Literature DB >> 32837070

ASI's Consensus Guidelines: ABCs of What to Do and What Not During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

S P Somashekhar1, H V Shivaram2, Santhosh John Abhaham3, Abhay Dalvi4, Arvind Kumar5, Dilip Gode6, Shiva Misra7, Sanjay Kumar Jain8, C R K Prasad9, Raghu Ram Pillarisetti10.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32837070      PMCID: PMC7280171          DOI: 10.1007/s12262-020-02452-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN: 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

The rapid pandemic status of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by a novel virus—severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS COV 2)—has taken tragic proportions and created havoc in health care systems across the globe. There has been a recent surge of COVID-19 infection in India. As of 26 May 2020, 145,380 new cases and 4167 deaths were reported in the country [1]. This potentially long-winding epidemic situation in India has overwhelmed the capacity of outpatient facilities, emergency departments (EDs), hospitals, and intensive care units, leading to critical shortages of staff, space, and supplies, resulting in patient outcomes and safety being compromised. This crisis resulted in significant challenges for decision-makers to balance the need for the continued delivery of other health services. Thus, it is essential to strengthen the health systems and reorganize the service delivery in response to COVID-19 crisis. During this rapidly changing environment, a set of evidence-based and consensus-driven guidelines from a professional expert peer group is the need of the hour. Healthcare workers must determine a novel way to address issues such as—who should have surgery and how it should be performed. Strict personal and institutional practices need to be adopted, and policies to allow “new best practices” must be implemented to ensure the best prevention measures against COVID-19 infection in public, and indeed, private healthcare facilities. WHO has issued a wide range of technical guidance on the COVID-19 response emphasizing the important health system measures and policies reflecting clinical and public health action [2]. In addition, detailed guidelines were published by national and international bodies such as MOHFW [3] as well as SAGES and EAES [4] on surgical strategies in relation to COVID-19 crisis. Although these guidelines are empirical, The Association of Surgeons of India (ASI) has embarked upon bringing out Consensus Statements that aim to empower the surgical fraternity in India with regard to decision making, resource allocation, infection prevention/control measures among patients and healthcare staff, indications for triage and management of cancer patients, prioritization of surgical approaches and maintaining core essential services across the continuum of care (Fig. 1). Based on frontline practical experiences and standard national as well as international guidelines as a framework to describe the recommendations, a panel of experts developed evidence-based Consensus Opinion on wide ranging issues, which is applicable to all public and private healthcare settings across India.
Fig. 1

Depicting the various roles of a surgeon during COVID-19 pandemic

Depicting the various roles of a surgeon during COVID-19 pandemic In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, these guidelines could help healthcare professionals provide timely, high-quality surgical care that achieves the best outcomes for patients, while minimizing the risk of infection.

Consensus Group

The consensus panel comprised of ASI President, chief office bearers of ASI, former ASI Presidents (2015–2019), and a couple of eminent professionals, which included heads of the major teaching institutions, both in the government and private sectors. After procuring active inputs from across the country, 27 key questions that needed to be addressed were identified. These questions were further subsectioned and sent out by email to the panel members across India well before calling for a web-based virtual expert consensus Panel discussion. An online meeting of the consensus group members, presided and moderated by the President of ASI, was held on May 3, 2020. Panel members presented the evidence and practical recommendations for each of the questions allotted to them. The consensus was derived from all the 27 key questions, and to ensure accuracy, the proceedings of this meeting were audio recorded. The consensus-based document outlines several topics concerning the various activities involved in the process of care and defines the gamut of precautions for surgeons to follow.

Key Recommendations on Professional Attire, Transportation, Infection Control, and Preventive Measures

Transmission within healthcare setting plays an important role in the spread of the disease [5]. Standard preventive measures need to be carried out by surgeons to protect oneself, patients as well as family members, and equally, to minimize the contamination. Institutional infection prevention practices should be established in the care of patients and healthcare workers all of the time. In these unprecedented times, health care providers need to meticulously take all preventive measures available even while commuting to and from the hospital. Table 1 summarizes the general precautions recommended by ASI for surgeons to pursue.
Table 1

