A facile approach for the preparation of polycarbonate nanofiber mat with filtration capability.

The present day environmental issues demand a lot from scientists and engineers to keep the planet earth safe for its habitats. There were lot of attempts for developing efficient air and liquid filters as the demand increases with an utmost concern of present environmental situations. Thanks to its large surface area to volume ratio, polymer nanofibers and composites are found to be good substitute for conventional filters. As per the research and analysis data, filtration efficiency increases proportional to the reduction of the average diameter of the fibers. In this study, the most efficient electrospinning technology was adopted to prepare polycarbonate (PC) nanofiber mat which yields a very fine surface morphology. There are earlier researches and associated data available about the preparation of PC nanofibers but with average fiber diameter above 1000 nm. In this study, a systematic methodology was instigated to generate PC nanofibers with least average diameter of 90 nm without using any surfactants or salts. The most suitable solvents, solvent proportion, polymer concentration and electrospinning conditions for the formation of the fiber mat are discussed elaborately. PC fiber mat of least average diameter was proved to be highly efficient for particulate matter adsorption using a dust sampling analyzer. © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.

Introduction

Air pollution is considered as a great curse of twenty-first century as a result of modernization of all levels of present day life. The air quality of New Delhi, India in November 2019 has been created an emergency situation with thousands of people under threat (Fig. 1). The central pollution control board (CPCB) estimated the national capital’s average air quality index (AQI) on 3rd Sunday 4.00 pm as 494. The World Health Organization (WHO) perceived air pollution as a dangerous situation that causes premature deaths around seven million every year worldwide. Out of this 2.6 million premature deaths were reported to be of indoor air pollution. Particulate matter in air is the major reason for indoor air pollution and sources include households, agriculture, industry, automobiles, burning of waste and power plants [1-3]. The victims of indoor air pollution are generally children and women. The ramifications and deaths were attributed to be a result of diseases like stroke, pneumonia, pulmonary diseases, lung cancer and heart disease. It was estimated that more than 80% of the world population are not in a position to access modern technologies. They are still in a situation to depend on inefficient energy sources which again worsen the burning situation.

Fig. 1

Some of the air polluted regions of Delhi in 2019 November (a–c)

To use nanofibrous mat as filters for bio-aerosols is a serious concern among scientists particularly during the present outbreak of Covid-19 virus. The potential pandemic has created an emergency situation particularly in the global health care sector. According to WHO the total number of infected COVID 19 cases as on 27th April 2020 were 28,83,603 and killed 1,98,842 people. The Chinese center for disease control and prevention reported that the size of Covid-19 virus is approximately 100 nm. Various types of face masks used for precaution against the virus cannot assure complete protection. WHO has recently given an interim guidance on the use of face masks which emphasized on the standard test methods to ensure the filtration efficiency, fluid penetration resistance and breathability. Virus, allergens, pollens, bacteria and fungus are biological aerosols that result adverse health effects in humans [4]. In this worst scenario, various remediation strategies and measures were being adopted to control air pollution. Microorganisms like viruses usually possess electronegative surface due to the presence of phosphate and carboxyl groups [5]. Most of the nanofibers possess positive charge and that facilitate the effective filtration of viruses and other bio-aerosols [6, 7]. There were various reports on the preparation of nanofiber filter masks and different filters with improved capacity to filter microbiological objects like viruses [8]. Thinner nanofiber membranes with small pores were made to improve the bacterial retention capacity of sterilizing grade filters [9].

Aerosol filters are the most commonly used technique for purifying and sampling of air. There is a growing demand for innovative and efficient scavenging system for the immediate removal of pollutants contaminated in air. Fibrous filters were found to be highly promising and more efficient than conventional air filters [10-12]. The depth filtration capability of fibrous filters is the resultant of diffusion, inertial impaction, interception and electrostatic interaction [13].

Superior filtration efficiency of ultrafine polymer fiber membranes has been recapitulated as a result of high surface-to-volume ratio, high porosity, microscale interstitial space and interconnectivity [14, 15]. In filtration field the term nanofiber is attributed to fibers of average diameter well below 500 nm [16]. There were numerous reports on the diverse applications of nanofiber filter media mainly focused on contaminants and environment. The effective size exclusion nanofibrous mats are well suited for air and water particulate matter removal [17, 18].

