Literature DB >> 3283661

Measurement of the analgesic effects of aspirin with a new experimental algesimetric procedure.

C Forster1, F Anton, P W Reeh, E Weber, H O Handwerker.   

Abstract

Using controlled long lasting noxious squeeze stimuli applied to the interdigital webs we have tried to develop experimental methods allowing us to measure the effects of peripherally acting analgesics. In the present double-blind cross-over study with 12 subjects we tested the effects of aspirin (1000 and 1500 mg) vs. placebo on subjective pain induced by alternately applied 12 N (Newton) and 8 N stimuli. During the sessions blood samples were taken in regular intervals to measure acetylsalicylate (ASA)- and salicylate (SA)-plasma levels. Analyses of variance were computed with several psychophysical parameters. Both the '12 N' and the '8 N' ratings discriminated between placebo and aspirin, however, only the ratings obtained from the stronger stimuli discriminated between two doses of aspirin. Subsequently we computed analyses of covariance with the ASA- and SA-plasma levels as covariates. Significant (negative) correlations of pain ratings and SA-plasma levels were found for the high dose of aspirin, but there were no significant correlations of ASA levels and ratings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3283661     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90070-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  11 in total

1.  [Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): Antirheumatic, anti-pyretic or analgesic drugs?].

Authors:  K Brune
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 2.  Is aspirin safe for patients with heart failure?

Authors:  J G Cleland; C J Bulpitt; R H Falk; I N Findlay; C M Oakley; G Murray; P A Poole-Wilson; C R Prentice; G C Sutton
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-09

3.  Comparative pharmacokinetics of Aspegic 1000 mg i.v. versus 1000 mg i.m. thrice daily.

Authors:  B Nia; J M Vergnaud
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.441

4.  Tonic versus phasic pain: dose-related effects of ketoprofen.

Authors:  T Hummel; H Huber; S Menzel; G Kobal
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Sensitivity of repeated interdigital web pinching to detect antinociceptive effects of ibuprofen.

Authors:  J W Growcott; A Stone; R Beise; H Stammer; W Tetzloff; C Demey
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Effects of pentazocine and acetylsalicylic acid on pain-rating, pain-related evoked potentials and vigilance in relationship to pharmacokinetic parameters.

Authors:  G Kobal; C Hummel; B Nuernberg; K Brune
Journal:  Agents Actions       Date:  1990-03

7.  Prolonged noxious mechanical stimulation of the rat's tail: responses and encoding properties of dorsal horn neurones.

Authors:  F Cervero; H O Handwerker; J M Laird
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Differential effects of dipyrone, ibuprofen, and paracetamol on experimentally induced pain in man.

Authors:  C Forster; W Magerl; A Beck; G Geisslinger; T Gall; K Brune; H O Handwerker
Journal:  Agents Actions       Date:  1992-01

Review 9.  Assessing efficacy of non-opioid analgesics in experimental pain models in healthy volunteers: an updated review.

Authors:  Camilla Staahl; Anne Estrup Olesen; Trine Andresen; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Analgesic efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in experimental pain in humans.

Authors:  J S Walker; J F Arroyo; T Nguyen; R O Day
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.