| Literature DB >> 32837138 |
Ashok Kumar Patel1, Deepika Lodha1, Narpat S Shekhawat1.
Abstract
Mitragyna parvifolia (Roxb.) Korth., commonly known as "Kadam," is an endangered and pharmaceutically valued tree of the family Rubiaceae. The numerous medicinal properties are attributed to the various alkaloids of this plant. Poor seedling survival (due to very small size of seeds, approximately 10,000 per gm), overexploitation and habitat destruction are the major constraints in conserving the wild stocks of this species. This paper reports a significant, improved, and repeatable micropropagation protocol of M. parvifolia using nodal explants of a mature tree. Nodal explants harvested during spring season from the lopped tree differentiated the maximum number of axillary shoots (5.3 ± 0.82 per node) on full-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium containing 3.0 mg L-1 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and additives (25 mg L-1 each of adenine sulfate, L-arginine, and citric acid and 50 mg L-1 ascorbic acid). Shoots were amplified in vitro through (1) recurrent transfer of mother explants and (2) subculturing on fresh nutrient medium. The greatest number of shoots (13.4 ± 1.26) with an average length of 6.2 ± 1.03 cm was produced after 4 wk on MS medium containing 0.5 mg L-1 BAP, 0.25 mg L-1 kinetin (Kin), 0.1 mg L-1 Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), additives, 100 mg L-1 activated charcoal (AC), and 0.8% (w/v) agar. This is the first report of concurrent ex vitro rooting and acclimatization (CEVRA) in M. parvifolia. About 90% micropropagated shoots rooted ex vitro on pulse treatment of 500 mg L-1 Indole-3-butyric acid (IBA; for 5 min) and produced 8.5 ± 0.97 roots per shoot with an average length of 9.40 ± 1.06 cm, after 5 wk. Over 80% of CEVRA plantlets were successfully transplanted to the soil in field. The defined protocol can be employed for conservation ex situ and restoration/rehabilitation/reintroduction in situ of M. parvifolia. © The Society for In Vitro Biology 2020.Entities:
Keywords: Endangered tree; Ex situ conservation; Ex vitro rooting; Micropropagation; Mitragyna parvifolia
Year: 2020 PMID: 32837138 PMCID: PMC7307943 DOI: 10.1007/s11627-020-10089-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant ISSN: 1054-5476 Impact factor: 2.252
Fig. 1.Mitragyna parvifolia (Roxb.) Korth. (a) Habit. (b) An inflorescence. (c) Fruiting stage.
Effect of Murashige and Skoog medium containing 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and kinetin (Kin) on bud-breaking from mature nodal explants of Mitragyna parvifolia (Roxb.) Korth. (after 4 wk)
| Cytokinins (mg L−1) | % explants responded | Average shoot number ± SD | Average shoot length (cm) ± SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAP | Kin | |||
| Control | - | 0.0g | 0.0 ± 0.0g | 0.0 ± 0.0f |
| 1.0 | - | 57.1d | 1.9 ± 0.56d | 1.38 ± 0.29d |
| 2.0 | - | 72.3b | 3.1 ± 0.73c | 2.41 ± 0.40c |
| 3.0 | - | 89.4a | 5.3 ± 0.82a | 3.69 ± 0.59a |
| 4.0 | - | 75.2b | 3.9 ± 0.73b | 3.01 ± 0.41b |
| - | 1.0 | 20.7f | 0.7 ± 0.23f | 0.84 ± 0.26e |
| - | 2.0 | 48.2e | 1.3 ± 0.67e | 0.90 ± 0.31e |
| - | 3.0 | 63.0c | 2.1 ± 0.73d | 1.99 ± 0.41c |
| - | 4.0 | 72.4b | 3.2 ± 0.78c | 2.98 ± 0.47b |
Means in each column followed by same letters at superscript are not significantly different according to Duncan’s Multiple Range Test at P < 0.05
Fig. 2.Micropropagation protocol of Mitragyna parvifolia (Roxb.) Korth. (a) Shoot bud induction on Muraghige and Skoog medium + 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP; 3.0 mg L−1) supplemented with additives (after 4 wk). (b) Shoot amplification through recurrent transfer of mother explant on MS medium containing BAP (1.0 mg L−1), Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA; 0.1 mg L−1), additives, and activated charcoal (AC; 100 mg L−1) after second passage (after 4 wk). (c) and (d) Shoot amplification through subculturing of in vitro formed shoots on MS medium containing BAP 0.5 mg L−1, kinetin 0.25 mg L−1, IAA 0.1 mg L−1, additives, and AC 100 mg L−1 on 0.8% (w/v) agar-gelled medium after 3 wk and 4 wk, respectively. (e) Ex vitro rooting in shoots treated with Indole-3-butyric acid (IBA; 500 mg L−1) for 5 min (after 5 wk). f Hardened plants transferred to earthen pots (after 8 wk).