ASI general recommendations for surgeons

Dress code for surgeons
While leaving from home• Place the travel dress in a cupboard
• Wear simple dress with shoes and socks• Wear appropriate mask
• No accessories like watch, ring, tie, coat, wallet• Clean your mobile frequently before, during, and after patient care activities. Mobile phones may be kept in a Ziploc bag during work activities. The phone can be used while in the bag
• Wear mask
After reaching work placeWhile leaving hospital
• Change to hospital scrub suite• Remove the hospital scrub and subject it to proper wash
• Change the footwear on entering hospital premise while donning scrubs
Commute to work place
• Best is to use own vehicle• Sanitize hands after getting in and after getting down the vehicle
• Avoid public transport as much as possible and Taxi approved by government (latest)• In case if commuted through public or shared vehicle, maintain physical distance.
Point of entry screening and check-in to protect both patients and healthcare
• Ensure separate entry for healthcare workers and for patients• Staff members must ensure if patients are sanitizing hands and wearing mask properly or not.
• For patients—at the entry, a senior health care worker/staff nurse should check the temperature along with check-history of fever, signs of cough, throat pain, contact with fever patients and whether staying in red zone etc.• The same protocol must be applicable to all health care workers
Measures to follow after reaching home
• Leave footwear outside• Take shower and wear clean dress meant for home
• Sanitize hand, car keys, mobile• Clean hard surfaces at home with an effective disinfectant solution (e.g., 60% alcohol)
• Remove the mask and dispose of appropriately
• If reusable cloth mask—put it for wash and rinsing with soap water
ASI general recommendations for surgeons

Consensus Guidelines for Scheduling the Appointments

Sticking to the guidelines for “social distancing” will ensure safety. Patient scheduling is a critical task to mitigate the spread of the novel coronavirus and to protect the patients, their families, and workforce by avoiding unnecessary exposure. Every patient visiting hospital should be wearing a mask and must be encouraged to fill up a comprehensive online registration form or seek prior appointment regarding purpose of hospital visit and urgency, which should also include with brief history about cough/fever. Only one entry/exit point should be permitted to the hospital, and strict hygiene measures such as hand sanitization at the entrance must be made mandatory to the patients. To rule out a fever, a temperature check must be performed. Patients should be encouraged to visit the OPD alone (unless physically challenged), and it would be wise for patients to request their accompanying persons to stay in the car during his/her appointment. Minors must be allowed to be accompanied with only one parent/guardian to avoid crowding. Most importantly, it is crucial to ensure that patients inform the hospital right away regarding their travel history including of their household members and any signs of COVID-19 symptoms to reschedule the appointments in order to reduce the risk of contamination [6].

Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Cancer Patients

Cancer patients are more susceptible to COVID-19 infection because malignancy and anticancer therapy result in an immunosuppressive state [7]. There is evidence to suggest that cancer patients who contracted COVID-19 have more than triple the risk for severe health events including admission to the intensive care unit for invasive ventilation and rapid clinical deterioration [8]. The case fatality rate was 5.6%, higher than the overall reported case fatality (2.3%) from COVID-19 [9]. Cancer is a semi-emergency disease and its treatment is time-bound. There are 2 aspects to consider: Impact of COVID per se on cancer patients Impact of cancer on COVID patients Several experts in an international position paper have published some suggestions on the management of cancer patients in the COVID-19 era [10]. Surgical Society of Oncology (SSO) in affiliation with BSO and ISO has proposed three categories for cancer management as depicted in Table 2. There is rapid deterioration of general condition in COVID-affected cancer patients. First golden rule as a doctor is, “Do no harm.” Delay in treatment not only results in stage migration and a need for more radiotherapy/chemotherapy but also causes a significant economic impact. Therefore, decision-based stratification and triage by telecommunication [11] should be performed for the assessment of severity of the disease, co-existing comorbidities, and logistics. In case of treatment, a special format is needed to take consent for cancer patients specifying the risk involved to self and to the attended and outcome mortality difference. All MDTs for managing cancer patients should be organized on virtual telecommunication [12].
Table 2

SSO guidelines in alliance with BSO and ISO have proposed three categories as follows

Category ILow-risk patients with non-life threatening diseaseThe treatment can be postponed for 6 to 8 weeks after telecommunication
Category IIIntermediate-risk patients presenting with non-life threatening disease, but with a potential for further increase in morbidity and mortality if there is a delay in treatmentOral chemotherapy or short course radiotherapy can be given.
Category IIIHigh- risk patients, with life threatening diseaseSurgery is proposed
SSO guidelines in alliance with BSO and ISO have proposed three categories as follows Two studies published in China and Taiwan revealed that treatment delays in category II and category III were independent risk factors for increased cancer-related mortality. Delay of 3 months showed a drop of 1-year survival from 91 to 60% and decrease in 5-year survival from 71 to 38%.

