| Literature DB >> 32842659 |
Pham Trung San1, Chau Minh Khanh1, Huynh Hoang Nhu Khanh1, Truong Anh Khoa1, Nguyen Hoang1, Le Thi Nhung1, Nguyen Thi Kieu Trinh1, Thanh-Danh Nguyen2.
Abstract
k-Oligocarrageenan (OC) is an effective biostimulator and a protector against disease infections for plants. However, the effect of OC molecular weight (MW) on plant growth is not fully understood. In this work, OCs with three different MWs (42, 17 and 4 kDa) was prepared by varying the degradation reaction time using ascorbic acid as a reagent. The product structure was confirmed by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) data. The growth promotion for maize (Zea mays L.) plants was investigated by foliar spray application of the prepared OCs. Field trials were carried out in two years, 2018 and 2019. The results showed that among treatments, OC with 4 kDa exhibited the best performance in both crop growth and grain yield parameters which indicated increases compared to the control in plant height (6.9-19.9%), length of ears (12.2%), diameter of ears (9.1%), fresh grain weight (17.8%), dry grain weight (20.0%) and grain yield (21.3%). Moreover, low MW OC augmented NP uptake in the plant growth while no effect on K uptake was observed. Therefore, OC with low MWs is potentially promising to apply as a promoter to enhance yield of crops.Entities:
Keywords: grain yield; hybrid maize (Zea mays L.); molecule weight; oligocarrageenan; plant growth; promoter
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32842659 PMCID: PMC7503339 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25173825
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Influence of hydrolysis time on the molecular weight of oligocarrageenan.
Figure 2FTIR spectra of oligocarrageenans with different molecular weights.
Figure 3Influence of MWs on height of maize plant collected in 2018 (A) and 2019 (B). Bars represent mean values of three replicates ± standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Influence of MWs on length of ear (A) and diameter of ear (B) collected in 2018 and 2019. Bars represent mean values of three replicates ± standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Influence of MWs on fresh (A) and dry (B) grain weights per ear and yield of grain (C) collected in 2018 and 2019. Bars represent mean values of three replicates ± standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 6Influence of MWs on number of rows per ear (A) and number of grains per row (B) and number of grains per ear (C) collected in 2018 and 2019. Bars represent mean values of three replicates ± standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 7Influence of MWs on nutrient uptake determined in leaves (A,B), in trunk (C,D) and in grain (E,F) collected in 2018 (left) and 2019 (right). Bars represent mean values of three replicates ± standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 8Field experiment design for biostimulator treatment of hybrid maize.