Most accepted and well-known method for generating nanofibrous scaffolds for filtration applications is electrospinning. The wide acceptance of this approach is due to its simplicity, cost-effectiveness and the narrow distribution of fiber diameter by which the filtration can be properly controlled [19-21]. Suitable polymer concentration, solvent system, solvent ratio and other spinning parameters are essential for fabricating fibers with least average diameter. The polymer solution taken in the spinneret ejected out of the needle tip by the application of a high electric potential. Both electrical and mechanical forces make use for the ejection of polymer jet from the needle tip. The electrically charged drop at the needle tip assumes a cone shape which is called Taylor cone. This phenomenon is observed when the force due to electric field outweigh the force of surface tension. At this critical electric voltage, the polymer jet starts ejected from the Taylor cone tip. This then undergoes a bending instability and the main jet splits into number of mini jets. Solvent evaporation occurs from the polymer jets during the flight towards the oppositely charged collector [22]. During the movement towards the collector the mini-jets suffer strong competition between different instabilities. This include the whipping instability, Rayleigh instability and axisymmetric conducting mode instability. These instabilities vary depending on the electrospinning and fluid parameters. So optimizing the solution properties and other spinning parameters are crucial for the final morphology of the fibers [23, 24].

The flow of polymer jet from the nozzle tip to the collector undergoes variation in current under an applied voltage. This depends on the charge carrying capacity of the polymer solution. There will be a change of shape of polymer jet at the nozzle tip by the increase of the applied electric current. This is considered as a major factor that determines the final surface morphology of the fiber [25]. There are various reports on the deviation of the average diameter of the electrospun fibers by the variation of the applied electric current. The minimum electron volt required for the deposition of ultrafine fibers during electrospinning is directly related to the needle tip-collection plate distance [26-29]. Another important factor that influences the fiber morphology is the distance between the tip of the needle and the collecting plate. Depending upon the volatility of the solvent, solvent proportion, fiber deposition time, instability interval, evaporation rate and the nature of the polymer, fibers with different morphology particularly porous, beaded, non-uniform or fibers with varying diameters were observed [27, 29]. Adjusting a proper polymer solution flow rate is important as it remarkably affects the transfer of the material and also the velocity of the jet during electrospinning. This will subsequently influence the pore diameter and fiber diameter of the nanofibers deposited [29]. The surface tension and viscosity of the polymer solution jet varies with concentration of the polymer solution [25]. An optimum concentration is essential for the fabrication of uniform and defect free ultrafine fibers. There were various reports on the occurrence of electrospraying process at very low concentrated solutions. Electrospinning was reported to be not convenient at very high concentration which results fibers with large average diameter [30-32]. Solvents play an important role during the entire process of fiber formation from solution preparation to fiber collection. The capacity to dissolve the polymer, its volatility, boiling point and charge carrying capacity have combined effect over electrospinning. The vapor pressure and the dipole moment of the solvent determine the rate of evaporation and conductivity of the polymer jet. The high dipole moment of the solvent influences the surface morphology and average diameter of the fibers [33-36].

Among a large number of promising engineering materials polycarbonate (PC) garnishes a key position with its unique mechanical and physical properties. It is a material with excellent heat resistance, resistance to acid and alkali, impact strength, rigidity, toughness and stable performance in high temperature atmospheres [34, 37]. The above mentioned properties of PC enable it to be a suitable material for filtration, bio-medical, electronics, protective clothing and many other modern applications [38]. Only limited number of studies were done to prepare micro and nano sized fibers of PC by electrospinning technology. Various electrospinning parameters and their influence on the final morphology of the polymer fibers were also reported [39-45]. As it is an amorphous material, it has the ability to possess high residual charge by electrospinning. Preparation of antimicrobial filtration membranes of PC were reported by electrospinning with the addition of quaternary ammonium salt into the polymer matrix [46]. Ultrafine PC fibers were prepared by the addition of hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) with average pore size 504 nm and average diameter of 319 nm with high efficiency [47].

The present study systematically established the preparation of ultrafine beadless PC fibers with average diameter of 90 nm. Fixed concentration of PC solutions were electrospun by varying the solvent proportion, flow rate, applied voltage and distance between the needle tip and the collecting plate (working distance). The surface morphology and average diameter of the generated fibers were thoroughly investigated. The uniform bead free fiber mat with least average diameter was further examined for its filtration ability.