Consensus Guidelines for Prioritization of Surgeries

In the face of pressures placed by the COVID-19 pandemic, elective surgeries have been restricted to alleviate the risk of transmission of the virus among patients and OR staff during aerosol-generating procedures and to preserve essential resources [13-15]. Few guidelines have been offered from surgical societies to help address details for different surgical considerations and prioritization [16, 17]; however, these guidelines provide only very broad rather than very specific recommendations. Facility’s resources, priorities, and patient needs must be taken into account, and prioritization process should be adjustable to meet local, regional, and national circumstances [18]. A surgical review committee, comprising of surgeon, anesthetist, and nursing personnel, is essential to provide defined, transparent, and responsive guidelines for the hospital. The expert panel recommended certain guidelines to support health service leaders by identifying key domains that should be covered in pandemic preparedness plans. While elective surgical and endoscopic cases remain on hold, emergency procedures cannot be postponed. These surgeries require careful planning and prioritizing to ensure proper treatment and safety measures are taken. Surgery must proceed regardless of knowing whether or not the patient is COVID-19 positive in emergency situations where surgeries that cannot wait for the results of a 12-h test. If a COVID-19 positive case is identified, it is vitally important to isolate them from new patients and other staff members. This may need to be followed up with referral to a COVID-19 hospital. Elective surgeries should be commenced once COVID-19 curve shows a continuous decline for 15 days. However, the expert consensus group recommends that surgeons follow local State & Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (MoHFW) guidelines in this regard.

Consensus Guidelines for Precautions to Be Taken During OPD Procedures and Visiting ER Rooms

Routine OPD work should be kept to a minimum. This will ensure less crowding and reduce transmission outside clinics. If avoidable, no relatives should be allowed and social distancing must be practiced within clinics and hospitals, with waiting-room chairs placed six feet apart, and all patients/attendants must wear a mask in the waiting area and should be instructed on cough and sneeze hygiene. Doctor’s clinics should be well ventilated and patients should maintain minimum six feet social distance except during physical examination. The doctor should wear a surgical mask, a face shield, and scrub hands with soap and water and use an alcohol-based disinfectant after interaction with each patient. In case of minor surgeries in the OPD, patients must be explained about individual risks of coming to the hospital, office, or surgery center for surgery during the pandemic. Essential minor surgeries must only be performed after screening and wearing adequate PPE preferably under local or regional anesthesia. There are many surgical procedures that are not considered emergency; hence, it is recommended to look for non-surgical options if available. While visiting patients in ER, initial consultation should be performed via phone with the casualty staff. History taking and asking for necessary investigations must be done on phone, and the patient is to be examined only after ensuring that he/she does need an emergency surgery. All precautions must be taken in order to minimize contact with the patient and relatives. Only one attendant is to be allowed with the patient. Social distancing norms are to be maintained as far as possible.

Consensus Guidelines for Personal Protective Equipment

PPE are designed to protect the health care workers by minimizing the exposure to biological agents [19]. Standard components of PPE kit include a face shield, goggles, mask, gloves, cover all/gowns, head cover, and shoe cover. However, all PPE are not similar. The Association of Spanish Surgeons [20], as well as the Centers for Disease Control in both the USA [21] and in China [22], specifically recommend use of N95 respirators without valves for surgeries with aerosol-generated procedures on COVID-19 patients. Australia’s Department of Health encourages N95 use for “high-level contact” with infected patients [23]. The World Health Organization (WHO) recently published PPE guidance and preventive measures such as hand rub with 70% alcohol before wearing and after removal of gloves, but did not specify that surgical procedures required N95 respirators [24, 25]. On contrary, MOHFW recommended two types of masks, triple-layer medical mask and N-95 respirator mask, depending upon the personnel and work environment [19]. However, it is encouraged that the healthcare workers must take preventive measures in strict accordance with the epidemic assessment level [26]. In addition, Table 3 summarizes recommendations from expert panel on the optimal use of PPE and its disposal for protecting surgeons while performing their duties.
Table 3

Recommendations for use of PPE for surgeons [19]

