| Literature DB >> 32840228 |
Yoo Li Lim1, Young Woo Eom2,3, Su Jung Park3,4, Taeui Hong3,4, Seong Hee Kang1,3,4, Soon Koo Baik1,3,4, Kyu-Sang Park4,5, Moon Young Kim1,3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Autologous or allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) have been applied in clinical trials to treat liver disease. However, only a few studies are comparing the characteristics of autologous MSCs from patients and allogeneic MSCs from normal subjects. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Cirrhosis; Differentiation; Mesenchymal stem cells; Mitochondria; Proliferation; Senescence
Year: 2020 PMID: 32840228 PMCID: PMC7691862 DOI: 10.15283/ijsc20072
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Stem Cells ISSN: 2005-3606 Impact factor: 2.500
Primers used for studies
| Genes | Forward sequence (5’⟶3’) | Reverse sequence (5’⟶3’) |
|---|---|---|
| CAT | TGGGATCTCGTTGGAAATAACAC | TCAGGACGTAGGCTCCAGAAG |
| C/EBP | TGTATACCCCTGGTGGGAGA | TCATAACTCCGGTCCCTCTG |
| GPX1 | TATCGAGAATGTGGCGTCCC | TCTTGGCGTTCTCCTGATGC |
| Leptin | GGCTTTGGCCCTATCTTTTC | ACCGGTGACTTTCTGTTTGG |
| MnSOD | TGGTGGTCATATCAATCATAGC | ATTTGTAAGTGTCCCCGTTC |
| MT-CO1 | AGCCTCCGTAGACCTAACCA | CGAAGAGGGGCGTTTGGTAT |
| Nanog | ACCTATGCCTGTGATTTGTGG | AGTGGGTTGTTTGCCTTTGG |
| OCT4 | ACATCAAAGCTCTGCAGAAAGAACT | CTGAATACCTTCCCAAATAGAACCC |
| PPAR | AGCCTCATGAAGAGCCTTCCAAC | TCTCCGGAAGAAACCCTTGCATC |
| PPIA | TCCTGGCATCTTGTCCAT | TGCTGGTCTTGCCATTCCT |
| SDHB | GCTACTGGTGGAACGGAGAC | GCGCTCCTCTGTGAAGTCAT |
| Sox2 | GGGAAATGGGAGGGGTGCAAAAGAGG | TTGCGTGAGTGTGGATGGGATTGGTG |
| Tfam | AGCTCAGAACCCAGATGCAA | CCGCCCTATAAGCATCTTGA |
Fig. 1Positive cell surface markers of BCs and BPs. Positive cell surface markers (CD73, CD90, and CD105) in passage 3 of BCs and BPs were analyzed by flow cytometry, and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was compared in BCs and BPs. (A) Positive expression of BMSC markers. (B) MFI of positive cell surface mar-kers. All data are shown as the mean± SE, n=6.
Fig. 2Proliferation potentials of BCs and BPs. (A) Representative PDT changes in BC2 and BP1 during serial passages. (B) Mean PDT of P3, P4, and P5. *p<0.05 (n=6). (C) Cumu-lative cell number, (D∼F) Expression of transcription factors (Nanog, OCT4, Sox2) regulating proliferation. Expre-ssion level was evaluated by qPCR. n=6. (G) Colony forming unit–fibroblast (CFU-F) in normal and cirrhotic SD rat. The CFU-F units counted using a microscope. *p<0.05 (n=5). We defined a CFU-F unit as a colony consisting of more than 100 cells. All data are shown as the mean±SE.
Fig. 3Cellular senescence of BCs and BPs. BCs and BPs of passage 3 were used to detect the cellular senescence and expression of its markers, p21 and p53. (A) SA-β-gal activity in P3 of BCs and BPs. SA-β-gal-positive cells were photographed (100× magnification) with a phase - contrast microscope and enumerated. At least 200 cells were counted from six different fields, and the percentage of positive cells is shown. *p< 0.05 (n=6). (B) Expression of senescence regulators, p21 and p53. All data are shown as the mean±SE (n=6).
Fig. 4Adipogenic differentiation potentials of BCs and BPs. BCs and BPs at passage 3 were differentiated into adipocytes and stained with Oil Red O stain. *p<0.05. Adipogenesis was also evaluated by qPCR to detect adipogenic markers, Leptin, PPARγ, and C/EBPα. (A) Oil Red O staining. (B) qPCR for Leptin, PPARγ, and C/EBPα. All data are shown as the mean±SE (n=6). Adipo.: adipogene-sis.
Fig. 5Parameters for mitochondrial activities of BCs and BPs. To analyze parameters for mitochondrial activities, BCs and BPs at passage 3 were used. (A) Mitochondrial DNA (mtD NA) copy number. (B) Mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), **p< 0.01 and ***p<0.001. (C) ATP ge-neration. (D∼F) Mitochondrial biogenesis related-gene expression. (G) OCR of BCs. (H) OCR of BPs. (I) Relative OCR in BCs and BPs. (J∼L) ROS-regulating gene expression. (M) ROS generation. **p<0.01. All data are shown as the mean±SE (n=6).