Literature DB >> 32841538

Impact on postoperative complications of changes in skeletal muscle mass during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastro-oesophageal cancer.

R B den Boer1, K I Jones2, S Ash2, G I van Boxel3, R S Gillies2, T O'Donnell2, J P Ruurda1, B Sgromo2, M A Silva2, N D Maynard2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Risk assessment is relevant to predict postoperative outcomes in patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer. This cohort study aimed to assess body composition changes during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and investigate their association with postoperative complications.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery with curative intent between 2016 and 2019 were identified from a specific database and included in the study. CT images before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were used to assess the skeletal muscle index, sarcopenia, and subcutaneous and visceral fat index.
RESULTS: In a cohort of 199 patients, the mean skeletal muscle index decreased during neoadjuvant therapy (from 51·187 to 49·19 cm2 /m2 ; P < 0·001) and the rate of sarcopenia increased (from 42·2 to 54·3 per cent; P < 0·001). A skeletal muscle index decrease greater than 5 per cent was not associated with an increased risk of total postoperative complications (odds ratio 0·91, 95 per cent c.i. 0·52 to 1·59; P = 0·736) or severe complications (odds ratio 0·66, 0·29 to 1·53; P = 0·329).
CONCLUSION: Skeletal muscle index decreased during neoadjuvant therapy but was not associated with postoperative complications.
© 2020 The Authors. BJS Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Journal of Surgery Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32841538      PMCID: PMC7528528          DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJS Open        ISSN: 2474-9842


Introduction

Gastro‐oesophageal cancer surgery is still associated with high rates of postoperative morbidity . Historically, cancers affecting the upper gastrointestinal tract are associated with significant malnutrition, which may in part explain the increased surgical morbidity observed . The majority of patients with surgically resectable disease receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy . It has been suggested that neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) may contribute to alterations in body composition, including a reduction in muscle mass, leading to increased postoperative morbidity , . Sarcopenia is the progressive and generalized loss of muscle mass and function. It is most commonly associated with ageing, but cancer cachexia can also contribute . Although dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry is the most accurate method for measuring lean muscle mass, alternative methods have been proposed, including CT, which is performed routinely for cancer staging. Recent systematic reviews , have demonstrated that preoperative CT‐assessed sarcopenia is predictive for postoperative complications and disease‐specific mortality in patients with oesophageal and gastric cancer. Sarcopenia is potentially modifiable, and may be targeted with prehabilitation strategies. Loss of muscle mass during NAT is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in metastatic colonic and ovarian cancer, but results in gastro‐oesophageal cancer have been inconsistent , . The primary aim of this study was to assess changes in body composition during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to determine its predictive value for postoperative complications in patients with gastro‐oesophageal cancer.

Methods

The study was approved by the National Research Ethics Committee (Integrated Research Application System number 260643, research ethics committee reference 19/LO/1871). Consecutive patients with gastro‐oesophageal cancer who had neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection between March 2016 and June 2019 were identified for eligibility from a specific database. Patients were included if they had a diagnosis of gastric or oesophageal cancer, were over 18 years old and had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery with curative intent. Patients without eligible CT images for assessment of body composition before and after NAT were excluded. Clinicopathological data included age, height, weight, ASA grade, co‐morbidity, tumour site, stage and cell type, chemotherapy details (regimen and cycles received) and surgical details (procedure subtype and approach). Complications were collected according to an international consensus statement and scored using the Clavien–Dindo classification method , . Thirty‐ and 90‐day mortality rates and overall survival data were obtained from the same database.

