Literature DB >> 32841384

Complex assessment of relationship quality within dyads.

Maija Reblin1, Allison A Vaughn2, Wendy C Birmingham3, Timothy W Smith4, Bert N Uchino4, Chandler M Spahr2.   

Abstract

Higher quality relationships have been linked to improved outcomes; however, the measurement of relationship quality often ignores its complexity and the possibility of co-occurring positivity and negativity across different contexts. The goal of this study is to test the added benefit of including multiple dimensions, contexts, and perspectives of relationship quality from both individuals in predicting marital functioning. The Social Relationships Index assessed positive and negative dimensions of relationship quality under neutral, positive, and support-seeking contexts for 183 heterosexual married couples. Models showed that the inclusion of multiple dimensions of relationship quality across all three contexts improved prediction of marital functioning for both women and men. The use of multidimensional multicontextual relationship quality assessments is highly recommended.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32841384      PMCID: PMC7450490          DOI: 10.1002/jcop.22392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Psychol        ISSN: 0090-4392


  27 in total

1.  Ambivalent versus problematic social ties: implications for psychological health, functional health, and interpersonal coping.

Authors:  Karen S Rook; Gloria Luong; Dara H Sorkin; Jason T Newsom; Neal Krause
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-07-09

2.  The increased construct validity and clinical utility of assessing relationship quality using separate positive and negative dimensions.

Authors:  Richard E Mattson; Dawnelle Paldino; Matthew D Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2007-03

3.  Testing the ruler with item response theory: increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index.

Authors:  Janette L Funk; Ronald D Rogge
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2007-12

4.  Conflict and love: predicting newlywed marital outcomes from two interaction contexts.

Authors:  Elana C Graber; Jean-Philippe Laurenceau; Erin Miga; Joanna Chango; James Coan
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2011-08

5.  Longitudinal Associations Between Husbands' and Wives' Depressive Symptoms.

Authors:  Chrystyna D Kouros; E Mark Cummings
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2010-02

Review 6.  Attachment, conflict and relationship quality: laboratory-based and clinical insights.

Authors:  Judith Feeney; Jennifer Fitzgerald
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-04-14

7.  Methodological errors in marital and child treatment research.

Authors:  K D O'Leary; H Turkewitz
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1978-08

8.  Social relationships and health: is feeling positive, negative, or both (ambivalent) about your social ties related to telomeres?

Authors:  Bert N Uchino; Richard M Cawthon; Timothy W Smith; Kathleen C Light; Justin McKenzie; McKenzie Carlisle; Heather Gunn; Wendy Birmingham; Kimberly Bowen
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 4.267

9.  Social ties and cardiovascular function: an examination of relationship positivity and negativity during stress.

Authors:  Wendy Birmingham; Bert N Uchino; Timothy W Smith; Kathy C Light; David M Sanbonmatsu
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 10.  Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Julianne Holt-Lunstad; Timothy B Smith; J Bradley Layton
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.