Sr. No.SettingActivityRiskRecommended PPERemark
A. Outpatient
  1Doctor chamberProvide information to patientMild risk▪ Triple-layer maskNo aerosol-generating procedure should be allowed
▪ Latex examination gloves
  2Pre-anesthetic check-up clinicPre-anesthetic check-up clinicModerate risk▪ N-95 mask* Only recommended when close examination of oral cavity/dentures is to be done
▪ Goggles
▪ Latex examination gloves
B. In-patient department (non-COVID hospital and non-COVID treatment areas of a hospital which have a COVID block)
  1Ward/individual roomsClinical managementMild risk

▪ Triple-layer medical mask

▪ Latex examination gloves

No aerosol-generating activity
  2ICU/critical careCritical care managementModerate risk▪ N-95 maskAerosol-generating activities performed.
▪ Goggles
▪ Nitrile examination gloves
Face shield, when a splash of body fluid is expected
+Face shield
  3Operation theaterPerforming surgery, administering general anesthesiaModerate risk▪ Triple-layer medical maskGoggles for personnel involved in aerosol-generating procedures
▪ Face shield (wherever feasible)
▪ Sterile latex gloves
+ Goggles
C. Emergency department (non-COVID)
  1EmergencyAttending emergency casesMild risk▪ Triple-layer medical maskNo aerosol-generating procedures are allowed
▪ Latex examination gloves
  2Emergency procedure roomAttending to severely ill patients while performing aerosol-generating procedureHigh risk▪ Full complement of PPE (N-95 mask, coverall, goggle, Nitrile examination gloves, shoe cover)

Single-use PPE should be disposed of in a red plastic bag, which is sealed and then sprayed with 1% hypochlorite solution. It should be labeled as HAZMAT and then disposed of as per biomedical waste disposal protocol

Recommendations for use of PPE for surgeons [19] ▪ Triple-layer medical mask ▪ Latex examination gloves Single-use PPE should be disposed of in a red plastic bag, which is sealed and then sprayed with 1% hypochlorite solution. It should be labeled as HAZMAT and then disposed of as per biomedical waste disposal protocol

Consensus Guidelines on Classifying Urgent Category Surgeries and Adapting Surgical Techniques to Reduce Exposure Risks

During the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, surgeries were classified into various tiers depending on the urgency of surgery. Most elective surgeries like hernia (up to tier 2b) were advised to be postponed. For most cancer surgeries (tier 3a and 3b), postponement is not advised by ACS at the moment though it may subject to change [27]. On contrary, aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) are procedures performed on patients that are more likely to generate higher concentrations of infectious respiratory aerosols than coughing, sneezing, talking, or breathing. The evidence on the possibility of patient to surgeon transmission of SARS-CoV-2 during droplet- and aerosol-generating procedures is still sparse [28]. However, it is important to recognize that open surgical procedures can generate plume with similar devices. Previous evidence identified the viral and bacterial aerosols in surgical plumes in both laparoscopic and open procedures [29-32]. Smoke evacuation device usage in line with pre-existing OR guidelines may reduce aerosol exposure in both open and laparoscopic procedures [33]. Although laparoscopy is found to result in decreased length of stay and faster recovery as compared with open surgery, it is unclear about the extent of surgeon risk of exposure to aerosolized viral particles during laparoscopy as discussed earlier. Recommendations from CDC suggest the use of enhanced respiratory PPE greater than N95 level for certain aerosol-generating procedures [34]. The American College of Surgeons stated an insufficient evidence to recommend for/against an open versus laparoscopy approach. SAGES guidelines recommend the use of filters for the released CO2 during laparoscopy and robotic surgery. In Table 4, expert panel provided reasonable recommendations for the list of AGPs, current surgical practices, and postponement of surgeries in group of patients. Table 5 shows comparison of different risk factors across open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted surgery under COVID-19 circumstances.
Table 4

