Literature DB >> 32839248

Fatalities related to intimate partner violence: towards a comprehensive perspective.

Julie M Kafka1, Kathryn E Moracco2, Belinda-Rose Young2, Caroline Taheri3, Laurie M Graham4, Rebecca J Macy5, Scott K Proescholdbell6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2015, 1350 people in the US were killed by their current or former intimate partner. Intimate partner violence (IPV) can also fatally injure family members or friends, and IPV may be a risk factor for suicide. Without accounting for all these outcomes, policymakers, funders, researchers and public health practitioners may underestimate the role that IPV plays in violent death.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to enumerate the total contribution of IPV to violent death. Currently, no data holistically report on this problem.
METHODS: We used Violent Death Reporting System (VDRS) data to identify all IPV-related violent deaths in North Carolina, 2010-2017. These included intimate partner homicides, corollary deaths, homicide-suicides, single suicides and legal intervention deaths. We used the existing IPV variable in VDRS, linked deaths from the same incident and manually reviewed 2440 suicide narratives where intimate partner problems or stalking were a factor in the death.
RESULTS: IPV contributes to more than 1 in 10 violent deaths (10.3%). This represents an age-adjusted rate of 1.97 per 100 000 persons. Of the IPV-related violent deaths we identified, 39.3% were victims of intimate partner homicide, 17.4% corollary victims, 11.4% suicides in a homicide-suicide event, 29.8% suicides in a suicide-only event and 2.0% legal intervention deaths. IMPLICATIONS: If researchers only include intimate partner homicides, they may miss over 60% of IPV-related deaths. Our novel study shows the importance of taking a comprehensive approach to prevent IPV and decrease violent deaths. IPV is a risk factor for suicide as well as homicide. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  firearm; gender; mortality; surveillance; violence

Year:  2020        PMID: 32839248     DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2020-043704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inj Prev        ISSN: 1353-8047            Impact factor:   2.399


  5 in total

1.  Exploring a Dance/Movement Program on Mental Health and Well-Being in Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence During a Pandemic.

Authors:  Yasemin Özümerzifon; Allison Ross; Tessa Brinza; Gina Gibney; Carol Ewing Garber
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 5.435

Review 2.  The Arizona Intimate Partner Homicide (AzIPH) Study: a Step toward Updating and Expanding Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Homicide.

Authors:  Jill Theresa Messing; Millan A AbiNader; Jesenia M Pizarro; Jacquelyn C Campbell; Megan Lindsay Brown; Karissa R Pelletier
Journal:  J Fam Violence       Date:  2021-02-25

3.  Disparities in potential years of life lost due to intimate partner violence: Data from 16 states for 2006-2015.

Authors:  Laurie M Graham; Shabbar I Ranapurwala; Catherine Zimmer; Rebecca J Macy; Cynthia F Rizo; Paul Lanier; Sandra L Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Intimate partner violence victimization and perpetration as precursors to suicide.

Authors:  Julie M Kafka; Kathryn Beth E Moracco; Caroline Taheri; Belinda-Rose Young; Laurie M Graham; Rebecca J Macy; Scott Proescholdbell
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2022-03-25

5.  Development and Psychometric Assessment of a Questionnaire for the Detection of Invisible Violence against Women.

Authors:  Iria Dobarrio-Sanz; Anabel Fernández-Vargas; Alba Fernández-Férez; Diana Patricia Vanegas-Coveña; Otilia Vanessa Cordero-Ahiman; José Granero-Molina; Cayetano Fernández-Sola; José Manuel Hernández-Padilla
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.