Julie Demaret1,2, Pauline Varlet1,2, Jacques Trauet1,2, David Beauvais2,3, Aurélien Grossemy1,2, Florent Hégo4, Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha2,3, Myriam Labalette1,2. 1. CHU Lille, Institut d'Immunologie, Lille, France. 2. Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1286-Infinite-Institute for Translational Research in Inflammation, Lille, France. 3. Department of Hematology, CHU Lille, Allogenic Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Lille, France. 4. Department of Medical Oncology, Center Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is considered as a major scientific breakthrough in cancer immunotherapy. The success of adoptive CAR T-cell therapy for cancer has inspired researchers to expand indications into the area of solid tumors, autoimmune and infectious diseases. The most important factors influencing outcome and durability of the response after infusion of CAR T-cell are proliferation and persistence of this cell subset. It becomes therefore important to detect easily and monitor circulating CAR T-cells into blood samples. Approaches such as quantitative PCR (qPCR) or flow cytometry have been developed. The aim of this study was to set up and optimize a reachable flow cytometry technique using labeled CD19 protein for the measurement of CAR T-cells in infusion bag and patient's blood. METHODS: Patients receiving Yescarta in Cell Therapy Unit (Department of hematology, Lille university hospital, France) between April and October 2019 and healthy volunteers were included to set up the flow cytometry technique. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We assessed feasibility in clinic and suitability to routine workload of a flow cytometry technique to follow CAR T-cells in infusion bag and patient's blood. With only a few manual steps, the present protocol allows the technician to perform this technique among other routine tasks, meaning a time to results of <2 hr after sample reception. We were also able to assess CAR T-cell heterogenity in terms of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes within the subset. Moreover, this technique allows monitoring of both authority approved CD19 CAR T-cell.
BACKGROUND: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is considered as a major scientific breakthrough in cancer immunotherapy. The success of adoptive CAR T-cell therapy for cancer has inspired researchers to expand indications into the area of solid tumors, autoimmune and infectious diseases. The most important factors influencing outcome and durability of the response after infusion of CAR T-cell are proliferation and persistence of this cell subset. It becomes therefore important to detect easily and monitor circulating CAR T-cells into blood samples. Approaches such as quantitative PCR (qPCR) or flow cytometry have been developed. The aim of this study was to set up and optimize a reachable flow cytometry technique using labeled CD19 protein for the measurement of CAR T-cells in infusion bag and patient's blood. METHODS: Patients receiving Yescarta in Cell Therapy Unit (Department of hematology, Lille university hospital, France) between April and October 2019 and healthy volunteers were included to set up the flow cytometry technique. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We assessed feasibility in clinic and suitability to routine workload of a flow cytometry technique to follow CAR T-cells in infusion bag and patient's blood. With only a few manual steps, the present protocol allows the technician to perform this technique among other routine tasks, meaning a time to results of <2 hr after sample reception. We were also able to assess CAR T-cell heterogenity in terms of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes within the subset. Moreover, this technique allows monitoring of both authority approved CD19 CAR T-cell.
Authors: Yifei Hu; Guoshuai Cao; Xiufen Chen; Xiaodan Huang; Nicholas Asby; Nicholas Ankenbruck; Ali Rahman; Ashima Thusu; Yanran He; Peter A Riedell; Michael R Bishop; Hans Schreiber; Justin P Kline; Jun Huang Journal: Matter Date: 2021-11-10
Authors: Elisabeth Laurent; Anna Sieber; Benjamin Salzer; Anna Wachernig; Jacqueline Seigner; Manfred Lehner; René Geyeregger; Bernhard Kratzer; Ulrich Jäger; Renate Kunert; Winfried F Pickl; Michael W Traxlmayr Journal: ACS Synth Biol Date: 2021-04-12 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: Andreas Peinelt; Melanie Bremm; Hermann Kreyenberg; Claudia Cappel; Julia Banisharif-Dehkordi; Stephanie Erben; Eva Rettinger; Andrea Jarisch; Roland Meisel; Paul-Gerhardt Schlegel; Olaf Beck; Gesine Bug; Jan-Henning Klusmann; Thomas Klingebiel; Sabine Huenecke; Peter Bader Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Maria-Luisa Schubert; Carolina Berger; Alexander Kunz; Anita Schmitt; Anita Badbaran; Brigitte Neuber; Silke Zeschke; Lei Wang; Kristoffer Riecken; Angela Hückelhoven-Krauss; Ingo Müller; Carsten Müller-Tidow; Peter Dreger; Nicolaus Kröger; Francis A Ayuk; Michael Schmitt; Boris Fehse Journal: Int J Oncol Date: 2022-03-16 Impact factor: 5.650
Authors: Soragia Athina Gkazi; Emma Gravett; Carla Bautista; Jack Bartram; Sara Ghorashian; Stuart Paul Adams Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-07-08 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Yihua Cai; Michaela Prochazkova; Chunjie Jiang; Hannah W Song; Jianjian Jin; Larry Moses; Nikolaos Gkitsas; Robert P Somerville; Steven L Highfill; Sandhya Panch; David F Stroncek; Ping Jin Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2021-12-24 Impact factor: 5.531