Katarina Foley1, Nelson Granchi1, Jessica Reid1, Lisa Leopardi1, Guy Maddern2. 1. Department of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, South Australia, Australia. 2. Department of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, South Australia, Australia. Electronic address: Guy.Maddern@adelaide.edu.au.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Coaching has been proposed as a potential form of continuing professional development (CPD) for surgeons. Our study aimed to elicit qualified surgeons' perceptions of peer coaching as a form of CPD and to determine the effect of demographic factors on surgeons' views. METHODS: A cross-sectional paper survey was conducted across 2 South Australian metropolitan hospitals from November 2018 to January 2019. This comprised 5 demographic questions and 6 Likert items eliciting views on peer-based coaching and was distributed at departmental unit meetings to surgical consultants and fellows. Participation was voluntary and a definition of "peer-based coaching" was provided. RESULTS: Hundred and eighteen surgeons of a possible 125 (94.4% response rate) from 8 surgical specialties completed the survey with 45.4% (n = 54) having received coaching since obtaining their fellowship. The majority of participants (72.9%, n = 86) reported consultant surgeons would benefit from peer coaching and that one-on-one coaching in an individual setting would be a useful CPD activity (73.7%, n = 87). Just over half the participants (53.4%, n = 63) felt that coaching by a nonsurgeon such as a psychologist would benefit their nonoperative skills. Many participants (61.8%, n = 73) felt more inclined to participate if CPD points were awarded. Despite the support in favor of coaching, a significant percentage of participants (45.8%, n = 54) wanted further evidence of its efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: There is support amongst surgeons for peer coaching and its inclusion as a form of CPD, however, many require more evidence of its benefits, thus highlighting the need for ongoing research studies, consultation and pilot coaching programs.
OBJECTIVE: Coaching has been proposed as a potential form of continuing professional development (CPD) for surgeons. Our study aimed to elicit qualified surgeons' perceptions of peer coaching as a form of CPD and to determine the effect of demographic factors on surgeons' views. METHODS: A cross-sectional paper survey was conducted across 2 South Australian metropolitan hospitals from November 2018 to January 2019. This comprised 5 demographic questions and 6 Likert items eliciting views on peer-based coaching and was distributed at departmental unit meetings to surgical consultants and fellows. Participation was voluntary and a definition of "peer-based coaching" was provided. RESULTS: Hundred and eighteen surgeons of a possible 125 (94.4% response rate) from 8 surgical specialties completed the survey with 45.4% (n = 54) having received coaching since obtaining their fellowship. The majority of participants (72.9%, n = 86) reported consultant surgeons would benefit from peer coaching and that one-on-one coaching in an individual setting would be a useful CPD activity (73.7%, n = 87). Just over half the participants (53.4%, n = 63) felt that coaching by a nonsurgeon such as a psychologist would benefit their nonoperative skills. Many participants (61.8%, n = 73) felt more inclined to participate if CPD points were awarded. Despite the support in favor of coaching, a significant percentage of participants (45.8%, n = 54) wanted further evidence of its efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: There is support amongst surgeons for peer coaching and its inclusion as a form of CPD, however, many require more evidence of its benefits, thus highlighting the need for ongoing research studies, consultation and pilot coaching programs.
Authors: Caprice C Greenberg; Mary E Byrnes; Tedi A Engler; Jyothi R Thumma; Justin B Dimick; Sudha Pavuluri Quamme Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 13.787