Literature DB >> 32838425

Association Between Surgeon Technical Skills and Patient Outcomes.

Jonah J Stulberg1,2, Reiping Huang1,2, Lindsey Kreutzer1,2, Kristen Ban1,3, Bradley J Champagne4, Scott R Steele5, Julie K Johnson1,2, Jane L Holl6, Caprice C Greenberg7, Karl Y Bilimoria1,2,3.   

Abstract

Importance: Postoperative complications remain common after surgery, but little is known about the extent of variation in operative technical skill and whether variation is associated with patient outcomes.
Objectives: To examine the (1) variation in technical skill scores of practicing surgeons, (2) association between technical skills and patient outcomes, and (3) amount of variation in patient outcomes explained by a surgeon's technical skill. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this quality improvement study, 17 practicing surgeons submitted a video of a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy that was then rated by at least 10 blinded peer surgeons and 2 expert raters. The association between surgeon technical skill scores and risk-adjusted outcomes was examined using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. The association between technical skill scores and outcomes was examined for colorectal procedures and noncolorectal procedures (ie, assessed on whether technical skills demonstrated during colectomy were associated with patient outcomes across other cases). In addition, the proportion of patient outcomes explained by technical skill scores was examined using robust regression techniques. The study was conducted from September 23, 2016, to February 10, 2018; data analysis was performed from November 2018 to January 2019. Exposures: Colorectal and noncolorectal procedures. Main Outcomes and Measures: Any complication, mortality, unplanned hospital readmission, unplanned reoperation related to principal procedure, surgical site infection, and death or serious morbidity.
Results: Of the 17 surgeons included in the study, 13 were men (76%). The participants had a range from 1 to 28 years in surgical practice (median, 11 years). Based on 10 or more reviewers per video and with a maximum quality score of 5, overall technical skill scores ranged from 2.8 to 4.6. From 2014 to 2016, study participants performed a total of 3063 procedures (1120 colectomies). Higher technical skill scores were significantly associated with lower rates of any complication (15.5% vs 20.6%, P = .03; Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient r = -0.54, P = .03), unplanned reoperation (4.7% vs 7.2%, P = .02; r = -0.60, P = .01), and a composite measure of death or serious morbidity (15.9% vs 21.4%, P = .02; r = -0.60, P = .01) following colectomy. Similar associations were found between colectomy technical skill scores and patient outcomes for all types of procedures performed by a surgeon. Overall, technical skill scores appeared to account for 25.8% of the variation in postcolectomy complication rates and 27.5% of the variation when including noncolectomy complication rates. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that there is wide variation in technical skill among practicing surgeons, accounting for more than 25% of the variation in patient outcomes. Higher colectomy technical skill scores appear to be associated with lower complication rates for colectomy and for all other procedures performed by a surgeon. Efforts to improve surgeon technical skills may result in better patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32838425      PMCID: PMC7439214          DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  23 in total

1.  Error in Author Byline.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Effects of Longitudinal Coaching on Relationships and Feedback Processes in Pediatric Subspecialty Fellowships-An Interpretive Description Study.

Authors:  Priya G Jain; Mary E McBride; Anne Caliendo; Walter Eppich
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2022-08

3.  Towards interpretable, medically grounded, EMR-based risk prediction models.

Authors:  Isabell Twick; Guy Zahavi; Haggai Benvenisti; Ronya Rubinstein; Michael S Woods; Haim Berkenstadt; Aviram Nissan; Enes Hosgor; Dan Assaf
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Executive summary of the artificial intelligence in surgery series.

Authors:  Tyler J Loftus; Alexander P J Vlaar; Andrew J Hung; Azra Bihorac; Bradley M Dennis; Catherine Juillard; Daniel A Hashimoto; Haytham M A Kaafarani; Patrick J Tighe; Paul C Kuo; Shuhei Miyashita; Steven D Wexner; Kevin E Behrns
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2021-11-21       Impact factor: 4.348

5.  StOP? II trial: cluster randomized clinical trial to test the implementation of a toolbox for structured communication in the operating room-study protocol.

Authors:  Sandra Keller; Franziska Tschan; Norbert K Semmer; Sven Trelle; Tanja Manser; Guido Beldi
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 2.728

Review 6.  Simulation for Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Lisa Parker; Suvranu De; Muneera Kapadia; Alessandro Fichera
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 1.878

7.  Continuous monitoring of surgical bimanual expertise using deep neural networks in virtual reality simulation.

Authors:  Recai Yilmaz; Alexander Winkler-Schwartz; Nykan Mirchi; Aiden Reich; Sommer Christie; Dan Huy Tran; Nicole Ledwos; Ali M Fazlollahi; Carlo Santaguida; Abdulrahman J Sabbagh; Khalid Bajunaid; Rolando Del Maestro
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-04-26

8.  Enhanced Training Benefits of Video Recording Surgery With Automated Hand Motion Analysis.

Authors:  Colin F Mackenzie; Shiming Yang; Evan Garofalo; Peter Fu-Ming Hu; Darcy Watts; Rajan Patel; Adam Puche; George Hagegeorge; Valerie Shalin; Kristy Pugh; Guinevere Granite; Lynn G Stansbury; Stacy Shackelford; Samuel Tisherman
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  GDI2 is a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Wen Zhang; Zhongjian Liu; Shilin Xia; Lei Yao; Lan Li; Ziying Gan; Hui Tang; Qiang Guo; Xinmin Yan; Zhiwei Sun
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 5.682

10.  ClipAssistNet: bringing real-time safety feedback to operating rooms.

Authors:  Florian Aspart; Jon L Bolmgren; Joël L Lavanchy; Guido Beldi; Michael S Woods; Nicolas Padoy; Enes Hosgor
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.