Recommendations on surgical practices and postponement of surgeries

List of aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs)
• Airway surgeries (e.g., ENT, thoracic, transsphenoidal surgeries)• Bronchoscopy, sputum induction
• Intubation and extubation• Open suctioning of tracheostomy, tracheostomy change
• Chest compressions• Upper endoscopy (including transesophageal echocardiogram) and lower endoscopy
• Nebulization• Chest physical therapy
• High flow oxygen, including nasal cannula, at > 15 L• Venturi mask with cool aerosol humidification
• Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (e.g., CPAP, BIPAP), oscillatory ventilation, manual ventilation (e.g., manual bag-mask ventilation before intubation), disconnecting patient from ventilator• Mechanical In-exsufflator (MIE)
• Ventilator circuit manipulation
Group of patients on whom surgeries can be postponed for 6–7 days
• Irreducible hernia without obstruction• Subacute intestinal obstruction
• Amputation of dry gangrene• Acute uncomplicated appendicitis
• Bleeding hemorrhoid• Acute cholecystitis
Lap or open for urgent category surgeries
• Multi-faceted approach: proper room air filtration and ventilation, appropriate PPE, smoke evacuation devices with suction and filtration system, minimal use of cautery and energy devices• Proper decision can be taken on procedure to procedure basis
• Pragmatic suggestions for filtration:
▪ Laparoscopic surgery require an ultra-low particulate filtration (ULPA)
• Procedures which create aerosolization should be avoided.▪ Use smoke evacuator when electrocautery/energy devices are used
• Use of multifunctional instruments to minimize instruments exchanges via trocars▪ Use of smoke evacuators such as Megadyne, Megavac Plus, and similar devices are preferred
• Procedures which require regional anesthesia are preferred.▪ Use of low pneumoperitoneum pressures is recommended when possible
• In small setting open surgery may be better than laparoscopy▪ Avoid venting of ports once placed if possible
• The advantages of laparoscopic surgery (short hospitalization) should be weighed against the risk of aerosolization
Table 5

Risk comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted surgery under COVID-19 circumstances [35, 36]

ParticularsOpen surgeryLaparoscopy surgeryRobot-assisted surgery
Health personnelUsually 3 bedside staffUsually 3 bedside staffUsually 1 bedside staff, 1 console staff (remote)
Length of stay (LOS)LongerShortShort
Aerosol generationLess aerosol formation, unconfined dispersion, unfiltered (no data on COVID-19 in aerosols and risk)Intraabdominal dispersion, limited by filters or locks (no data on COVID-19 in aerosols and risk)Intraabdominal dispersion, limited by filters or locks (no data on COVID-19 in aerosols and risk)
SmokeMaximal exposureConfined, filteredConfined, filtered
Blood, Bio-fluidsAdditional blood loss, Continuous exposureHardly if any blood loss, exposure at limited intervalsHardly if any blood loss, exposure at limited intervals
Abdominal pressure (mmHg)010–15< 10
Perioperative cleaning of instrumentsLarge number of instruments, heavy blood contaminationLimited number of instruments, less blood contaminationLarge surface of robot, limited number of instruments, less blood contamination
Recommendations on surgical practices and postponement of surgeries Risk comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted surgery under COVID-19 circumstances [35, 36]

Consensus Guidelines on Organizing Emergency Surgery, COVID Testing, and Post-operative Care

Healthcare centers must organize dedicated protocols and workforce training. Usage of surgical appliances and staff must be well contemplated and balanced [37]. Surgical procedures on all suspected COVID-19 patient should be postponed wherever possible until infection clearance is confirmed. However, a fundamental issue in emergency surgery is to consider every patient as COVID positive in order to minimize infection spread and usual precautions must be taken. Before discharge, COVID-19 test is not recommended for patients, as per current Govt. guidelines. In Table 6, the expert panel outlines recommended clinical pathways during life-threatening emergencies, consensus on testing patients before discharge, and minimizing the contamination risk to the patients postoperatively.
Table 6

Recommendations on emergency surgery, COVID testing, and post-operative care

Organizing emergency surgery
• Standard precautions, in a given setting, are far more important than universal testing.• Surgeries during pandemic can be divided into 5 categories:
• For instance, a positive report is always positive but a negative report has 30% chance of being false negative.- Emergency surgery < 1 h
- Urgent surgery < 24 h
- Urgent elective surgery ~ 2 weeks
• Given the volumes of cases expected and the infrastructure available, precautionary measures may not exist at large number of the lefts in coming months. Hence in an ideal situation, a crucial approach is to keep the services operational while maintaining safety precautions.- Elective Essential 1–3 months
- Elective(discretionary) >3 months
• The first two categories need to be taken up even without COVID report being available.
• The surgery should be performed in separate identified COVID OT with all precautions.
• An exposure history and history of respiratory symptoms forms a vital part of initial assessment of the patient to evaluate possibility of COVID.• DO NOT hesitate to transfer patient to COVID-designated facility
Post-operative care
• Patients to be kept in separate COVID suspect room/ward and all precautions to be taken• If positive, the patient should be kept in isolation for at least 48 h if not on ventilator.
• RT PCR needs to be performed if symptoms develop• Full protection as per MOH guidelines
Testing patients before discharge
• If possible, get a test done before taking up for surgery and the report may become available before or after surgery. However if not sent before surgery, do it as early as possible after surgery.• If patient is known COVID positive, any surgical procedure which can be avoided, must be avoided.
• It is important to do the test as patients who are COVID positive and are taken up for elective or emergency surgery are at much higher risk of postoperative mortality of up to 20%. Hence, it is important to document it beforehand.• Refer to COVID-designated hospital if positive
Recommendations on emergency surgery, COVID testing, and post-operative care