Measurement of body composition

CT scans obtained before NAT and before surgery were analysed. A cross‐sectional slice at the level of L3 was extracted and analysed by CoreSlicer (https://coreslicer.com/), a validated web‐based tool to assess body composition semiautomatically. The CoreSlicer tool uses Hounsfield unit ranges of −190 to −30 for fat tissue and − 29 to 150 for skeletal muscle . Body composition was assessed by two independent and blinded investigators. All musculature and adipose tissue was analysed. Final images of the results of body composition assessment were checked for accuracy by another blinded researcher. The muscle area was divided by the height squared to calculate the skeletal muscle index (SMI) (cm2/m2) . Similarly, visceral and subcutaneous fat indices were calculated. The SMI limit for sarcopenia was less than 52·4 cm2/m2 for men and less than 38·5 cm2/m2 for women, according to cut‐off values used elsewhere . Changes in SMI during NAT were calculated, and patients divided into two groups: SMI decrease during NAT of 5 per cent or less and more than 5 per cent.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed in SPSS® version 25.0 (IBM, Armonk, New York, USA). Continuous variables were tested for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Normally distributed data are presented as mean(s.d.) values, and non‐normally distributed data as median (i.q.r.) values. To compare paired patient groups the paired t test was used for normally distributed data, Wilcoxon test for non‐normally distributed data, and McNemar's test for binomial data. In non‐paired groups an independent Student's t test, Mann–Whitney U test and the χ2 test were used for normally distributed, non‐normally distributed and binomial data respectively. Fisher's exact test was used instead of the χ2 test when two or more cells included fewer than five events. The χ2 test was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with binomial variables in the univariable analysis. Ultimately, logistic regression analysis was used for the multiple regression analyses of postoperative complications. Variables with clinical relevance were deemed eligible for inclusion in the multiple regression analysis.

Results

Characteristics of the included patients are presented in Table  . After exclusion of one patient without eligible CT images, a total of 199 patients were included. The majority were men (79·4 per cent) and most tumours were located at the gastro‐oesophageal junction (53·3 per cent). The remaining patients had either oesophageal (34·2 per cent) or gastric (12·6 per cent) tumours. Some 177 patients (88·9 per cent) had an open surgical procedure and 22 (11·1 per cent) of the operations were laparoscopic or thoracoscopically assisted.
Table 1

