| Literature DB >> 32839373 |
Pedro Melo1,2, Maria Isabel Sousa3, Matilde Mabui Dimande4, Sónia Taboada5, Maria Assunção Nogueira6, Carlos Pinto7, Maria Henriqueta Figueiredo2,8, Tam H Nguyen9, José Ramón Martínez-Riera10.
Abstract
Effectively responding to children's nutritional status and eating behaviors in Mozambique requires a community-based care approach grounded in sound nursing research that is evidence-based. The Community Assessment, Intervention, and Empowerment Model (MAIEC) is a nursing theoretical model that is based upon clinical decision-making for community health nurses using communities as a unit of care. We used the MAIEC to identify a community-based nursing diagnosis to address children's nutritional status and eating behaviors in Mozambique.Entities:
Keywords: children’s health; community health nursing; community participation; nutritional surveillance; public health; public health nursing
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32839373 PMCID: PMC7504264 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17176108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Clinical Decision Matrix components from Community Assessment, Intervention and Empowerment Model (MAIEC) [1,2,3].
Nursing Diagnoses and Diagnostic Criteria for “Nutritional Status” in Children.
| Nursing Diagnose | Diagnostic Criteria |
|---|---|
| Severe malnutrition status | Composite Z-score equal or below −2 and/or Standard Deviation in the Weight–Height ratio (for children bellow 5 years old) or Standard Deviation in the Body Mass Index (for children over 5 years old) below −2 |
| moderate malnutrition status | Composite Z-score between −2 and −1 and/or Standard Deviation in the Weight–Height ratio (for children bellow 5 years old) or Standard Deviation in the Body Mass Index (for children over 5 years old) between −2 and −1 |
| Low malnutrition status | Composite Z-score between −1 and 0 and/or Standard Deviation in the Weight–Height ratio (for children bellow 5 years old) or Standard Deviation in the Body Mass Index (for children over 5 years old) between −1 and 0 |
| Normal nutritional status | Composite Z-score between 0 and 1 and/or Standard Deviation in the Weight–Height ratio (for children bellow 5 years old) or Standard Deviation in the Body Mass Index (for children over 5 years old) between 0 and 1 |
| High overweight | Composite Z-score between 1 and 2 |
| Very high overweight | Composite Z-score between 2 and 3 and/or Standard Deviation in the Weight–Height ratio (for children bellow 5 years old) or Standard Deviation in the Body Mass Index (for children over 5 years old) between 2 and 3 |
| Extreme high overweight | Composite Z-score over 3 and/or Standard Deviation in the Weight–Height ratio (for children bellow 5 years old) or Standard Deviation in the Body Mass Index (for children over 5 years old) over 3 |
Distribution of Z-Scores from Brachial Mass Area (BMA), Brachial Fat Area (BFA), Brachial Perimeter (BP) and Tricipital Skinfold (TS) and Composite Z-Scores.
| Z-Score Ranges | ZBMA | ZBFA | ZBP | ZTS | Composite | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fi | % | fi | % | Fi | % | fi | % | fi | % | |
| −3.00 a −2.00 | 1 | 0.4 | 1 | 0.4 | 2 | 0.8 | 3 | 1.3 | 0 | 0 |
| −2.00 a −1.00 | 35 | 15.2 | 27 | 11.7 | 35 | 15.2 | 27 | 11.7 | 23 | 10.7 |
| −0.99 a −0.01 | 84 | 37.9 | 100 | 45.1 | 72 | 31.7 | 95 | 42.4 | 92 | 40.6 |
| =0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1.3 |
| 0.00 a 1.00 | 68 | 29.7 | 71 | 31.2 | 83 | 36.4 | 77 | 33.9 | 88 | 38.7 |
| 1.00 a 2.00 | 31 | 13.5 | 22 | 9.2 | 29 | 12.7 | 17 | 7.3 | 18 | 7.5 |
| 2.00 a 3.00 | 8 | 3.3 | 4 | 1.6 | 5 | 2.1 | 5 | 2.1 | 2 | 0.8 |
| >3.00 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.8 | 1 | 0.4 | 3 | 1.3 | 1 | 0.4 |
| Total | 227 | 100.0 | 27 | 100.0 | 272 | 100.0 | 27 | 100.0 | 227 | 100.0 |
Acronyms description: ZBMA-Z-score for Brachial mass area; ZBFA-Z-scores for Brachial Fat Area; ZBP: Z-scores for Brachial Perimeter; ZTS-Z-scores for Tricipital Skinfold.
Percentage Distribution of Children Under 5 Years of Age, in Relation to the Standard Deviation in the Weight–Height Ratio.
| Standard Deviation Weight-Height Ratio | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| −3.00 to −2.00 | 13 | 7.8 |
| −1.99 to −1.01 | 6 | 3.7 |
| −1.00 to −0.01 | 16 | 9.7 |
| 0 | 84 | 50.9 |
| 0.01 to 0.99 | 8 | 4.9 |
| 1.00 to 1.99 | 20 | 12.1 |
| 2.00 to 3.00 | 18 | 10.9 |
| Total | 165 | 100 |
Percentage Distribution of Children Older than 5 Years Evaluated, in Relation to the SD BMI/Age.
| SD BMI/Age | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| −3.00 a −2.00 | 6 | 9.6 |
| −1.00 a −0.01 | 10 | 16.1 |
| 0.00 | 34 | 54.8 |
| 1.00 | 11 | 17.7 |
| 2.00 | 1 | 1.6 |
| Total | 62 | 100 |
SD BMI/age- Standart Deviation for Body Mass Index/age.
Diagnostic Dimensions Diagnoses and Sub-Diagnoses Identified in the Context of the Administrative Management Focus.
| Diagnostic Dimensions Diagnoses | Sub-Diagnoses |
|---|---|
|
| Parental Role: |
| Cognitive dimension | |
| Knowledge about healthy eating (food quality) not shown in 98% | |
| Behavioral dimension: | |
| Adherence behavior to adequate water intake by children not demonstrated: inadequate amount of daily water in 82% | |
| Professional Role (Education Professionals): | |
| Knowledge about assessing children’s nutritional status not demonstrated in 92% of educator | |
| Behavioral dimension: | |
| Adherence behavior to candy consumption control not demonstrated in 70% of educators | |
|
| Inexistence of organizational structures to promote health and healthy eating in children, in the perception of 100% of the evaluated community members; |
|
| Impaired community coping—no previous experience associated with children’s health problems and food perceived by 100% of community members. |