Experimental

Materials and methods

Polycarbonate (PC) pellets were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, USA with molecular weight 45,000 g/mol. Analytical grade solvents dichloromethane (DCM) and N, N dimethyl formamide (DMF) were procured from Merck India Ltd.

Electrospinning

In our previous published papers different concentrations of PC in the solvents DCM and DMF were electrospun under constant spinning parameters [32, 34]. A 14 w/v% PC solution in 1:1 DCM–DMF mixture was found to generate beadless fibers with least average diameter of 90 nm. So in the present work the PC concentration was kept constant as 14 w/v% and varied the solvent ratio and other spinning parameters. Electrospinning of PC solutions were done with the help of Espin Nano electrospinning machine supplied by PECO Chennai. The process of formation of fiber mat during electrospinning of PC solution is shown in Fig. 2a. The solution was taken in a 5 mL syringe with needle 0.6 × 25 mm2 dimension and connected to one of the electrode. The other terminal was connected to the fiber collecting metal plate. Then voltages of 10, 20 and 30 kV were separately applied to 14 w/v% PC solutions keeping all other parameters constant. Similarly electrospinning continued by varying the flow rate as 0.5, 1 and 1.5 mL/h. Then the process was repeated by setting the needle tip-collection plate distance as 10, 15 and 20 cm. Five different proportions of solvents were experimented with values 1:1, 3:2, 7:3, 4:1 and 9:1. The conductivities and viscosities of these solutions were measured with the help of Eutech instruments Cyberscan PC 300 model conductivity meter and Brookfield digital viscometer CAP 2000 with spindle number 1 respectively. The collected fibers were characterized for surface morphology with the help of TESCAU VEGA 3 SBH scanning electron microscope (SEM). The water contact angles of the prepared fibers were measured using DMS 401 contact angle instrument.

Fig. 2

a Formation of PC fiber mat during electrospinning. b Respirable dust sampler for particulate matter analysis

Respirable dust sampler

The filtration property of PC nanofiber mat produced by electrospinning process was measured with the help of Envirotech APM 460BL Respirale dust sampler (Fig. 2b).

The indoor air pollutants were collected from the kitchen premises of a household on a busy time schedule between 8 am and 12 noon for two consecutive days. A 20.3 × 25.4 cm (1 × 8 in.) glass fiber filter paper was used to collect particles. The adsorbed respirable suspended particulate matter (RSPM) will spread over about 18 × 23 cm area of the glass fiber filter paper after exposure. Loosen the face plate wing nuts and remove the face plate of instrument. Remove the weighed filter paper from its jacket and center it on the support screen with the rough side of the paper facing upward. Replace the face plate and tighten the wing nuts. Set the timer for 2 h for continuous sampling. After sampling was completed, note the final flow rate by removing the wing nuts. Folded the filter in half-length by handling it along its edge with the exposed side inward. Weighed the filter paper after proper drying. Weighed another glass fiber filter paper and placed inside the chamber as discussed above. Then the prepared PC fiber mat was kept over the gap on one side of the instrument which is in between the glass fiber paper and the external sucking hood. Tighten all the screws ensuring the suction of the particulate matter properly through the fiber mat. The experiment was conducted by maintaining the time and atmosphere same as the first one. The process was repeated with fresh glass papers and fiber mat for the next 2 h. The experiment was also done by using PC fiber mats with different thickness.

The histograms of the nanofibers were prepared by using a custom code Image J software. A suitable SEM image was selected, set the scale and selected a scanned area of the image. Along with the histograms average fiber diameter and standard deviation values will be available. The standard deviation values will provide an insight into the variation of fiber uniformity. The bead density of the fibers was also calculated using this software.

Results and discussion

Polycarbonate (PC) was perfectly soluble in the solvent DCM but slightly soluble in DMF. Fibers with least average diameter was obtained for 14 w/v% PC in 1:1 DCM–DMF mixture out of a series of different concentrations experimented [34]. The average fiber diameter increases with increase in the concentration of the polymer solution. This is attributed to the increase in viscosity that can strongly opposes the bending instability of the polymer jet [48]. To confirm whether this PC concentration could produce beadless uniform fibers with least average diameter by the variation of solvent proportion, flow rate, applied potential and needle tip-collector distance, systematic investigations were performed.