Patient characteristics

Decrease in SMI (%)
Total (n = 199) ≤ 5 (n = 108) > 5 (n = 91) P
Age (years) * 66·1 (28·4–80·0)65·6 (45·3–80·0)67·6 (33·5–79·5)0·009
No. of men 158 (79·4)77 (71·3)81 (89)0·002
ASA grade 0·614
I16 (8·0)10 (9·3)6 (7)
II128 (64·3)69 (63·9)59 (65)
III55 (27·6)29 (26·9)26 (29)
Co‐morbidity
None54 (27·1)33 (30·6)21 (23)0·237
Cardiovascular100 (50·3)46 (42·6)54 (59)0·019
Chronic renal disease6 (3·0)5 (4·6)1 (1)0·147
Cerebral/peripheral vascular disease15 (7·5)8 (7·4)7 (8)0·940
Liver failure/cirrhosis1 (0·5)1 (0·9)0 (0)1·000
Barrett's oesophagus28 (14·1)11 (10·2)17 (19)0·086
Diabetes28 (14·1)11 (10·2)17 (19)0·086
Chronic respiratory disease37 (18·6)18 (16·7)19 (21)0·447
Other significant co‐morbidity44 (22·1)24 (22·2)20 (22)0·967
Cell type 0·313
Invasive adenocarcinoma189 (95·0)101 (93·5)88 (97)
Adenosquamous carcinoma8 (4·0)6 (5·6)2 (2)
Squamous cell carcinoma2 (1·0)1 (0·9)1 (1)
T category 0·841
T11 (0·5)0 (0)1 (1)
T262 (31·2)35 (32·4)27 (30)
T3107 (54·3)57 (52·8)50 (55)
T428 (14·1)15 (13·9)13 (14)
Missing1 (0·5)1 (0·1)0 (0)
N category 0·328
N073 (36·7)43 (39·8)30 (33)
N178 (39·2)40 (37·0)38 (42)
N240 (20·1)21 (19·4)19 (21)
N37 (3·5)3 (2·8)4 (4)
Missing1 (0·5)1 (0·9)0 (0)
M category 0·356
M0197 (99·0)106 (98·1)91 (100)
M11 (0·5)1 (0·9)0 (0)
Missing1 (0·5)1 (0·9)0 (0)
Tumour site 0·814
Oesophagus68 (34·2)37 (34·3)31 (34)
Gastro‐oesophageal junction106 (53·3)56 (51·9)50 (55)
Stomach25 (12·6)15 (13·9)10 (11)
Tumour subsite 0·900
Lower third68 (34·2)37 (34·3)31 (34)
Siewert 154 (27·1)29 (26·9)25 (27)
Siewert 237 (18·6)19 (17·6)18 (20)
Siewert 316 (8·0)9 (8·3)7 (8)
Body14 (7·0)5 (4·6)9 (10)
Antrum4 (2·0)4 (3·7)0 (0)
Pylorus5 (2·5)4 (3·7)1 (1)
Missing1 (0·5)1 (0·9)0 (0)
Regimen 0·107
CX55 (27·6)23 (21·3)32 (35)
ECX94 (47·2)56 (51·9)38 (42)
Other50 (25·1)29 (26·9)21 (23)
Cycles of chemotherapy 0·248
110 (5·0)7 (6·5)3 (3)
266 (33·2)29 (26·9)37 (41)
3122 (61·3)72 (66·7)50 (55)
41 (0·5)0 (0·0)1 (1)
Feeding tube during NAT
Jejunostomy45 (22·6)25 (23·1)20 (22)0·844§
Nasogastric tube3 (1·5)2 (1·9)1 (1)0·644§
Procedure type 0·320
Left thoracoabdominal approach89 (44·7)46 (42·6)43 (47)
2‐phase (Ivor Lewis)55 (27·6)30 (27·8)25 (27)
3‐phase (McKeown)6 (3·0)3 (2·8)3 (3)
Thoracotomy (open and shut)3 (1·5)3 (2·8)0 (0)
Total gastrectomy11 (5·5)5 (4·6)6 (7)
Extended total gastrectomy11 (5·5)4 (3·7)7 (8)
Distal gastrectomy13 (6·5)11 (10·2)2 (2)
Laparotomy (open and shut)11 (5·5)6 (5·6)5 (5)
Approach 0·978
Open operation177 (88·9)96 (88·9)81 (89)
Laparoscopic/thoracoscopic22 (11·1)12 (11·1)10 (11)
Time of CT before event (days)†
Before start of NAT35 (25–46)36 (25–47)34 (23–45)0·254
Before surgery30 (21–39)30 (21–40)32 (26–40)0·115
Time between scans105 (75–135)107 (91–123)104 (91–118)0·194

Values in parentheses are percentages unless indicated otherwise; values are

median (range) and †median (i.q.r.). SMI, skeletal muscle index; (E)CX, (epirubicin)–cisplatin–capecitabine; NAT, neoadjuvant therapy.

Mann–Whitney U test, except §χ2 test.

Patient characteristics Values in parentheses are percentages unless indicated otherwise; values are median (range) and †median (i.q.r.). SMI, skeletal muscle index; (E)CX, (epirubicin)–cisplatincapecitabine; NAT, neoadjuvant therapy. Mann–Whitney U test, except §χ2 test. Body composition changes during neoadjuvant therapy Values are median (i.q.r.) unless indicated otherwise; values are mean(s.d.); values in parentheses are percentages. NAT, neoadjuvant therapy; SMI, skeletal muscle index; SMA, skeletal muscle area; SFI, subcutaneous fat index; SFA, subcutaneous fat area; VFI, visceral fat index; VFA, visceral fat area. Wilcoxon test, except paired t test and McNemar test. Patient groups with an SMI decrease of 5 per cent or less and more than 5 per cent are compared in Table  . Patients with a higher rate of muscle mass depletion were significantly older than those with a lower rate (median 67·6 versus 65·6 years respectively; P = 0·009) and were more likely to be men (89·0 versus 71·3 per cent respectively; P = 0·002). In addition, the patients with a higher rate of muscle depletion had a higher percentage of cardiovascular co‐morbidity (59·3 versus 42·6 per cent; P = 0·019). The median interval from staging CT to the start of neoadjuvant therapy was 35 (i.q.r. 25–46) days. The median interval from preoperative CT to surgery was 30 (i.q.r. 21–39) days. There were no significant differences between the groups in the timing of staging CT (P = 0·254) or preoperative CT (P = 0·115) (Table  ). The median interval between staging and preoperative CT was 105 (i.q.r. 75–135) days, and a majority of patients (122, 61·3 per cent) received three cycles of chemotherapy (Table  ).

