Noelle E Carlozzi1, Nicholas R Boileau2, Angela Roberts3, Praveen Dayalu4, Dana L Hanifan5, Jennifer A Miner2, Daniel Claassen6, Emily Mower Provost7. 1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building NCRC B14, Room G216, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2800, USA. carlozzi@med.umich.edu. 2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building NCRC B14, Room G216, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2800, USA. 3. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. 4. Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 5. Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 6. Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. 7. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: As Huntington disease (HD) progresses, speech and swallowing difficulties become more profound. These difficulties have an adverse effect on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), thus psychometrically robust measures of speech and swallowing are needed to better understand the impact of these domains across the course of the disease. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to establish the clinical utility of two new patient-reported outcome measures (PROs), HDQLIFE Speech Difficulties and HDQLIFE Swallowing Difficulties. METHODS: Thirty-one participants with premanifest or manifest HD, and 31 age- and sex-matched healthy control participants were recruited for this study. Participants completed several PROs [HDQLIFE Speech Difficulties, HDQLIFE Swallowing Difficulties, Communication Participation Item Bank (CPIB)], as well as several clinician-rated assessments of speech and functioning. A computational algorithm designed to detect features of spoken discourse was also examined. Analyses were focused on establishing the reliability and validity of these new measures. RESULTS: Internal consistency was good for Swallowing (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89) and excellent for Speech and the CPIB (both Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0.94), and convergent/discriminant validity was supported. Known groups validity for the PROs was supported by significant group differences among control participants and persons with different stages of HD (all p < 0.0001). All PROs were able to distinguish those with and without clinician-rated dysarthria (likelihood ratios far exceeded the threshold for clinical decision making [all ≥ 3.28]). CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the clinical utility of the HDQLIFE Speech and Swallowing PROs and the CPIB for use across the HD disease spectrum. These PROs also have the potential to be clinically useful in other populations.
PURPOSE: As Huntington disease (HD) progresses, speech and swallowing difficulties become more profound. These difficulties have an adverse effect on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), thus psychometrically robust measures of speech and swallowing are needed to better understand the impact of these domains across the course of the disease. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to establish the clinical utility of two new patient-reported outcome measures (PROs), HDQLIFE Speech Difficulties and HDQLIFE Swallowing Difficulties. METHODS: Thirty-one participants with premanifest or manifest HD, and 31 age- and sex-matched healthy control participants were recruited for this study. Participants completed several PROs [HDQLIFE Speech Difficulties, HDQLIFE Swallowing Difficulties, Communication Participation Item Bank (CPIB)], as well as several clinician-rated assessments of speech and functioning. A computational algorithm designed to detect features of spoken discourse was also examined. Analyses were focused on establishing the reliability and validity of these new measures. RESULTS: Internal consistency was good for Swallowing (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89) and excellent for Speech and the CPIB (both Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0.94), and convergent/discriminant validity was supported. Known groups validity for the PROs was supported by significant group differences among control participants and persons with different stages of HD (all p < 0.0001). All PROs were able to distinguish those with and without clinician-rated dysarthria (likelihood ratios far exceeded the threshold for clinical decision making [all ≥ 3.28]). CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the clinical utility of the HDQLIFE Speech and Swallowing PROs and the CPIB for use across the HD disease spectrum. These PROs also have the potential to be clinically useful in other populations.
Authors: Renée Speyer; Hans C A Bogaardt; Valéria Lima Passos; Nel P H D Roodenburg; Anne Zumach; Mariëlle A M Heijnen; Laura W J Baijens; Stijn J H M Fleskens; Jan W Brunings Journal: J Voice Date: 2008-12-25 Impact factor: 2.009
Authors: K Marder; H Zhao; R H Myers; M Cudkowicz; E Kayson; K Kieburtz; C Orme; J Paulsen; J B Penney; E Siemers; I Shoulson Journal: Neurology Date: 2000-01-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Dawei Liu; Jeffrey D Long; Ying Zhang; Lynn A Raymond; Karen Marder; Anne Rosser; Elizabeth A McCusker; James A Mills; Jane S Paulsen Journal: J Neurol Date: 2015-09-26 Impact factor: 4.849