| Literature DB >> 32836380 |
Sumethee Songsamoe1,2, Phanit Koomhin3,2, Narumol Matan1,2.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to develop antifungal fragrant brown rice using the vapour phase of Michelia alba oil and to understand the effects of fragrant brown rice on consumer reactions using an electroencephalography (EEG) technique. The effect of M. alba oil vapour (300-900 µL/L) on the growth of moulds was studied in brown rice. Then, optimisation of the M. alba oil vapour (300-900 µL/L) was studied through sensory evaluation. Next, EEG was used to investigate the effect of fragrant cooked brown rice on human brain activity. In addition, the key components of M. alba oil on the sensory effects were determined. The results indicated that M. alba oil vapour ≥ 450 µL/L provided effective antifungal activity against natural moulds on brown rice for at least 90 days of storage at 25 °C at 100% RH. Furthermore, the optimal concentration of M. alba oil vapour for enhancing consumer preference and acceptance of cooked brown rice was 300-600 µL/L with a rejection threshold of 2,052 µL/L. Moreover, it was found that linalool was the main key component and caryophyllene and β-elemene were the minor components affecting the sensory quality enhancement. Interestingly, the EEG results showed that fragrant cooked brown rice could increase the power of alpha and beta waves in the human brain, indicating anti-stress effects and a relaxed mood. Therefore, M. alba oil vapour demonstrated good potential to enhance consumer acceptance and preference for cooked brown rice while controlling the significant growth of moulds in brown rice. © Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2020.Entities:
Keywords: Antifungal; Electroencephalography; Fragrant brown rice; Michelia alba oil vapour; Sensory
Year: 2020 PMID: 32836380 PMCID: PMC7408972 DOI: 10.1007/s13197-020-04689-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Food Sci Technol ISSN: 0022-1155 Impact factor: 2.701
Fig. 1EEG recording showing the procedure of the baseline, smelling, mouthing, after swallowing and 5 min after swallowing steps at 2-min intervals
The effect of cooked brown rice treated with M. alba oil vapour on consumer acceptance
| Treatments | 9 point hedonic scale | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odour | Taste | Flavour | Overall | |
| 6.8 ± 1.5a | 6.9 ± 1.4a | 6.8 ± 1.3a | 7.1 ± 1.3a | |
| 6.6 ± 1.4a | 6.5 ± 1.6ab | 6.5 ± 1.4ab | 6.7 ± 1.5b | |
| 6.5 ± 1.5a | 6.6 ± 1.5ab | 6.5 ± 1.6a | 6.9 ± 1.4a | |
| 6.4 ± 1.8a | 6.2 ± 1.8b | 6.0 ± 1.8bc | 6.3 ± 1.7ab | |
| 6.3 ± 1.7a | 6.1 ± 1.8b | 6.0 ± 1.9c | 6.3 ± 1.7ab | |
| Control | 5.9 ± 1.6b | 6.0 ± 1.6b | 5.9 ± 1.5c | 6.1 ± 1.4c |
a−cDifferent superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05)
The components presented in M. alba oil, brown rice grain samples and cooked brown rice samples
| Component | R.T | Peak area (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brown rice grain | Cooked brown rice | |||
| Methyl-2-butan-1-ol | 5.61 | 0.16 | – | – |
| Methyl 2-methylbutyrate | 6.19 | 4.05 | 9.98 | – |
| Ethyl 2-methylbutyrate | 7.25 | 0.36 | – | – |
| Ethyl 3-methylbutanoate | 7.30 | 0.15 | – | – |
