OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of texture analysis for differentiation between benign from malignant adrenal lesions on contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT). METHODS: After institutional review board approval, a retrospective analysis was performed, including an electronic search of pathology records for all biopsied adrenal lesions. Patients were included if they also had a contrast-enhanced abdominal CT in the portal venous phase. Computed tomographic images were manually segmented, and texture analysis of the segmented tumors was performed. Texture analysis results of benign and malignant tumors were compared, and areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five patients were included in the analysis. Excellent discriminators of benign from malignant lesions were identified, including entropy and standard deviation. These texture features demonstrated lower values for benign lesions compared with malignant lesions. Entropy values of benign lesions averaged 3.95 using a spatial scaling factor of 4 compared with an average of 5.08 for malignant lesions (P < .0001). Standard deviation values of benign lesions averaged 19.94 on the unfiltered image compared with an average of 34.32 for malignant lesions (P < .0001). Entropy demonstrated AUCs ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 for discriminating tumors, with sensitivities and specificities ranging from 81% to 95% and 88% to 100%, respectively. Standard deviation demonstrated AUCs ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 for discriminating tumors, with sensitivities and specificities ranging from 73% to 93% and 86% to 95%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Texture analysis offers a noninvasive tool for differentiating benign from malignant adrenal tumors on contrast-enhanced CT images. These results support the further development of texture analysis as a quantitative biomarker for characterizing adrenal tumors.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of texture analysis for differentiation between benign from malignant adrenal lesions on contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT). METHODS: After institutional review board approval, a retrospective analysis was performed, including an electronic search of pathology records for all biopsied adrenal lesions. Patients were included if they also had a contrast-enhanced abdominal CT in the portal venous phase. Computed tomographic images were manually segmented, and texture analysis of the segmented tumors was performed. Texture analysis results of benign and malignant tumors were compared, and areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five patients were included in the analysis. Excellent discriminators of benign from malignant lesions were identified, including entropy and standard deviation. These texture features demonstrated lower values for benign lesions compared with malignant lesions. Entropy values of benign lesions averaged 3.95 using a spatial scaling factor of 4 compared with an average of 5.08 for malignant lesions (P < .0001). Standard deviation values of benign lesions averaged 19.94 on the unfiltered image compared with an average of 34.32 for malignant lesions (P < .0001). Entropy demonstrated AUCs ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 for discriminating tumors, with sensitivities and specificities ranging from 81% to 95% and 88% to 100%, respectively. Standard deviation demonstrated AUCs ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 for discriminating tumors, with sensitivities and specificities ranging from 73% to 93% and 86% to 95%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Texture analysis offers a noninvasive tool for differentiating benign from malignant adrenal tumors on contrast-enhanced CT images. These results support the further development of texture analysis as a quantitative biomarker for characterizing adrenal tumors.
Authors: A De Leo; G Vara; G Di Dalmazi; C Mosconi; A Paccapelo; C Balacchi; V Vicennati; L Tucci; U Pagotto; S Selva; C Ricci; L Alberici; F Minni; C Nanni; F Ambrosi; D Santini; R Golfieri Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2022-06-10 Impact factor: 5.467