Consensus Guidelines on Diagnosis/Treatment of Post-op COVID Complications, and Surgical Recommendations on COVID-Recovered Patients

Latest evidence suggests that surgery may accelerate and aggravate disease progression of COVID-19 [14]. All patients developed COVID-19 pneumonia shortly after surgery with abnormal findings on chest computed tomographic scans. Considering the evidence available, expert panel looked into these concerns and following recommendations were outlined to address these challenges as depicted in Table 7.
Table 7

Post-op COVID complications and surgical recommendations

Diagnosis/treatment of post-op COVID complications
Symptoms▪ Fever
▪ Sore throat
▪ Respiratory difficulty
Signs▪ Tachypnea
▪ Tachycardia
▪ Hypertension
▪ Bilateral chest creps/wheeze, air hunger disproportionate to signs
Investigations▪ CXR–ground glass–serial worsening.
▪ HRCT–bilateral ground glass
▪ ABG–hypoxia
Treatment (ICU monitoring and supportive treatment in consultation with intensivist)▪ O2
▪ Ventilation
▪ HCQ
▪ Steroids
▪ Anti-inflammatory
Operating on COVID-recovered patients
• Two consecutive swabs are negative in a span of 7/14 days• The grade of severity of COVID-19 in these patients have to be assessed, which depends whether they were managed in the ward or by quarantine, or in the ICU.
• Antibody spot test—IgM is negative
• Antibody spot test—IgG is positive• The lung changes are reported to be reversible
Post-op COVID complications and surgical recommendations

Consensus Guidelines on Pre-op Screening of COVID-19

Extending the logic of COVID-19 testing to all admitted patients is reasonable given the cost concerns, and the delay in patient management is taken care of. Currently, there are 3 options available for pre-op screening and the expert panel discussed about availability of each options and the considerations are summarized in Table 8:
Table 8

Recommendations for Pre-Op screening of COVID-19

RT-PCR• RT PCR (though with false negativities reported) still remains the only investigation to guide a surgeon.
• RT-PCR is positive within 5 days with a sensitivity of 71% if done within 72 h.
• The test will be negative during incubation period but the patient can still be infective.
• There is reported 10% negativity due to procedural errors.
• The reported shortage of kits coupled with its consumption for pre-op screening at the expense of diagnosis, will make such practice an unethical one.
• Imbalance between availability of these kits between government and private hospitals can raise an alarm.
• Value of resorting to RT PCR after 1 week of infection is minimal.
• A negative RT-PCR hence gives ONLY a false sense of security.
Antibody spot rapid test• Antibody spot rapid test can be done only in the 2nd week and has a sensitivity of 81%.
HRCT• A HRCT chest may be option to suspect impending COVID status and take post-operative measures to decrease morbidity and mortality. A study on 1100 patients was done in Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, China, and the paper was published in the journal of Radiological society of North America, on Feb 26, 2020.
• HRCT lung—is more sensitive and outperformed lab tests in the diagnosis of Novel COVID-19. It is a more reliable, practical, and rapid method of diagnosis.
• In patients with negative RT-PCR, 75% were found to have positive HRCT chest finding, and among the 75% of HRCT positive patients, it was further found that 48% were high risk, and 33% belonged to low risk.
• The advantages of HRCT include:
 It is a plain CT
 NPO not required
 Contrast not required
 Results available immediately
Recommendations for Pre-Op screening of COVID-19

Consensus Guidelines on Ideal OT Specifications and Practicalities

Ideal operation theater specifications are still under consideration. One important recommendation is negative-pressure operation room. The use of stapler is preferred as it reduces operation time coupled with other better clinical outcomes [38]. In Indian set-ups, there are three types of hospitals: Small-size nursing home set-up with single operation room Mid/large-size private institutes with multiple operating rooms (in one place or at different places) Mid/large-size public-funded institutes with multiple operating rooms (in one place or at different places) Sudden changes incorporated to ideal operation rooms will not be possible in all the above set-ups. In cases of multi-operation room set-up, a dedicated operating room may be ear-marked. In the post lock-down period, it is advisable to have dedicated COVID theaters. Have separate donning and doffing area. However, the suggestion at present would be:

Key Recommendations on Additional Measures

The risk of transmission of COVID-19 through transfusion of blood and components is now only theoretical and likely minimal [39]. There is no restriction on blood transfusion. Any actions taken to mitigate risk are therefore precautionary. Guidelines issued by National Blood Transfusion Council, MoHFW, and standard laboratory biosafety practices, based on national or international guidelines, should be followed in all circumstances. With regard to medico-legal aspects, there is no law on COVID morbidity and mortality. Hence, one has to be guided by the notification issued by the MoHFW. A separate consent explaining morbidity and mortality of surgery is advisable. Costs get escalated with use of PPE for all involved in surgery and postoperative care. It is estimated to be over Rs. 15,000 per case. Agencies like ESI/CGHS/ECHS and even insurance need to be informed and directed through the MoHFW to exclude the cost from the package for operations agreed upon. Surgeons above 65 years are advised to avoid getting into health care activities during the COVID era. The proposed blanket insurance for healthcare workers by central government will not become applicable to such people in case the infection is proved to be from clinical practice. COVID-19 will not disappear anytime soon and will be part and parcel of our lives in the foreseeable future. And therefore, any travel or on-site meetings will pose a definite risk to the healthcare personnel. The governmental policy (updated from time to time) would guide the future with specific regard to conducting/attending such meetings. ASI’s flagship annual Regional Refresher Courses and the newly introduced National Skills Enhancement Programme for postgraduates (NSEP PGs) starting in June 2020 ushers in a new era in the Association’s e-learning teaching schedule. Revised ICMR guidelines recommend hydroxychloroquine as chemoprophylaxis for all asymptomatic healthcare workers involved in containment and treatment of COVID-19 with dosage of 400 mg twice a day on day 1, followed by 400 mg once weekly for next 7 weeks, to be taken with meals. It further recommends use beyond 8 weeks on weekly dosage with strict monitoring of clinical and ECG parameters, and one ECG should be done anytime during the course of prophylaxis [40].

Conclusion

In a very short period, health care systems and society have been tremendously impacted by COVID-19. It appears that the fight against this pandemic disease will be long-lasting. The proposed mitigation strategies highlighted by this expert panel underscore the urgent need for revised decision-making and appropriate resource allocation, which would enable the broader healthcare community to prevail during these difficult times. It is important to have robust mechanisms, strategies, and protocols in place for infection prevention, screening/triage, use of PPE, modification of infrastructure, and processes, while taking utmost care to protect the healthcare professionals, all along. These consensus guidelines would hopefully enable ASI members in performing their professional responsibilities without being the pivot of disease transmission. Most importantly, it is also crucial to evaluate the effectiveness of adapted strategies more often for longer-term health system capacity building. This advisory was prepared based upon information available up to 26 May 2020. COVID-19 is a fast-changing scenario and practice guidelines may change accordingly. Looking up the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) and MOHFW websites from time to time is essential to get the latest and up to date information.
➢ Stagger the operations➢ No visitors or observers in OT
➢ Minimum HCWs in operating room during anesthesia➢ Controlled smoke (aerosol) evacuations—suggestions are still dynamic
➢ Complete PPE protection during surgery➢ Minimum HCWs during reversal from anesthesia
➢ Use of minimal energy source➢ Sanitize the room with 1% hypochlorite solution (every equipment used)
➢ Surgeons and personnel not needed for intubation should remain outside the operating room until anesthesia induction and intubation are completed for patients with or suspected of having COVID-19 infection➢ Keep the doors of OT open for sufficient time between cases (1 h between cases)
  16 in total

1.  Compliance with surgical smoke evacuation guidelines: implications for practice.

Authors:  Kay Ball
Journal:  ORNAC J       Date:  2012-03

2.  Is it time for a more systematic approach to the hazards of surgical smoke?: reconsidering the evidence.

Authors:  Gary Mellor; Marie Hutchinson
Journal:  Workplace Health Saf       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 1.413

3.  Can Efficient Smoke Evacuation Limit Aerosolization of Bacteria?

Authors:  Leonard Schultz
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 0.676

Review 4.  Preparing for a COVID-19 pandemic: a review of operating room outbreak response measures in a large tertiary hospital in Singapore.