| Methyl 2-methylcrotonate | 7.52 | 0.23 | – | – |
| Methylethylacetic acid | 8.23 | 1.55 | 9.21 | – |
| α-Pinene | 8.71 | 0.24 | 0.11 | – |
| (-)-camphene | 8.98 | 0.11 | – | – |
| Hexanoic acid | 9.94 | 0.06 | – | – |
| β-Pinene | 9.43 | 0.48 | 0.22 | – |
| β-Myrcene | 9.52 | 0.12 | – | – |
| o-Cymene | 10.13 | 0.07 | – | – |
| 1,5-Cyclooctadiene, 1,5-dimethyl- | 10.21 | 0.19 | – | – |
| β-cis-Ocimene | 10.27 | 2.94 | 1.61 | 2.14 |
| 3-Carene | 10.45 | 2.84 | 1.42 | 2.36 |
| γ-Terpinene | 10.66 | 0.07 | – | – |
| Ethyl 2-(5-methyl-5-vinyltetrahydrofuran-2-yl) propan-2-yl carbonate | 10.88 | 0.26 | 0.16 | – |
| Cyclohexene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethylidene)- | 11.12 | 0.19 | – | – |
| Linalool | 11.46 | 43.47 | 52.07 | 11.32 |
| Phenylethyl alcohol | 11.68 | 0.69 | – | – |
| endo-Borneol | 12.41 | 0.18 | – | – |
| Terpinen-4-ol | 12.54 | 0.20 | – | – |
| α-Terpineol | 12.72 | 1.29 | 1.10 | - |
| Anisole, p-allyl- | 12.77 | 0.16 | 0.08 | – |
| Nerol | 13.45 | 0.56 | 0.14 | – |
| Linalool oxide acetate | 13.92 | 0.20 | 0.10 | – |
| Safrole | 14.04 | 0.10 | – | – |
| 1H-indole | 14.11 | 0.09 | – | – |
| δ-Elemene | 14.70 | 0.15 | 0.12 | – |
| α-Cubebene | 14.86 | 0.34 | 0.30 | – |
| Eugenol | 14.89 | – | 0.12 | 5.66 |
| Cycloisosativene | 15.19 | 0.09 | – | – |
| Copaene | 15.27 | 1.40 | 0.92 | 3.83 |
| β-Elemene | 15.48 | 8.03 | 9.76 | 34.38 |
| cis-α-Bergamotene | 15.76 | 0.21 | 0.34 | 1.43 |
| α-Santalene | 15.86 | 0.23 | – | – |
| Caryophyllene | 16.01 | 6.80 | 4.90 | 19.58 |
| Bicyclosesquiphellandrene | 16.06 | 0.16 | – | – |
| α-Guaiene | 16.11 | 0.16 | – | – |
| (E)-β-Famesene | 16.17 | 0.20 | – | – |
| Cadina-3,5-diene | 16.36 | 0.13 | – | – |
| 1,4,7, -Cycloundecatriene, 1,5,9,9-tetramethyl-, Z, Z, Z- | 16.46 | 1.71 | 1.23 | 5.30 |
| γ-Muurolene | 16.55 | 0.10 | – | – |
| Methyl isoeugenol | 16.85 | 3.30 | – | – |
| β-Selinene | 16.95 | 4.00 | 3.54 | 5.74 |
| 1R,4R,7R,11R-1,3,4,7 Tetramethyltricyclo [5.3.1.0(4,11)] undec-2-ene | 17.05 | 2.25 | – | – |
| Eremophila-1(10),11-diene | 17.14 | 0.31 | – | – |
| γ-Cadinene | 17.27 | 0.21 | – | – |
| δ-Cadinene | 17.38 | 3.30 | 1.37 | 5.96 |
| Nerolidol | 17.79 | 0.74 | – | – |
| α-Calacorene | 18.01 | 0.08 | – | – |
| Caryophyllene oxide | 18.45 | 0.70 | 0.26 | 0.94 |
| Isoaromadendrene epoxide | 18.66 | 0.08 | – | – |
| Isospathulenol | 18.78 | 0.09 | – | – |
| Cubenol (1,10 di-epi) | 19.06 | 0.53 | – | – |
| τ-Muurolol | 19.27 | 0.93 | – | – |
| α-Cadinol | 19.48 | 0.27 | – | – |
| Neointermedeol | 19.56 | 0.52 | – | – |
| Spatulenol | 19.74 | 0.28 | – | – |
| 6-(1-Hydroxymethylvinyl)-4,8a-dimethyl-3,5,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-1H-naphthalen-2-one | 19.94 | 0.09 | – | – |
| (1R,7S, E)-7-Isopropyl-4,10-dimethylenecyclodec-5-enol | 21.05 | 0.09 | – | – |
| Bicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene, 1,5-dimethyl-3-hydroxy-8-(1-methylene-2-hydroxyethyl-1)- | 21.36 | 0.09 | – | – |
| 9-Cycloheptadecen-1-one, (Z)- | 22.78 | 0.24 | – | – |
| Linoleic acid ethyl ester | 22.90 | 0.25 | – | – |
| Nonadecane | 23.19 | 0.10 | – | – |
| Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester | 23.65 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.62 |
| Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester | 24.81 | – | 0.77 | 0.74 |
| 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, methyl ester | 26.59 | 0.22 | – | – |
| 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, methyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)- | 26.70 | 0.11 | – | – |
| Total | 99.62 | 100 | 100 | |
The physical and chemical properties of brown rice treated and untreated with M. alba oil vapour
| Quality factors | Brown rice samples | |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Treatment with | |
| Cooking time (min) | 27.57 ± 0.29a | 25.08 ± 0.50b |
| Colour | ||
| L* | 65.97 ± 0.55a | 63.65 ± 0.21b |
| a* | 3.64 ± 0.11a | 3.81 ± 0.16a |
| b* | 21.72 ± 0.15a | 22.47 ± 0.15a |
| ΔE* | 2.54 ± 0.63 | |
| Texture analysis | ||
| Hardness (N) | 292.24 ± 12.90a | 171.21 ± 5.63b |
| Springiness (mm) | 4.64 ± 0.04a | 4.54 ± 0.13a |
| Cohesiveness | 0.18 ± 0.07a | 0.20 ± 0.07a |
| Adhesiveness (N) | 4.69 ± 2.67a | 3.81 ± 1.91b |
| Gumminess (N) | 52.25 ± 15.94a | 34.32 ± 12.97b |
| Proximate composition (% wt) | ||
| Moisture (%) | 15.33 ± 0.05a | 15.64 ± 0.05a |
| Total protein (% | 7.25 ± 0.05a | 7.31 ± 0.04a |
| Lipids content (%) | 2.36 ± 0.05a | 2.28 ± 0.04a |
| Ash (%) | 1.17 ± 0.04a | 1.18 ± 0.01a |
| Crude fiber (%) | 0.40 ± 0.03a | 0.35 ± 0.01a |
| Total carbohydrate (%) | 73.49 ± 1.51a | 73.24 ± 1.49 a |
| Total phenolic content (mg gallic acid/g) | 0.50 ± 0.01b | 0.82 ± 0.01a |
a,bDifferent superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05)
Fig. 2Spectral analysis of human brain waves in the alpha and beta wave ranges from cooked brown rice consumption. The dashed line was adjusted to 100% from eye-close wave power without stimulus (baseline) prior to testing conditions
Power of slow–fast alpha and low-mid-high beta waves during and after consumption of cooked brown rice
| Step | Frequency (Hz) | Power (µV2) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated brown rice | Treated brown rice | |||||
| Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM | |||
| Smelling odour | 9 | 0.0903 | 0.0072 | 0.1521 | 0.0124 | < 0.0001 |
| 12 | 0.1037 | 0.0066 | 0.0735 | 0.0048 | 0.4457 | |
| 14 | 0.0237 | 0.0020 | 0.0252 | 0.0014 | 0.5059 | |
| 17 | 0.0245 | 0.0014 | 0.0198 | 0.0010 | 0.9416 | |
| 25 | 0.0174 | 0.0014 | 0.0109 | 0.0007 | 0.8807 | |
| Mouthing | 9 | 0.1104 | 0.0109 | 0.1135 | 0.0090 | < 0.0001 |
| 12 | 0.0954 | 0.0095 | 0.0894 | 0.0070 | 0.4817 | |
| 14 | 0.0274 | 0.0017 | 0.0218 | 0.0016 | < 0.0001 | |
| 17 | 0.0218 | 0.0011 | 0.0179 | 0.0010 | < 0.0001 | |
| 25 | 0.0124 | 0.0006 | 0.0123 | 0.0009 | 0.0803 | |
| After swallowing | 9 | 0.1314 | 0.0100 | 0.1519 | 0.0166 | 0.2189 |
| 12 | 0.1288 | 0.0102 | 0.1029 | 0.0113 | 0.0003 | |
| 14 | 0.0214 | 0.0013 | 0.0409 | 0.0032 | 0.0224 | |
| 17 | 0.0188 | 0.0010 | 0.0189 | 0.0009 | 0.7411 | |
| 25 | 0.0095 | 0.0005 | 0.0134 | 0.0007 | < 0.0001 | |
| After swallowing 5 min | 9 | 0.0916 | 0.0076 | 0.0940 | 0.0068 | 0.0347 |
| 12 | 0.0837 | 0.0061 | 0.0713 | 0.0043 | 0.1613 | |
| 14 | 0.0159 | 0.0007 | 0.0211 | 0.0010 | 0.1195 | |
| 17 | 0.0169 | 0.0008 | 0.0150 | 0.0007 | 0.1909 | |
| 25 | 0.0131 | 0.0007 | 0.0127 | 0.0008 | 0.1028 | |