| Literature DB >> 32837297 |
Masato Takahashi1,2, Ryo Takahashi1, Yasuhiro Morihara3, Isseki Kin4, Keiko Ogawa-Ochiai5, Norimichi Tsumura6.
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a color reproduction method using color charts to improve the color quality of a telemedicine system. Owing to the spread of COVID-19, the need for telemedicine is rapidly increasing to prevent infections more effectively. However, in practices such as traditional Japanese (Kampo) medicine, where color is used as an important examination factor, an accurate diagnosis cannot be made without adequate color reproduction. In telemedicine using a commercially available smartphone, color reproducibility may deteriorate owing to differences in the devices and lighting, which may result in a misdiagnosis. Therefore, we created a color chart that includes the colors of the human skin and tongue as a tool to help doctors identify the color of patients more accurately when conducting a telemedicine examination. Through a subjective evaluation by eight medical doctors, it was unanimously found that the proposed method is practical in terms of a color examination. The developed color chart can also be used for an automatic color correction. © International Society of Artificial Life and Robotics (ISAROB) 2020.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Color reproduction; Color-chart; Remote diagnostic; Telemedicine
Year: 2020 PMID: 32837297 PMCID: PMC7372208 DOI: 10.1007/s10015-020-00627-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Artif Life Robot ISSN: 1433-5298
Fig. 1Proposed color chart arrangement and selection of seven important colors (color figure online)
L* a* b* color values for the proposed color chart
| 97, 0, 0 | 28, 24, − 55 | 43, − 12, 18 | 52, 50, 13 | 58,27,7 | |
| 87, 0, 0 | 67, 20, 14 | 51, 0, − 25 | 56, − 37, 30 | 60, 20, 5 | |
| 76, 0, 0 | 62, 38, 55 | 82, 6, 74 | 42, 57, 24 | 78, 30, 15 | |
| 64, 0, 0 | 72, 22, 62 | 40, 14, − 47 | 70, − 30, − 4 | 48, 25, 2 | |
| 51, 0, 0 | 30, 27, − 26 | 38, 17, 12 | 55, 14, − 30 | 33, 40, 30 | |
| 36, 0, 0 | 50, 54, − 18 | 51, − 21, − 30 | 73, − 22, 54 | 72, 8,22 |
The L*a*b* color value is calculated using white reference plate under D50 light source
Fig. 2Usability survey by comparing color charts (color figure online)
Evaluation results by eight medical doctors for the proposed color chart
| No | Comments |
|---|---|
| 1 | I think it is very good to have a color checker, because I can make corrections depending on the model and lighting. Because it is difficult to judge a moving image, it seems good to receive multiple still images to make such a judgment |
| 2 | Once I got used to it, I was able to use it |
| 3 | I felt that the color chart leads to an objective diagnosis |
| 4 | I found it difficult to tell if there was a shadow or not unless the light came from the front of the tongue. If possible, images taken from three directions, the frontal, first oblique, and second oblique, would provide a more reliable diagnosis. But it would be complicated |
| 5 | For the tongue color, if you are unfamiliar to you, there may be subjective impression of the color, so I think the proposal is good |
| 6 | It seems to be useful for telemedicine. I hope to the patients and doctors will get used to it |
| 7 | Until now, I was unable to understand what I was looking at, but I felt the potential of the chart |
| 8 | Skin diseases can be diagnosed accurately by the simultaneous color checker and imaging of the affected area before and after treatment and over time |
Fig. 3Selfie photo (color figure online)
Fig. 4Overview of automatic color correction method (color figure online)
Fig. 5Automatic color correction result (color figure online)
Error for seven important colors in Fig. 1
| Patch number | ||
|---|---|---|
| Proposed method | Using general 24 colors (excluding tongue colors) | |
| E–a (Tang, fur) | 3.4 | 10.0 |
| E–b (Tang) | 0.8 | 4.3 |
| E–c (Skin, dermatitis) | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| E–d (Tang) | 11.1 | 9.0 |
| E–e (Tang) | 17.3 | 13.4 |
| E–f (Tang, fur) | 1.4 | 3.3 |
| D–a (Tang) | 1.2 | 7.1 |