Literature DB >> 32840882

Long-term Quality of Life After Treatment of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Pihla Ranta1, Ilpo Kinnunen1, Lauri Jouhi2, Tero Vahlberg3, Leif J J Back2, Elina Halme4, Petri Koivunen5, Timo Autio5, Matti Pukkila6, Heikki Irjala1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the long-term quality of life (QOL) among oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) survivors. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective chart analysis and patient response to European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30), Head and Neck Module (EORTC QLQ-H&N35), and M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) survey questionnaires.
METHODS: All survivors of OPSCC diagnosed and treated between 2000 and 2009 in Finland were included. There were 263 survivors (44.2% of all curatively treated patients), of which a total of 164 participated in this study (62.4%). Median follow-up was 11.79 years (range = 8.59-18.53 years, interquartile range [IQR] = 4.64 years). The mean age of the participants was 67.9 years (standard deviation = 8.0 years) at QOL follow-up.
RESULTS: Most survivors reported a good QOL. The EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status median was 75.00 (IQR = 31.25). The single modality treatment group had significantly better QOL outcomes than the combined treatment group. Nonsmokers and previous smokers had significantly better QOL outcomes than patients who smoked at the time of diagnosis. A history of heavy alcohol use resulted in significantly worse QOL outcomes. The p16-positive cancer patients had significantly better QOL outcomes than p16-negative patients. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube-dependent patients reported a significantly worse QOL than patients without a PEG tube.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term QOL in OPSCC survivors is generally good. In line with previous literature, single modality treatment was superior to combined treatment in long-term QOL outcomes, and it should be pursued whenever possible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E1172-E1178, 2021.
© 2020 American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society Inc, "The Triological Society" and American Laryngological Association (ALA).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oropharyngeal carcinoma; head and neck cancer; quality of life; treatment effect

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32840882     DOI: 10.1002/lary.29042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of Objective Measures of Trismus and Salivation With Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Sallie M Long; Annu Singh; Amy L Tin; Bridget O'Hara; Marc A Cohen; Nancy Lee; David G Pfister; Tony Hung; Richard J Wong; Andrew J Vickers; Cherry L Estilo; Jennifer R Cracchiolo
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 8.961

2.  Dysphagia, hypothyroidism, and osteoradionecrosis after radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Pihla Ranta; Eero Kytö; Linda Nissi; Ilpo Kinnunen; Tero Vahlberg; Heikki Minn; Eeva Haapio; Lassi Nelimarkka; Heikki Irjala
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-12-10

Review 3.  The changing face of head and neck cancer: are patients with human papillomavirus-positive disease at greater nutritional risk? A systematic review.

Authors:  Anna Edwards; Teresa Brown; Brett G M Hughes; Judy Bauer
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.359

4.  Quality-of-Life Assessment after Head and Neck Oncological Surgery for Advanced-Stage Tumours.

Authors:  Paula Luiza Bejenaru; Bogdan Popescu; Alina Lavinia Antoaneta Oancea; Catrinel Beatrice Simion-Antonie; Gloria Simona Berteșteanu; Mihnea Condeescu-Cojocarița; Anca Ionela Cîrstea; Irina Doinița Oașă; Teodora Elena Schipor-Diaconu; Dan Popescu; Raluca Grigore
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.964

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.