Body composition changes during neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Baseline characteristics demonstrated a population with a median BMI of 25·75 and 27·41 kg/m2 for women and men respectively. Some 132 (66·3 per cent) of the 199 included patients were overweight (BMI 25 kg/m2 or above) (Table  ). In total, 108 patients (54·3 per cent) had a SMI decrease of 5 per cent or less and 91 (45·7 per cent) lost more than 5 per cent (Table  and Fig.  ). In men, the mean SMI decreased by 5·9 per cent (from 54·46 to 51·27 cm2/m2; P < 0·001) (Table  , supporting information). In women, there was a 1·7 per cent decrease in SMI, which was not statistically significant (from 41·87 to 41·15 cm2/m2; P = 0·107). Before the start of NAT, 17 of the 41 women (41 per cent) and 67 of the 158 men (42·4 per cent) were sarcopenic. Before surgery this increased to 19 (46 per cent) and 89 (56·3 per cent) respectively. This increase in sarcopenia was significant only for men (P < 0·001). Changes in subcutaneous and visceral fat mass are shown in Table  (supporting information).
Table 2

Body composition changes during neoadjuvant therapy

Before NAT (n = 199) Before surgery (n = 199) P
Height (m)* 1·70(0·09)
Weight (kg)78·35 (67·33–89·38)
BMI (kg/m2)27·03 (23·78–30·28)
SMI (cm2/m2)* 51·87(10·31)49·19(9·71)< 0·001§
SMA (cm2)* 150·41(33·61)142·60(31·94)< 0·001§
Sarcopenia 84 (42·2)108 (54·3)< 0·001
SFI (cm2/m2)67·11 (42·59–91·65)59·10 (41·54–76·67)< 0·001
SFA (cm2)165·09 (113·2–216·97)172·40 (123·65–221·15)  0·617
VFI (cm2/m2)61·81 (37·30–86·32)60·76 (37·55–83·97)  0·063
VFA (cm2)177·15 (37·82–196·49)167·48 (98·60–236·36)  0·060

Values are median (i.q.r.) unless indicated otherwise;

values are mean(s.d.);

values in parentheses are percentages. NAT, neoadjuvant therapy; SMI, skeletal muscle index; SMA, skeletal muscle area; SFI, subcutaneous fat index; SFA, subcutaneous fat area; VFI, visceral fat index; VFA, visceral fat area.

Wilcoxon test, except

paired t test and

McNemar test.

Fig. 1

Waterfall plot of the difference per 100 days in skeletal muscle index during neoadjuvant therapy in 199 patients SMI, skeletal muscle index.

Waterfall plot of the difference per 100 days in skeletal muscle index during neoadjuvant therapy in 199 patients SMI, skeletal muscle index.

Postoperative complications

In total, 101 patients (50·8 per cent) had at least one postoperative complication (Clavien–Dindo grade I–V), and 27 (13·6 per cent) had a severe complication (grade IIIa or above) (Table  ). Pneumonia was the most common postoperative complication, with 52 cases (26·1 per cent). Thirty‐ and 90‐day mortality occurred in only two (1·0 per cent) and three (1·5 per cent) patients respectively. When comparing patients with a change in SMI of more than 5 per cent or 5 per cent or less, no significant differences were detected between the two groups regarding total (49 versus 51·9 per cent respectively; P = 0·736) and severe (11 versus 15·7 per cent; P = 0·329) complications. A significant difference was found in the incidence of wound infection, with a higher rate in patients with an SMI change of 5 per cent or less (9·3 per cent versus 0 per cent in the group with a greater decrease in SMI; P = 0·003).
Table 3

