| Literature DB >> 32835727 |
Yiren Yue1, Sida Li1, Zhuojia Qian1, Renalison Farias Pereira1, Jonghwa Lee2, Jeffery J Doherty2, Zhenyu Zhang1, Ye Peng1, John M Clark2, Alicia R Timme-Laragy3, Yeonhwa Park4.
Abstract
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS), a shorter chain Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) cognate of perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), has been used as replacement for the toxic surfactant PFOS. However, emerging evidences suggest safety concerns for PFBS and its effect on reproductive health is still understudied. Therefore, the current work aimed to investigate the effect of PFBS, in comparison to PFOS, on reproductive health using Caenorhabditis elegans as an in vivo animal model. PFOS (≥10 μM) and PFBS (≥1000 μM) significantly impaired the reproduction capacity of C. elegans, represented as reduced brood size (total egg number) and progeny number (hatched offspring number), without affecting the hatchability. Additionally, the preconception exposure of PFOS and PFBS significantly altered the embryonic nutrient loading and composition, which further led to abnormalities in growth rate, body size and locomotive activity in F1 offspring. Though the effective exposure concentration of PFBS was approximately 100 times higher than PFOS, the internal concentration of PFBS was lower than that of PFOS to produce the similar effects of PFOS. In conclusion, PFOS and PFBS significantly impaired the reproductive capacities in C. elegans and the preconception exposure of these two compounds can lead to offspring physiological dysfunctions.Entities:
Keywords: Caenorhabditis elegans; PFBS; PFOS; Reproductive toxicity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32835727 PMCID: PMC7554236 DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111695
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Chem Toxicol ISSN: 0278-6915 Impact factor: 6.023