Literature DB >> 32841339

Guideline-based indicators for adult patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Kristina Stojkov1,2, Tobias Silzle3, Georg Stussi4, David Schwappach5,6, Juerg Bernhard7, David Bowen8, Jaroslav Čermák9, Avinash G Dinmohamed10,11,12, Corien Eeltink12, Sabrina Eggmann13, Pierre Fenaux14, Ulrich Germing15, Manuel Haschke16,17, Eva Hellstrom-Lindberg18, Monika Heger1,7, Arjan A van de Loosdrecht12, Jakob Passweg19, Michael Pfeilstöcker20, Uwe Platzbecker21,22, Luca Malcovati23,24, António Medina de Almeida25, Moshe Mittelman26, Christine Morgenthaler1,7, David P Steensma27, Valeria Santini28,29, Reinhard Stauder30, Argiris Symeonidis31, Sämi Schär32, Charlotte Maddox32, Theo de Witte33, Julia Bohlius6, Nicolas Bonadies1,2.   

Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) represent a heterogeneous group of hematological stem cell disorders with an increasing burden on health care systems. Evidence-based MDS guidelines and recommendations (G/Rs) are published but do not necessarily translate into better quality of care if adherence is not maintained in daily clinical practice. Guideline-based indicators (GBIs) are measurable elements for the standardized assessment of quality of care and, thus far, have not been developed for adult MDS patients. To this end, we screened relevant G/Rs published between 1999 and 2018 and aggregated all available information as candidate GBIs into a formalized handbook as the basis for the subsequent consensus rating procedure. An international multidisciplinary expert panel group (EPG) of acknowledged MDS experts (n = 17), health professionals (n = 7), and patient advocates (n = 5) was appointed. The EPG feedback rates for the first and second round were 82% (23 of 28) and 96% (26 of 27), respectively. A final set of 29 GBIs for the 3 domains of diagnosis (n = 14), therapy (n = 8), and provider/infrastructural characteristics (n = 7) achieved the predefined agreement score for selection (>70%). We identified shortcomings in standardization of patient-reported outcomes, toxicity, and geriatric assessments that need to be optimized in the future. Our GBIs represent the first comprehensive consensus on measurable elements addressing best practice performance, outcomes, and structural resources. They can be used as a standardized instrument with the goal of assessing, comparing, and fostering good quality of care within clinical development cycles in the daily care of adult MDS patients.
© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32841339      PMCID: PMC7448599          DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Adv        ISSN: 2473-9529


  47 in total

Review 1.  Clinical guidelines: developing guidelines.

Authors:  P G Shekelle; S H Woolf; M Eccles; J Grimshaw
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-02-27

2.  What is value in health care?

Authors:  Michael E Porter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Influence of patient and provider characteristics on quality of care for the myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Gregory A Abel; Angel M Cronin; Oreofe O Odejide; Hajime Uno; Richard M Stone; David P Steensma
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 6.998

4.  Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group.

Authors:  L A Bero; R Grilli; J M Grimshaw; E Harvey; A D Oxman; M A Thomson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-15

Review 5.  Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for MDS and CMML: recommendations from an international expert panel.

Authors:  Theo de Witte; David Bowen; Marie Robin; Luca Malcovati; Dietger Niederwieser; Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha; Ghulam J Mufti; Pierre Fenaux; Guillermo Sanz; Rodrigo Martino; Emilio Paolo Alessandrino; Francesco Onida; Argiris Symeonidis; Jakob Passweg; Guido Kobbe; Arnold Ganser; Uwe Platzbecker; Jürgen Finke; Michel van Gelder; Arjan A van de Loosdrecht; Per Ljungman; Reinhard Stauder; Liisa Volin; H Joachim Deeg; Corey Cutler; Wael Saber; Richard Champlin; Sergio Giralt; Claudio Anasetti; Nicolaus Kröger
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Somatic mutations predict poor outcome in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation.

Authors:  Rafael Bejar; Kristen E Stevenson; Bennett Caughey; R Coleman Lindsley; Brenton G Mar; Petar Stojanov; Gad Getz; David P Steensma; Jerome Ritz; Robert Soiffer; Joseph H Antin; Edwin Alyea; Philippe Armand; Vincent Ho; John Koreth; Donna Neuberg; Corey S Cutler; Benjamin L Ebert
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Quality-of-care indicators for early-stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin A Spencer; Michael Steinberg; Jennifer Malin; John Adams; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  The impact of age on the diagnosis and therapy of myelodysplastic syndromes: results from a retrospective multicenter analysis in Germany.

Authors:  Norbert Gattermann; Andrea Kündgen; Lenka Kellermann; Matti Zeffel; Bernadette Paessens; Ulrich Germing
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  Using the Delphi technique to improve clinical outcomes through the development of quality indicators in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Lori Wood; Georg A Bjarnason; Peter C Black; Ilias Cagiannos; Daniel Yick Chin Heng; Anil Kapoor; Christian K Kollmannsberger; Forough Mohammadzadeh; Ronald B Moore; Ricardo A Rendon; Denis Soulieres; Simon Tanguay; Peter Venner; Michael Jewett; Antonio Finelli
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 10.  Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rym Boulkedid; Hendy Abdoul; Marine Loustau; Olivier Sibony; Corinne Alberti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Core set of patient-reported outcomes for myelodysplastic syndromes: an EUMDS Delphi study involving patients and hematologists.

Authors:  Igor Stojkov; Annette Conrads-Frank; Ursula Rochau; Karin A Koinig; Marjan Arvandi; Sibylle Puntscher; Corine van Marrewijk; Pierre Fenaux; Argiris Symeonidis; Fatiha Chermat; Hege Garelius; David Bowen; Moshe Mittelman; Elvira Mora; Theo de Witte; Fabio Efficace; Uwe Siebert; Reinhard Stauder
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2022-01-11

Review 2.  Patient-Physician Communication in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome.

Authors:  Emanuela Morelli; Olga Mulas; Giovanni Caocci
Journal:  Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health       Date:  2021-12-31

3.  Management of infection prophylaxis in Dutch patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, a web-based case vignette questionnaire: The MINDSET study.

Authors:  Johanne Rozema; Eric van Roon; Lars Vogelzang; Robby Kibbelaar; Nic Veeger; Arjan van de Loosdrecht; Mels Hoogendoorn
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.674

Review 4.  When Should We Think of Myelodysplasia or Bone Marrow Failure in a Thrombocytopenic Patient? A Practical Approach to Diagnosis.

Authors:  Nicolas Bonadies; Alicia Rovó; Naomi Porret; Ulrike Bacher
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.