Overview of postoperative complications and mortality

Decrease in SMI (%)
Total (n = 199)≤ 5 (n = 108)> 5 (n = 91) P *
Complications
Total complications (CD I–V)101 (50·8)56 (51·9)45 (49)0·736
Severe complications (CD ≥ IIIa)27 (13·6)17 (15·7)10 (11)0·329
Anastomotic leak8 (4·0)7 (6·5)1 (1)0·054
Pneumonia52 (26·1)29 (26·9)23 (25)0·801
Pleural effusion14 (7·0)11 (10·2)3 (3)0·058
Atrial dysrhythmia20 (10·1)10 (9·3)10 (11)0·686
Deep venous thrombosis3 (1·5)3 (2·8)0 (0)0·252
Pulmonary embolism5 (2·5)2 (1·9)3 (3)0·662
Wound infection10 (5·0)10 (9·3)0 (0)0·003
Vocal cord nerve injury5 (2·5)3 (2·8)2 (2)0·795
Chyle leak17 (8·5)10 (9·3)7 (8)0·694
Reoperation3 (1·5)2 (1·9)1 (1)1·000
Mortality
30‐day2 (1·0)1 (0·9)1 (1)1·000
90‐day3 (1·5)2 (1·9)1 (1)1·000

Values in parentheses are percentages. SMI, skeletal muscle index; CD, Clavien–Dindo grade.

χ2 or Fisher's exact test.

Overview of postoperative complications and mortality Values in parentheses are percentages. SMI, skeletal muscle index; CD, Clavien–Dindo grade. χ2 or Fisher's exact test.

Analysis of changes in skeletal muscle index and total postoperative complications

Univariable analysis revealed that a decrease in the SMI greater than 5 per cent during NAT was not associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications (OR 0·91, 95 per cent c.i. 0·52 to 1·59; P = 0·736) (Table  ). Neither did the 10 per cent of patients with the greatest decrease in SMI during NAT show a higher risk of total postoperative complications (OR 0·99, 0·39 to 2·46; P = 0·962). Sarcopenia before the start of NAT (OR 1·03, 0·59 to 1·81; P = 0·916) or surgery (OR 1·02, 0·58 to 1·77; P = 0·958) did not have significant prognostic value for total complications. Multiple regression analysis did not show a predictive value for an SMI decrease greater than 5 per cent (OR 0·81, 0·45 to 1·46; P = 0·484) (Table  ). The complete results of the univariable and multiple regression analyses can be seen in Table  (supporting information).
Table 4

Univariable and multiple regression analysis of changes in skeletal muscle index and postoperative complications

Univariable analysisMultiple regression analysis
Odds ratioPOdds ratioP
Total postoperative complications *
SMI change > 5%0·91 (0·52, 1·59)0·7360·81 (0·45, 1·46)0·484
10% of patients with greatest SMI decrease0·99 (0·39, 2·46)0·962
Sarcopenia
Before NAT1·03 (0·59, 1·81)0·916
Before surgery1·02 (0·58, 1·77)0·958
Severe postoperative complications
SMI change >5%0·66 (0·29, 1·53)0·3290·58 (0·24, 1·39)0·222
10% of patients with greatest SMI decrease0·31 (0·04, 2·43)0·241
Sarcopenia
Before NAT0·93 (0·41, 2·13)0·868
Before surgery0·89 (0·40, 2·01)0·786

Values in parentheses are 95 per cent confidence intervals.

Clavien–Dindo grade I–V;

Clavien–Dindo grade IIIa and above. SMI, skeletal muscle index; NAT, neoadjuvant therapy.

Univariable and multiple regression analysis of changes in skeletal muscle index and postoperative complications Values in parentheses are 95 per cent confidence intervals. Clavien–Dindo grade I–V; Clavien–Dindo grade IIIa and above. SMI, skeletal muscle index; NAT, neoadjuvant therapy.