Variation in solvent proportion

Different proportions of the solvents DCM and DMF were examined at constant PC concentration and spinning parameters. Both solvents in PC solutions have their own active role to modify and balance various forces acting on the polymer jet during its flight to the target [42]. Various spinning parameters applied for different solvent proportions during electrospining are provided in Table 2. The SEM images of the fibers obtained by the electrospinning of 14 w/v% of PC in different solvent proportions are given in Fig. 3.

Table 2

Solution and spinning parameters used for the preparation of PC nanofibers with the corresponding fiber average diameter and contact angle values

Sl.no.	Concentration of PC solution (w/v%)	Solvent ratio	Flow rate (mL/h)	Working Distance (cm)	Voltage (kV)	Average diameter (nm)	Contact angle (°)
1	14	1:1	0.5	15	20	90	132.8
2	14	3:2	0.5	15	20	388	128.7
3	14	7:3	0.5	15	20	583	119.0
4	14	4:1	0.5	15	20	752	117.7
5	14	9:1	0.5	15	20	816	109.4
6	14	1:1	1.0	15	20	178	121.4
7	14	1:1	1.5	15	20	236	114.3
8	14	1:1	0.5	15	10	137	130.9
9	14	1:1	0.5	15	30	382	124.2
10	14	1:1	0.5	10	20	136	130.4
11	14	1:1	0.5	20	20	238	123.1

Fig. 3

SEM images of fibers of 14 w/v% of PC in various proportions of DCM–DMF mixture a 1:1, b 3:2, c 7:3, d 4:1 and e 9:1

Beadless fibers with slight variation in uniformity and average diameter were obtained from all the solvent proportions. 14 w/v% of PC in 1:1 DCM–DMF mixture has generated uniform fibers with an average diameter of 90 nm (Fig. 3a). For 3:2 solvent mixture beadless PC fibers with an average diameter of 388 nm were obtained. The average fiber diameter is 583 nm for PC in 7:3 DCM–DMF solvent system. Non-uniform but beadless fibers with average diameter 752 nm can be observed for PC in a 4:1 solvent mixture. For a 9:1 solvent system non-uniform fibers with average diameter of 816 nm and beadless morphology were obtained. The histograms drawn with the help of Image J software can easily predict the variation of uniformity of the electrospun fibers (Fig. 4). The corresponding standard deviation (SD) values of average diameters are also provided along with the histograms.

Fig. 4

Histograms of the fibers of 14 w/v% of PC in various proportions of DCM–DMF mixture a 1:1, b 3:2, c 7:3, d 4:1 and e 9:1. Corresponding standard deviation (SD) values in nanometer are provided in each image

The variation in uniformity of the nanofibers obtained from different solvent proportions can be identified from the standard deviation values. This was an interesting observation that the average diameter and non-uniformity increased with decrease of DMF concentration. The large dipole moment possessed by the solvent DMF helps to maintain a high charge density to overcome the surface tension exerted in the polymer jet [34]. Volatile solvent like DCM supports faster dehydration of the nanofibrous mat deposited on the target [49]. So PC solution with higher proportion of DCM caused the formation of non-uniform fibers with large average diameter. The solution viscosities and conductivities of 14 w/v% PC in different solvent proportions are provided in Table 1.

Table 1

Solution viscosities and conductivities of PC with different DCM–DMF proportions

DCM–DMF ratio	Viscosity (cP)	Conductivity (µS)
1:1	52.3	3.53
3:2	59.1	3.12
7:3	66.7	2.69
4:1	78.9	1.88
9:1	82.1	0.92

With the increase of DCM content in the solvent mixture, solution viscosity increased gradually. Meantime the solution conductivity decreased with increase of DCM content in the mixture. The relation between viscosity of the PC solutions and the corresponding values of average diameters is in good agreement with various previous reports. With the increase of DMF content viscosity of the solution decreases and conductivity increases. All these factors together affected the final morphology of PC fibers including uniformity. The variation of average diameter of PC fibers with different solvent proportions is given in Fig. 8a.

