| Literature DB >> 32837236 |
Muhammad Nauman Habib1, Waseef Jamal2, Uzma Khalil3, Zunnoorain Khan1.
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to understand the automation of Higher Education Institutes (HEIs), and to evaluate the automated process from the perspective of developing country. A single case study of City University of Science and Information Technology (CUSIT), Pakistan was selected as a unit of analysis. Mix methodology was used in this research. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted from the top management as a primary source while secondary data regarding usage and functions of LMS was collected for the period of 2 years (four semesters Fall-2017-Spring 2019). Data from both sources was utilized, and triangulated for case building and analysis. It was found that CUSIT has a state-of-the-art automated infrastructure, management information system (MIS) and learning management system (LMS) which facilitates faculty, staff and administration. LMS provides an integrated and digital platform to key stakeholders particularly to the teachers for sharing course outlines, lesson plan, assignment generation and submission, announcements and generating assessment reports. Similarly, the student gets access to all course material, assignments, assessment report, notices, and other relevant information at any point of time. However, the system lacks some of the major E-learning features with limited support to the large file size, real time learning, online classes, real time feedback and query system etc. Furthermore, this study identified few seldomly used functions of automated system as well as few duplications and operational activities which requires consideration by the management. The case of CUSIT proves to be a practical case for all those universities who are facing challenges due to corona virus pandemic and are looking for a solution to continue education through distance learning and e-learning platforms. This study supports the automation of HEIs and provides lesson learned for the academia and management of HEIs by identification of success features as well as limitations of the system. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.Entities:
Keywords: Automation; Case study; E-learning; Learning management system; Management information system
Year: 2020 PMID: 32837236 PMCID: PMC7347406 DOI: 10.1007/s10639-020-10237-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Educ Inf Technol (Dordr) ISSN: 1360-2357
Fig. 1Thematic network
Fig. 2Automated CUSIT campus
Fig. 3Usage of CULMS e-learning and assessment
Fig. 4Average usage of CULMS by department
Fig. 5Student’s application status session-wise
MIS functions and reports available to key stakeholders
| Registrar | Examination | SSO | Faculty | HoD/Coordinator | Library | Accounts & Finance | Admin | CDC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Admin report | x | X | x | ||||||
| Batch-wise report | x | X | x | ||||||
| Requisition | x | x | X | x | X | x | x | x | x |
| Reg. courses info | x | x | |||||||
| Fee record | x | x | X | x | |||||
| Attendance report | x | x | |||||||
| Courses system | x | ||||||||
| Exam record | x | x | |||||||
| Exempt courses | x | X | |||||||
| Memo | x | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | x |
| Program transfer | x | x | |||||||
| Scholarships | x | X | x | ||||||
| Semester courses | x | x | X | x | |||||
| Registered courses | x | x | x | x | x | ||||
| Student attendance | x | x | X | x | x | ||||
| Student clearance | x | X | |||||||
| Student biodata | x | x | x | x | x | ||||
| Short attendance | x | ||||||||
| Faculty report | x | ||||||||
| Teacher/subject | x | ||||||||
| Timetable | x | x | x | ||||||
| Warning letter | x | x | |||||||
| Personnel file | x | ||||||||
| Admissions | x | ||||||||
| Alumni data | x | x | |||||||
| Certificate | x | ||||||||
| Contact hour report | x | x | |||||||
| Employee attendance | x | x | x | ||||||
| Convocation | x | ||||||||
| SMS students | x | x | x | ||||||
| Provisional certificate | x | ||||||||
| Degree | x | ||||||||
| Transcript | x | ||||||||
| Award list | x | ||||||||
| Pre-requisites | X | x | |||||||
| Degree status | x | ||||||||
| Gazette | x | ||||||||
| Marks evaluation | x | x | |||||||
| Paper attempt | x | ||||||||
| Exam schedule | x | ||||||||
| Students status | x | ||||||||
| Courses transfer | x | ||||||||
| Employee record | x | ||||||||
| Batch intake duration | X | ||||||||
| Courses registration | X | ||||||||
| Semester plan | X | ||||||||
| Make up classes | X | x | x | ||||||
| New batch/semester | X | ||||||||
| Courses allocation | X | ||||||||
| Teacher allocation | X | ||||||||
| Section-wise students | X | ||||||||
| Semester-wise students | X | ||||||||
| Students clash | X | ||||||||
| Tour/trip | X | ||||||||
| Course outline | x | x | |||||||
| Students evaluation | x | ||||||||
| Manual attendance | x | x | |||||||
| MCQ bank | x | x | |||||||
| Student detail | x | x | x | x | |||||
| All academic report | x | ||||||||
| New semester courses | x | ||||||||
| Teacher’s report | x | ||||||||
| Registered courses | x | x | |||||||
| Survey results | x | ||||||||
| Voucher | x | ||||||||
| Employee salary | x | ||||||||
| Account summary | x | ||||||||
| Account entry | x | ||||||||
| Student fee | x | ||||||||
| Payroll | x | ||||||||
| Fee refund | x | ||||||||
| Student payments | x | ||||||||
| Transport | x | x | |||||||
| Course alternance | x | ||||||||
| Timetable | X | x |
Fig. 6Role of Teacher, Student and Department in CULMS
Fig. 7Admin Staff Role in CULMS