Authors:  Jolin Wong; Qing Yuan Goh; Zihui Tan; Sui An Lie; Yoong Chuan Tay; Shin Yi Ng; Chai Rick Soh
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 6.713

Review 5.  Virus transmission during orthopedic surgery on patients with COVID-19 - a brief narrative review.

Authors:  Trude Basso; Håvard Dale; Håkon Langvatn; Greger Lønne; Inge Skråmm; Marianne Westberg; Tina S Wik; Eivind Witsø
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 6.  Society of Robotic Surgery review: recommendations regarding the risk of COVID-19 transmission during minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  James Porter; Elliot Blau; Farid Gharagozloo; Martin Martino; Robert Cerfolio; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Aileen Caceres; Ketan Badani; Sam Bhayani; Justin Collins; Rafael Coelho; Bernard Rocco; Peter Wiklund; Senthil Nathan; Eduardo Parra-Davila; Carlos Ortiz-Ortiz; Kris Maes; Prokar Dasgupta; Vipul Patel
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 5.969

Review 7.  A Practical Approach to the Management of Cancer Patients During the Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic: An International Collaborative Group.

Authors:  Humaid O Al-Shamsi; Waleed Alhazzani; Ahmad Alhuraiji; Eric A Coomes; Roy F Chemaly; Meshari Almuhanna; Robert A Wolff; Nuhad K Ibrahim; Melvin L K Chua; Sebastien J Hotte; Brandon M Meyers; Tarek Elfiki; Giuseppe Curigliano; Cathy Eng; Axel Grothey; Conghua Xie
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-04-27

8.  Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing surgeries during the incubation period of COVID-19 infection.

Authors:  Shaoqing Lei; Fang Jiang; Wating Su; Chang Chen; Jingli Chen; Wei Mei; Li-Ying Zhan; Yifan Jia; Liangqing Zhang; Danyong Liu; Zhong-Yuan Xia; Zhengyuan Xia
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-04-05

9.  The Need for Prioritizing Cancer Surgeries Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Arvind Krishnamurthy; Kodaganur S Gopinath
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-04-29

10.  COVID-19 Outbreak and Surgical Practice: Unexpected Fatality in Perioperative Period.

Authors:  Ali Aminian; Saeed Safari; Abdolali Razeghian-Jahromi; Mohammad Ghorbani; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 13.787

View more
  8 in total

1.  Surgical Consent during COVID Pandemic: COVID Times-Surgical Consent Checklist.

Authors:  Toney Jose; Arya Joy
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Covid-19 vaccine, acceptance, and concern of safety from public perspective in the state of Odisha, India.

Authors:  Dibya Sundar Panda; Ranjan Kumar Giri; Anil Kumar Nagarajappa; Sakeenabi Basha
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Consistency of global recommendations regarding open versus laparoscopic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.

Authors:  Susan Jacob; Ahmer Hameed; Vincent Lam; Tony Cy Pang
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.025

4.  ASI's Consensus Guidelines: ABCs of What to Do and What Not During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Kaushik Bhattacharya; Neela Bhattacharya
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 5.  Rapid Scoping Review of Laparoscopic Surgery Guidelines During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Appraisal Using a Simple Quality Appraisal Tool "EMERGE".

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar Yadav; Vikesh Agrawal; Pawan Agarwal; Dhananjaya Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 0.437

Review 6.  Strategies for Optimizing the Use of PPE During Surgery in COVID-19 Pandemic: Rapid Scoping Review of Guidelines.

Authors:  Vikesh Agrawal; Sanjay Kumar Yadav; Pawan Agarwal; Dhananjaya Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 0.656

7.  Surgical Diseases Management during COVID-19 Crisis at a Tertiary Care Hospital of India: Our Institutional Strategy.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar Singh; Amit Gupta; Harindra Sandhu; Rishit Mani; Jyoti Sharma; Praveen Kumar; Deepak Rajput; Navin Kumar; Farhanul Huda; Som Prakas Basu; Bina Ravi; Ravi Kant
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2021-12-28

8.  Knowledge about the effects of electrosurgery smoke among operating room nurses during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Armin Fereidouni; Fatemeh Vizeshfar; Maryam Ghanavati; Reza Tavakol
Journal:  Perioper Care Oper Room Manag       Date:  2021-06-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.