Fig. 8

The variation of average fiber diameter with a solvent ratio, b applied voltage, c flow rate and d working distance

Variation in applied voltage

The SEM images and the corresponding histograms of PC fibers obtained by the electrospinning of 14 w/v% solution in 1:1 DCM–DMF mixture under different applied voltages are shown in Fig. 5. Other spinning parameters like flow rate and working distance were kept as 0.5 mL/h and 15 cm respectively. The standard deviation (SD) values of the average fiber diameter are shown in the histograms provided.

Fig. 5

a SEM image of PC fibers of 10 kV voltage. b Histogram of PC fibers of 10 kV voltage. c SEM image of PC fibers of 30 kV voltage and d histogram of PC fibers of 30 kV voltage. Corresponding standard deviation (SD) values in nanometer are provided in each image

Beaded but almost uniform fibers with average diameter of 137 nm were obtained under an applied voltage of 10 kV. Around 4% bead density was observed by the analysis of the SEM image using Image J software. Surface morphology of PC fibers under 20 kV applied voltage was already studied and the SEM image and histogram are provided in Figs. 3a and 4a, respectively. Under an applied voltage of 30 kV, beadless fibers were formed with slightly non uniform appearance with an average diameter of 382 nm.

An optimum potential was found to be suitable for obtaining uniform beadless fibers with least average diameter. An applied voltage of 10 kV was not sufficient to overcome the surface tension of the polymer solution which results beads on fibers. Applied voltage is an important parameter that has direct influence on the fluid mechanics. Stretching and acceleration of the polymer jet depend on the applied voltage that subsequently influence final fiber morphology. Low electrical conductivity of a solution results beaded fibers due to insufficient polymer jet elongation. There were reports on the decrease in average fiber diameter with increase in electrical conductivity of the solution. Very large applied voltage often results multiple jet formation and subsequently non uniform fibers [50]. The stretching of the polymer jet under the application of a high voltage has also reduced bead formation [51]. The variation of average diameter of the PC fibers with applied voltage is shown in Fig. 8b.

Variation in flow rate

Feed rate of the polymer solution during electrospinning is a prominent element for the shaping up of final morphology of the fibers. There were reports on the reduction of fiber diameter with decrease in flow rate [42]. The SEM images and the corresponding histograms of PC fibers obtained by the electrospinning of 14 w/v% solution in 1:1 DCM–DMF mixture under different flow rates are shown in Fig. 6. Other spinning parameters like applied voltage and working distance were kept as 20 kV and 15 cm, respectively.

Fig. 6

a SEM image of PC fibers of 1 mL/h flow rate. b Histogram of PC fibers of 1 mL/h flow rate. c SEM image of PC fibers of 1.5 mL/h flow rate and d histogram of PC fibers of 1.5 mL/h flow rate [standard deviation (SD) values are provided]

Almost uniform but beaded fibers with average diameters of 178 and 236 nm were obtained for 1 and 1.5 mL/h flow rates respectively. Surface morphology of PC fibers under a flow rate of 0.5 mL/h was already studied and the SEM image and histogram are provided in Figs. 3a and 4a, respectively. Large spindle shaped beads were observed for the fibers obtained under a flow rate of 1.5 mL/h. Approximate bead densities of 8 and 11% were observed for the PC fibers formed under the flow rates of 1 and 1.5 mL/h, respectively. Bead formation was due to the net result of various factors during electrospinning. High flow rates were found to be not suitable for a 14 w/v% PC solution in 1:1 DCM–DMF mixture under an applied potential of 20 kV and a working distance of 15 cm to get defect free nanofibers. The polymer jet could not get enough time for complete evaporation of solvents before depositing on the target under such a high flow rate [52]. The variation of average diameter of PC fibers with the variation of flow rate is shown in Fig. 8c.

Variation in needle tip-collector distance

The distance between the needle tip and the metallic collection plate (working distance) is another important parameter that influences electrospinning of polymer solutions. The selection of an appropriate working distance depends on the type of the polymer, solution and spinning parameters. Variation of the surface morphology of the fibers obtained by changing the needle tip-collector distance was investigated by SEM analysis. SEM images and the corresponding histograms with the standard deviation values of average diameter are provided in Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

a SEM image of PC fibers of 10 cm working distance. b Histogram of PC fibers of 10 cm working distance. c SEM image of PC fibers of 20 cm working distance and d histogram of PC fibers of 20 cm working distance [standard deviation (SD) values are provided]