Effect of Murashige and Skoog medium containing additives, 100 mg L−1 activated charcoal, and various concentration and combination of PGRs on shoot amplification through subculturing of in vitro-formed shoots of Mitragyna parvifolia (Roxb.) Korth. (after 4 wk)
| Concentrations of PGRs (mg L−1) | Average shoot number ± SD | Average shoot length (cm) ± SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAP | Kin | IAA | ||
| Control | - | - | 0.0 ± 0.0i | 0.0 ± 0.0g |
| 0.25 | - | - | 2.1 ± 0.56h | 3.29 ± 0.39f |
| 0.5 | - | - | 4.2 ± 0.78ef | 3.79 ± 0.46e |
| 1.0 | - | - | 3.1 ± 0.73g | 4.69 ± 0.52d |
| 0.5 | 0.25 | - | 7.1 ± 0.87d | 5.19 ± 0.59c |
| 0.5 | 0.5 | - | 5.0 ± 0.81e | 5.8 ± 0.67ab |
| 0.5 | 1.0 | - | 3.9 ± 0.73fg | 4.19 ± 0.48de |
| 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.05 | 10.1 ± 0.99b | 5.4 ± 0.60bc |
| 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 13.4 ± 1.26a | 6.2 ± 1.03a |
| 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.20 | 8.7 ± 0.94c | 4.30 ± 0.52d |
Means in each column followed by same letters at superscript are not significantly different according to Duncan’s Multiple Range Test at P < 0.05
6-benzylaminopurine (BAP), kinetin (Kin), and Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)
Influence of Indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) and α-Naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) on ex vitro rooting of micropropagated shoots of Mitragyna parvifolia (Roxb.) Korth. (after 5 wk)
| Auxins (mg L−1) | % shoots rooted | Average root number ± SD | Average root length (cm) ± SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBA | NAA | |||
| Control | - | 0.0g | 0.0 ± 0.0h | 0.0 ± 0.0e |
| 100 | - | 54.2e | 2.2 ± 0.63f | 2.90 ± 0.77d |
| 300 | - | 69.0c | 5.3 ± 0.82bc | 5.39 ± 0.84b |
| 500 | - | 90.1a | 8.5 ± 0.97a | 9.40 ± 1.06a |
| 700 | - | 75.3b | 6.1 ± 0.87b | 5.89 ± 0.90b |
| - | 100 | 35.7f | 1.1 ± 0.73g | 2.30 ± 0.68d |
| - | 300 | 54.1e | 3.2 ± 0.78e | 3.10 ± 0.75d |
| - | 500 | 66.1c | 5.0 ± 0.81cd | 4.45 ± 0.83c |
| - | 700 | 60.3d | 4.2 ± 0.78d | 4.00 ± 0.81c |
IBA and NAA pulse treatment duration: 5 min. Means in each column followed by same letters at superscript are not significantly different according to Duncan’s Multiple Range Test at P < 0.05