Analysis of changes in skeletal muscle index and severe postoperative complications

Patients with a SMI decrease greater than 5 per cent during NAT did not have an increased risk of developing severe postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo grade IIIa and above) (OR 0·66, 95 per cent c.i. 0·29 to 1·53; P = 0·329) (Table  ). Similarly, the 10 per cent of the patients with the greatest SMI decrease during NAT did not show a significantly higher risk of severe complications. Neither sarcopenia before the start of NAT (OR 0·93, 0·41 to 2·13; P = 0·868), nor sarcopenia before surgery (OR 0·89, 0·40 to 2·01; P = 0·786) had a significant prognostic value. Accounting for other clinical variables, multiple regression analysis also failed to demonstrate that SMI changes predicted postoperative outcomes (Table  , supporting information).

Analysis of changes in skeletal muscle index and three specific postoperative complications

Univariable and multiple regression analyses were performed for three specific postoperative complications: pneumonia, anastomotic leak and atrial fibrillation (Tables  – , supporting information). A decrease of more than 5 per cent in SMI during NAT was not predictive for any of these complications (pneumonia: OR 0·78, 95 per cent c.i. 0·40 to 1·51, P = 0·455; anastomotic leak: OR 0·14, 0·02 to 1·23, P = 0·076; atrial fibrillation: OR 1·03, 0·39 to 2·75, P = 0·953).

Discussion

The use of NAT was associated with a significant decrease in SMI. Patients with the greatest reduction in SMI were not at increased risk of postoperative complications. Sarcopenia either before NAT or surgery did not predict postoperative complications. No association was found for specific complications including pneumonia, anastomotic leak and atrial fibrillation. The decrease in SMI in the present study was comparable to that found in previous studies , , . Others have demonstrated a significant predictive value of muscle mass depletion during NAT for overall survival. One study showed a significant predictive value of skeletal muscle area loss (above 6 per cent) in palliative foregut cancer for overall survival, whereas another demonstrated that loss of skeletal muscle mass during NAT had prognostic value for overall survival, although without significant differences in postoperative complications between the groups with the highest and lowest degree of muscle mass loss. Although muscle mass loss during NAT seems to have a negative impact on overall survival, it does not appear to predict postoperative complications. Dysphagia and weight loss are the most common symptoms of gastro‐oesophageal cancer . This is reflected in the relatively high prevalence of sarcopenia in the present study population (54·3 per cent) compared with other abdominal malignancies . Multiple factors may be responsible for muscle mass depletion during NAT: immobility, feeding problems, loss of appetite, and effects from cancer‐related cytokines . In gastro‐oesophageal cancer it is possible that sarcopenia is predominantly an effect of dysphagia and inadequate nutrition, whereas in other cancers it might be related predominantly to cancer burden or paraneoplastic effects. Different mechanisms for the development of sarcopenia might influence specific outcomes, such as surgical complication rates. Loss of skeletal muscle is not the only indicator of functional depletion . Physical tests such as handgrip strength or walking speed are combined with muscle mass to diagnose sarcopenia according to the current consensus of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia and Older People . In the present study, no data on physical performance during NAT were available. The combined measurement of muscle mass and muscle function may be a better predictor of short‐term surgical outcomes. Both complications after surgery and postoperative loss of skeletal muscle mass are associated with impaired survival in oesophageal cancer . Although the present study showed that a significant decrease in skeletal muscle mass occurred during NAT in patients with gastro‐oesophageal cancer before surgery, this change was not associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications. Sarcopenia related to the effects of the primary tumour and NAT is not a likely explanation for the effect of postoperative complications on long‐term survival. Table S1 Body composition changes during neoadjuvant therapy in 41 women and 158 men Table S2 Univariable and multiple regression analysis of changes in skeletal muscle index and total (Clavien–Dindo grade I–V) and severe (Clavien–Dindo grade IIIa and above) postoperative complications Table S3 Univariable and multiple regression analysis of changes in skeletal muscle index and pneumonia Table S4 Univariable and multiple regression analysis of changes in skeletal muscle index and anastomotic leak Table S5 Univariable and multiple regression analysis of changes in skeletal muscle index and atrial fibrillation Click here for additional data file.
  21 in total

Review 1.  The diagnosis and management of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Sri G Thrumurthy; M Asif Chaudry; Daniel Hochhauser; Muntzer Mughal
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-11-04

Review 2.  Sarcopenia.