There was considerable difference in the fiber morphology with respect to the needle tip-collection plate distance. Working distances of 10 and 20 cm have generated beaded fibers from a 14 w/v% PC solution in 1:1 DCM–DMF mixture under an applied voltage of 20 kV and flow rate of 0.5 mL/h. Non-uniform fibers with average diameters of 136 and 238 nm were obtained at working distances 10 and 20 cm respectively. An intermediate working distance of 15 cm was found to be most suitable for the production of uniform beadless fibers of least average diameter and the SEM image and histogram are shown in Figs. 3a and 4a respectively. Insufficient evaporation at a smaller distance was the reason for the formation of beads on fibers at a distance of 10 cm. Early drying of the polymer jet may be the reason for the increase in average diameter and bead formation at a distance of 20 cm. At the same time the distance tends to change the areal density due to the variation of the spread of fibers [26]. Figure 8 is given for the comparison of variation of average diameter of fibers produced under different solution and spinning parameters. Figure 8d represents the variation of average diameter of PC fibers under different working distances.

Water contact angles are useful for the determination of wettability of polymer materials. The sessile drop method was adopted using 0.03 μL water for a sample. The water contact angles of the PC fibers prepared with different solvent proportions, flow rate and needle tip-collector distance are shown in Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Water contact angles of PC fibers prepared under different parameters a 1:1, b 3:2, c 7:3, d 4:1 and e 9:1 solvent ratios, f 1 mL/h and g 1.5 mL/h flow rates, h 10 kV and i 30 kV voltages, j 10 cm and k 20 cm working distances

The electrospun PC fibers exhibit hydrophobic characteristics with slight variation in the water contact angle values. It was observed that the hydrophobic character was maximum for the PC fibers with least average diameter. The surface roughness of a material with lyophilic groups on the surface is inversely related to the water contact angle [53]. Superhydrophobic porous polymer membranes were reported to have high oil/water filtration efficiency [54]. PC nanofibers prepared in the solvents DCM and DMF under different solution and spinning parameters with corresponding average fiber diameter and contact angle values are given in Table 2.

Under a thorough investigation of various spinning and solution parameters on the surface morphology and average diameter of the fibers an important information was drawn. 14 w/v% PC in 1:1 DCM–DMF mixture under an applied voltage of 20 kV, flow rate 0.5 mL/h and needle tip-collector distance of 15 cm were the most favorable parameters for obtaining beadless and uniform fibers with least average diameter.

Indoor air pollution analysis

Polymer fiber mat with ultrafine morphology was reported to have large surface area that enables efficient adsorption of particulate matter. PC fiber mat prepared by electrospinning method has superior air and water filtration ability. By the decrease of fiber diameter adsorption capability increases due to the increase of surface area. Electrospinning of 14 w/v% PC in 1:1 DCM–DMF mixture deposited as a fiber mat which exactly functions like a filtration membrane.

The fiber mat was introduced over the slit in between the analysis chamber and the external hood of the particle dust analyzer. Particulate matter formed by the burning of firewood, coconut husk and coconut shell on a 4 h busy time period was used for the investigation of indoor air pollution. The glass fiber filter paper was exposed to fume with and without placing the PC fiber mat. Weights of the glass fiber filter paper before and after the experiment were taken. The photographs of the glass filter papers without and with using the fiber mat are shown in Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Glass filter papers used for particulate matter adsorption a plane filter paper, b filter paper without using PC fiber mat and c filter paper with fiber mat separation

The color difference of the glass fiber filter papers with and without placing the PC fiber mat in the dust analyzer shows the extent of adsorption of the air pollutants by the fiber mat. The dark color at the exposed surface of glass fiber filter paper without the use of fiber mat shows a 2 h continuous direct exposure (Fig. 10b). But color over the glass filter paper used with the fiber mat was reduced very much due to the adsorption of particulate matter by the fiber mat barrier (Fig. 10c). Filtration efficiency of the fiber mat is directly related to reduction in adsorption of particulate matter by the glass fiber filter paper. This was calculated using the formula: where V is the volume of air sampled in m3, Q is the average flow rate in m3/minute and T the total sampling time in minute. The flow rate of air was measured as 1.5 m3 per minute for 2 h.

