Literature DB >> 32835638

Mobile Device Usage by Gender Among High-Risk HIV Individuals in a Rural, Resource-Limited Setting.

Breanna R Campbell1, Koeun Choi2, Megan Gray Neils1, Chelsea Canan1, Anthony Moll3, Rebecca Dillingham1, Sheela V Shenoi2.   

Abstract

Background: Mobile health (mHealth) is a promising tool to deliver healthcare interventions to underserved populations. We characterized the use of mobile devices in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa to tailor mHealth interventions for people living with HIV and at risk for acquiring HIV in the middle-income country.
Methods: We surveyed participants in community settings and offered free HIV counseling and testing. Participants self-reported their gender, age, relationship, and employment status, receipt of monthly grant, condomless sex frequency, and circumcision status (if male). Outcomes included cell phone and smartphone ownership, private data access, health information seeking, and willingness to receive healthcare messages. We performed multivariable logistic regression to assess the relationship between demographic factors and outcomes.
Results: Although only 10% of the 788 individuals surveyed used the phone to seek health information, 93% of cell phone owners were willing to receive healthcare messages. Being young, female, employed, and in a relationship were associated with cell phone ownership. Smartphone owners were more likely to be young, female, and employed. Participants reporting condomless sex or lack of circumcision were significantly less likely to have private data access or to purchase data. Conclusions: mHealth interventions should be feasible in rural KwaZulu-Natal, though differ by gender. As women are more likely to own smartphones, smartphone-based mHealth interventions specifically geared to prevent the acquisition of or to support the care of HIV in young women in KwaZulu-Natal may be feasible. mHealth interventions encouraging condom use and medical male circumcision should consider the use of nonsmartphone short message service and be attuned to mobile data limitations-especially when targeting men.

Entities:  

Keywords:  global health; infectious disease; mHealth; smart phones; telemedicine

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32835638      PMCID: PMC8215405          DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Telemed J E Health        ISSN: 1530-5627            Impact factor:   5.033


  15 in total

Review 1.  Male circumcision: a globally relevant but under-utilized method for the prevention of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  Aaron A R Tobian; Seema Kacker; Thomas C Quinn
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 13.739

2.  Improved Medication Adherence and Frequency of Blood Glucose Self-Testing Using an m-Health Platform Versus Usual Care in a Multisite Randomized Clinical Trial Among People with Type 2 Diabetes in India.

Authors:  Nora J Kleinman; Avani Shah; Sanjiv Shah; Sanjeev Phatak; Vijay Viswanathan
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.536

Review 3.  The effectiveness of e-& mHealth interventions to promote physical activity and healthy diets in developing countries: A systematic review.

Authors:  Andre Matthias Müller; Stephanie Alley; Stephanie Schoeppe; Corneel Vandelanotte
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 6.457

4.  mHealth Interventions in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kathryn Hurt; Rebekah J Walker; Jennifer A Campbell; Leonard E Egede
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2016-09-01

5.  Integrated Tuberculosis/Human Immunodeficiency Virus Community-Based Case Finding in Rural South Africa: Implications for Tuberculosis Control Efforts.

Authors:  Sheela V Shenoi; Anthony P Moll; Ralph P Brooks; Tassos Kyriakides; Laurie Andrews; Teja Kompala; Devesh Upadhya; Frederick L Altice; Francois J Eksteen; Gerald Friedland
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.835

6.  Does short message service improve focused antenatal care visit and skilled birth attendance? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Fasil Wagnew; Getenet Dessie; Animut Alebel; Henok Mulugeta; Yihalem Abebe Belay; Amanuel Alemu Abajobir
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.223

7.  Factors hindering effective uptake of medical male circumcision at Untunjambili area in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Authors:  Promise N Sangweni; Thandisizwe R Mavundla; Pule S Moabi
Journal:  Health SA       Date:  2019-10-10

Review 8.  Using mHealth to Improve Usage of Antenatal Care, Postnatal Care, and Immunization: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Jessica L Watterson; Julia Walsh; Isheeta Madeka
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  The MomConnect helpdesk: how an interactive mobile messaging programme is used by mothers in South Africa.

Authors:  Khou Xiong; Joy Kamunyori; Jane Sebidi
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2018-04-24

10.  Requiring smartphone ownership for mHealth interventions: who could be left out?

Authors:  Krishna K Bommakanti; Laramie L Smith; Lin Liu; Diana Do; Jazmine Cuevas-Mota; Kelly Collins; Fatima Munoz; Timothy C Rodwell; Richard S Garfein
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.