Authors:  Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Avan A Sayer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Benchmarking Complications Associated with Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Donald E Low; Madhan Kumar Kuppusamy; Derek Alderson; Ivan Cecconello; Andrew C Chang; Gail Darling; Andrew Davies; Xavier Benoit D'Journo; Suzanne S Gisbertz; S Michael Griffin; Richard Hardwick; Arnulf Hoelscher; Wayne Hofstetter; Blair Jobe; Yuko Kitagawa; Simon Law; Christophe Mariette; Nick Maynard; Christopher R Morse; Philippe Nafteux; Manuel Pera; C S Pramesh; Sonia Puig; John V Reynolds; Wolfgang Schroeder; Mark Smithers; B P L Wijnhoven
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Cancer-associated malnutrition, cachexia and sarcopenia: the skeleton in the hospital closet 40 years later.

Authors:  Aoife M Ryan; Derek G Power; Louise Daly; Samantha J Cushen; Ēadaoin Ní Bhuachalla; Carla M Prado
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 6.297

5.  Marked changes in body composition following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for oesophagogastric cancer.

Authors:  Sherif Awad; Benjamin H Tan; Helen Cui; Ashish Bhalla; Kenneth C H Fearon; Simon L Parsons; James A Catton; Dileep N Lobo
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 7.324

6.  Body weight and composition changes in ovarian cancer patients during adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Karen M Gil; Heidi E Frasure; Michael P Hopkins; Eric L Jenison; Vivian E von Gruenigen
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Prevalence, risk factors and clinical implications of malnutrition in French Comprehensive Cancer Centres.

Authors:  M Pressoir; S Desné; D Berchery; G Rossignol; B Poiree; M Meslier; S Traversier; M Vittot; M Simon; J P Gekiere; J Meuric; F Serot; M N Falewee; I Rodrigues; P Senesse; M P Vasson; F Chelle; B Maget; S Antoun; P Bachmann
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Loss of skeletal muscle during systemic chemotherapy is prognostic of poor survival in patients with foregut cancer.

Authors:  Louise E Daly; Éadaoin B Ní Bhuachalla; Derek G Power; Samantha J Cushen; Karl James; Aoife M Ryan
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 12.910

10.  CoreSlicer: a web toolkit for analytic morphomics.

Authors:  Louis Mullie; Jonathan Afilalo
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 1.930

View more
  4 in total

1.  Skeletal Muscle Change During Neoadjuvant Therapy and Its Impact on Prognosis in Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xin-Yi Xu; Xiao-Man Jiang; Qin Xu; Hao Xu; Jin-Hua Luo; Cui Yao; Ling-Yu Ding; Shu-Qin Zhu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  Influence of body composition measures on chyle leak after oesophagectomy.

Authors:  James M Halle-Smith; Manjunath Siddaiah-Subramanya; Abdulrahman Ghoneim; Ahmed Almonib; Benjamin H L Tan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Body Composition Is a Predictor for Postoperative Complications After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Prospective Side Study of the LOGICA Trial.

Authors:  Thaís T T Tweed; Arjen van der Veen; Stan Tummers; David P J van Dijk; Misha D P Luyer; Jelle P Ruurda; Richard van Hillegersberg; Jan H M B Stoot; Juul J W Tegels; Karel W E Hulsewe; Hylke J F Brenkman; Maarten F J Seesing; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Jeroen E H Ponten; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Sjoerd M Lagarde; Wobbe O de Steur; Henk H Hartgrink; Ewout A Kouwenhoven; Marc J van Det; Eelco B Wassenaar; Edwin S van der Zaag; Werner A Draaisma; Ivo A M J Broeders; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Body Composition Changes in Gastric Cancer Patients during Preoperative FLOT Therapy: Preliminary Results of an Italian Cohort Study.

Authors:  Emanuele Rinninella; Antonia Strippoli; Marco Cintoni; Pauline Raoul; Raffaella Vivolo; Mariantonietta Di Salvatore; Enza Genco; Riccardo Manfredi; Emilio Bria; Giampaolo Tortora; Antonio Gasbarrini; Carmelo Pozzo; Maria Cristina Mele
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 5.717

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.