Literature DB >> 32839240

How Much Does Ne Vary Among Species?

Nicolas Galtier1, Marjolaine Rousselle2,3.   

Abstract

Genetic drift is an important evolutionary force of strength inversely proportional to Ne , the effective population size. The impact of drift on genome diversity and evolution is known to vary among species, but quantifying this effect is a difficult task. Here we assess the magnitude of variation in drift power among species of animals via its effect on the mutation load - which implies also inferring the distribution of fitness effects of deleterious mutations. To this aim, we analyze the nonsynonymous (amino-acid changing) and synonymous (amino-acid conservative) allele frequency spectra in a large sample of metazoan species, with a focus on the primates vs. fruit flies contrast. We show that a Gamma model of the distribution of fitness effects is not suitable due to strong differences in estimated shape parameters among taxa, while adding a class of lethal mutations essentially solves the problem. Using the Gamma + lethal model and assuming that the mean deleterious effects of nonsynonymous mutations is shared among species, we estimate that the power of drift varies by a factor of at least 500 between large-Ne and small-Ne species of animals, i.e., an order of magnitude more than the among-species variation in genetic diversity. Our results are relevant to Lewontin's paradox while further questioning the meaning of the Ne parameter in population genomics.
Copyright © 2020 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  distribution of fitness effects; genetic drift; mutation load; population size; site-frequency spectrum

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32839240      PMCID: PMC7536855          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.120.303622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  69 in total

1.  Changing effective population size and the McDonald-Kreitman test.

Authors:  Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Distinguishing between selective sweeps and demography using DNA polymorphism data.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Jensen; Yuseob Kim; Vanessa Bauer DuMont; Charles F Aquadro; Carlos D Bustamante
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  The repatterning of eukaryotic genomes by random genetic drift.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; Louis-Marie Bobay; Francesco Catania; Jean-François Gout; Mina Rho
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 8.929

4.  Joint inference of the distribution of fitness effects of deleterious mutations and population demography based on nucleotide polymorphism frequencies.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations.

Authors:  Adam Eyre-Walker; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Characterizing the influence of effective population size on the rate of adaptation: Gillespie's Darwin domain.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Jensen; Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 3.416

7.  Genetic diversity in the interference selection limit.

Authors:  Benjamin H Good; Aleksandra M Walczak; Richard A Neher; Michael M Desai
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Natural selection constrains neutral diversity across a wide range of species.

Authors:  Russell B Corbett-Detig; Daniel L Hartl; Timothy B Sackton
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Inferring the Frequency Spectrum of Derived Variants to Quantify Adaptive Molecular Evolution in Protein-Coding Genes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; José L Campos; Tom R Booker; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Reference-free population genomics from next-generation transcriptome data and the vertebrate-invertebrate gap.

Authors:  Philippe Gayral; José Melo-Ferreira; Sylvain Glémin; Nicolas Bierne; Miguel Carneiro; Benoit Nabholz; Joao M Lourenco; Paulo C Alves; Marion Ballenghien; Nicolas Faivre; Khalid Belkhir; Vincent Cahais; Etienne Loire; Aurélien Bernard; Nicolas Galtier
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  7 in total

1.  Strong neutral sweeps occurring during a population contraction.

Authors:  Antoine Moinet; Flávia Schlichta; Stephan Peischl; Laurent Excoffier
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The Impact of Purifying and Background Selection on the Inference of Population History: Problems and Prospects.

Authors:  Parul Johri; Kellen Riall; Hannes Becher; Laurent Excoffier; Brian Charlesworth; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  The impact of purifying and background selection on the inference of population history: problems and prospects.

Authors:  Parul Johri; Kellen Riall; Hannes Becher; Laurent Excoffier; Brian Charlesworth; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  bioRxiv       Date:  2021-01-18

4.  Factors That Affect the Rates of Adaptive and Nonadaptive Evolution at the Gene Level in Humans and Chimpanzees.

Authors:  Vivak Soni; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.416

Review 5.  impMKT: the imputed McDonald and Kreitman test, a straightforward correction that significantly increases the evidence of positive selection of the McDonald and Kreitman test at the gene level.

Authors:  Jesús Murga-Moreno; Marta Coronado-Zamora; Sònia Casillas; Antonio Barbadilla
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.542

6.  Hunting for Beneficial Mutations: Conditioning on SIFT Scores When Estimating the Distribution of Fitness Effect of New Mutations.

Authors:  Jun Chen; Thomas Bataillon; Sylvain Glémin; Martin Lascoux
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.416

7.  Inferring Long-Term Effective Population Size with Mutation-Selection Models.

Authors:  Thibault Latrille; Vincent Lanore; Nicolas Lartillot
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 16.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.