patient care.
Objectives: In response to the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, traditional, in-person neuropsychological assessment services paused in most settings. Neuropsychologists have sought to establish new guidelines and care models using telehealth neuropsychology (teleNP) services. The need to adapt to remote technology became the most difficult challenge to date for existing practice models. Results: Primary considerations for transitioning to teleNP include scope and limitations of the telehealth modality, informed consent for telehealth services, patient privacy and confidentiality, test security, and validity of telehealth assessments. Given timelines for fully re-opening clinical settings, access to traditional models of neuropsychological care remains unclear. These considerations will remain relevant even upon return to an in-office practice, as many assessment models will likely continue with teleNP to some extent. Specialists will need to consider the unique needs of their populations in ensuring quality care, as diagnostic differences and patient age will impact participation in teleNP. Conclusions: As the COVID-19 pandemic lingers, teleNP presents an opportunity as well as a challenge for neuropsychologists looking to provide patient care in the context of social distancing and stay-at-home restrictions. In this transformative time, the field of neuropsychology has opportunities to advance beyond traditional settings and focus on alternative delivery of patient care.
Entities:
Keywords:
Teleneuropsychology; healthcare delivery; practice models; telehealth; telemedicine
Authors: David W Loring; Russell M Bauer; Lucia Cavanagh; Daniel L Drane; Laura Glass Umfleet; Dustin Wahlstrom; Fiona Whelan; Keith F Widaman; Robert M Bilder; Kristen D Enriquez; Steven P Reise; KuoChung Shih Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Katherine L Zane; Nicholas S Thaler; Shannon E Reilly; James J Mahoney; David M Scarisbrick Journal: Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2020-12-28 Impact factor: 3.535
Authors: Nadine A Kasparian; Anjali Sadhwani; Renee Sananes; Elizabeth Blumenfeld; Jennifer L Butcher; Adam R Cassidy; Stephany M Cox; Joslyn Kenowitz; Thomas A Miller; Jacqueline H Sanz; Kelly R Wolfe; Dawn Ilardi Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 1.093