Mass concentration of the particulate matter less than 10 micron (PM10) diameter was calculated by the equation: where PM10 is particulate matter less than 10 micron diameter (aerodynamic diameter) and unit of mass concentration of PM10 is μg/m3. Wi is the initial weight and Wf the final weight of glass filter paper in g. Mass concentration of PM10, average mass of PM10 and filtration efficiency of PC nanofiber mats with different thickness are provided in Table 3.

Table 3

Mass concentration of PM10, average mass of PM10 and filtration efficiency of PC nanofiber mats with different thickness

Filtration experiment	Mass of PM10 (µg/m3)		Average mass of PM10 (µg/m3)	Filtration efficiency (%)
	1	2
Without using PC fiber mat	1120	1188	1154
PC fiber mat with 1.64 mm thickness (one layer)	124.43	124.21	124.32	89.22
PC fiber mat with 3.16 mm thickness (two layer)	95.70	93.54	94.62	91.80
PC fiber mat with 4.33 mm thickness (three layer)	80	81.66	80.83	93
PC fiber mat with 5.72 mm thickness (four layer)	80.09	79.56	79.82	93.08

From the weights of glass fiber filter papers, the mass concentrations of the particulate matter deposited for 2 h time period with and without using fiber mat and their mean values were calculated. Finally the reduction in the deposited particulate matter was calculated from the average PM10 values. A single layer of PC fiber mat with thickness 1.64 mm has a filtration efficiency of 89.22%. Filtration efficiency was found to increase with increase in the number of layers of PC fiber mat. But there was not much difference in the filtration efficiency of three layer and four layer fiber mats. A maximum of 93% filtration efficiency was observed for PC fiber mats with 4.33 and 5.72 mm thickness. It was clearly established that the PC fiber mat acts as an efficient filter for the particulate matter passing through it. This is also worth to mention that the adsorbed particulate matter coming under a hazardous class with size less than 10 microns. The images of the PC fiber mat before and after adsorption of particulate matter are provided in Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

PC fiber mat a before and b after adsorption of particulate matter

The entire surface of the fiber mat was covered by particulate matter including carbon. The fiber mat did not exhibit any sign of degradation. The degree of adsorption of particulate matter on the PC nanofiber mat was further investigated with the help of SEM analysis. The SEM images of the fibers with various magnifications are provided in Fig. 12.

Fig. 12

SEM images of PC nanofiber mat after particulate matter adsorption with different magnifications a ×30, b ×100, c ×500 and d ×5000

The micrographs show that particulate matter below 10 micron was almost adsorbed and covered over the entire surface of the nanofiber mat. It was observed that PC fiber mat with least average diameter has superior particulate matter adsorption property. Such a material could successfully deliver large surface area for minute particulate adsorption.

Conclusion

The attractive properties of polycarbonate has been utilized constructively by molding it into a versatile material with large surface to volume ratio. This was done by a systematic and a novel method by the optimization of solution and electrospinning parameters. A 14 w/v% PC was selected as the most suitable concentration from our previous research work. Suitable solvent proportion was picked from a list of different proportions of solvents with the help of electrospinning process. The selection of a solvent which has high volatility and another solvent which has large dielectric constant and dipole moment, helped to create a highly manageable electrospinning atmosphere. The interesting observation was that a solvent mixture with equal amount of these two solvents, resulted fibers which has least average diameter. Multiple experiments were conducted by varying different parameters such as the applied voltage, flow rate and needle tip-collector distance for the electrospinning of 14 w/v% PC in 1:1 DCM–DMF mixture, and collected associated valuable information with each experiment. It is observed that a proper evaporation of the solvent and drying of the polymer jet are essential for the formation of beadless and uniform ultrafine fibers. A very low flow rate of 0.5 mL/h, medium applied potential of 20 kV and a needle tip-collector distance of 15 cm were found to be the highly favorable spinning conditions. A ‘14 w/v% PC in 1:1 DCM–DMF mixture’ under the above spinning parameters has successfully generated a uniform layer of nanofibers with average diameter 90 nm. The PC nanofiber mat exhibited excellent particulate matter adsorption capability in indoor air pollution monitoring experiment. The efficiency of the PC fiber mat was monitored by a continuous 2 h indoor air sample exposure. There was 93% reduction in the adsorption of particulate matter by the glass filter paper which indicates a superior filtration efficiency of the PC fiber mat with least average diameter. In the current environmental challenges this would be definitely a supportive finding in the field of air quality assessment and purification.