Literature DB >> 32841483

Fundamental research questions in subterranean biology.

Stefano Mammola1,2, Isabel R Amorim3, Maria E Bichuette4, Paulo A V Borges3, Naowarat Cheeptham5, Steven J B Cooper6,7, David C Culver8, Louis Deharveng9, David Eme10, Rodrigo Lopes Ferreira11, Cene Fišer12, Žiga Fišer12, Daniel W Fong13, Christian Griebler14, William R Jeffery15, Jure Jugovic16, Johanna E Kowalko17, Thomas M Lilley18, Florian Malard19, Raoul Manenti20, Alejandro Martínez2, Melissa B Meierhofer18,21, Matthew L Niemiller22, Diana E Northup23, Thais G Pellegrini11, Tanja Pipan24,25, Meredith Protas26, Ana Sofia P S Reboleira27, Michael P Venarsky28, J Judson Wynne29, Maja Zagmajster12, Pedro Cardoso1.   

Abstract

Five decades ago, a landmark paper in Science titled The Cave Environment heralded caves as ideal natural experimental laboratories in which to develop and address general questions in geology, ecology, biogeography, and evolutionary biology. Although the 'caves as laboratory' paradigm has since been advocated by subterranean biologists, there are few examples of studies that successfully translated their results into general principles. The contemporary era of big data, modelling tools, and revolutionary advances in genetics and (meta)genomics provides an opportunity to revisit unresolved questions and challenges, as well as examine promising new avenues of research in subterranean biology. Accordingly, we have developed a roadmap to guide future research endeavours in subterranean biology by adapting a well-established methodology of 'horizon scanning' to identify the highest priority research questions across six subject areas. Based on the expert opinion of 30 scientists from around the globe with complementary expertise and of different academic ages, we assembled an initial list of 258 fundamental questions concentrating on macroecology and microbial ecology, adaptation, evolution, and conservation. Subsequently, through online surveys, 130 subterranean biologists with various backgrounds assisted us in reducing our list to 50 top-priority questions. These research questions are broad in scope and ready to be addressed in the next decade. We believe this exercise will stimulate research towards a deeper understanding of subterranean biology and foster hypothesis-driven studies likely to resonate broadly from the traditional boundaries of this field.
© 2020 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Keywords:  biospeleology; cave biology; expert opinion; groundwater; horizon scanning; research questions; stygofauna; troglobionts

Year:  2020        PMID: 32841483     DOI: 10.1111/brv.12642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  8 in total

1.  A trait database and updated checklist for European subterranean spiders.

Authors:  Stefano Mammola; Martina Pavlek; Bernhard A Huber; Marco Isaia; Francesco Ballarin; Marco Tolve; Iva Čupić; Thomas Hesselberg; Enrico Lunghi; Samuel Mouron; Caio Graco-Roza; Pedro Cardoso
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 8.501

2.  Specialized terminology reduces the number of citations of scientific papers.

Authors:  Alejandro Martínez; Stefano Mammola
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Cave-adapted beetles from continental Portugal.

Authors:  Ana Sofia P S Reboleira; Rita P Eusébio
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2021-08-20

4.  The critical thermal maximum of diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae): a comparison of subterranean and surface-dwelling species.

Authors:  Karl K Jones; William F Humphreys; Mattia Saccò; Terry Bertozzi; Andy D Austin; Steven J B Cooper
Journal:  Curr Res Insect Sci       Date:  2021-09-16

5.  Differential transcriptomic responses to heat stress in surface and subterranean diving beetles.

Authors:  Perry G Beasley-Hall; Terry Bertozzi; Tessa M Bradford; Charles S P Foster; Karl Jones; Simon M Tierney; William F Humphreys; Andrew D Austin; Steven J B Cooper
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Towards evidence-based conservation of subterranean ecosystems.

Authors:  Stefano Mammola; Melissa B Meierhofer; Paulo A V Borges; Raquel Colado; David C Culver; Louis Deharveng; Teo Delić; Tiziana Di Lorenzo; Tvrtko Dražina; Rodrigo L Ferreira; Barbara Fiasca; Cene Fišer; Diana M P Galassi; Laura Garzoli; Vasilis Gerovasileiou; Christian Griebler; Stuart Halse; Francis G Howarth; Marco Isaia; Joseph S Johnson; Ana Komerički; Alejandro Martínez; Filippo Milano; Oana T Moldovan; Veronica Nanni; Giuseppe Nicolosi; Matthew L Niemiller; Susana Pallarés; Martina Pavlek; Elena Piano; Tanja Pipan; David Sanchez-Fernandez; Andrea Santangeli; Susanne I Schmidt; J Judson Wynne; Maja Zagmajster; Valerija Zakšek; Pedro Cardoso
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2022-03-21

Review 7.  Microbial roles in cave biogeochemical cycling.

Authors:  Hai-Zhen Zhu; Cheng-Ying Jiang; Shuang-Jiang Liu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 6.064

Review 8.  Collecting eco-evolutionary data in the dark: Impediments to subterranean research and how to overcome them.

Authors:  Stefano Mammola; Enrico Lunghi; Helena Bilandžija; Pedro Cardoso; Volker Grimm; Susanne I Schmidt; Thomas Hesselberg; Alejandro Martínez
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.