| Literature DB >> 32834825 |
Xiao-Hong Jiang1, Chao-Qian Li2, Guang-Yi Feng3, Ming-Jie Luo4, Qi-Xiang Sun5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mycobacterium vaccae nebulization imparted protective effect against allergic asthma in a mouse model. The TGF-β/Smad signal transduction pathway plays an important role in allergic bronchial asthma. However, the effect of M. vaccae nebulization on the TGF-β/Smad signal transduction pathway in mouse models of allergic asthma remains unclear. This study investigated the preventive effect of M. vaccae nebulization during bronchial asthma in a mouse model and elucidate the implication of TGF-β/Smad signal transduction pathway in the process.Entities:
Keywords: Bronchial asthma; Mycobacterium vaccae; Signal transduction; TGF-β
Year: 2020 PMID: 32834825 PMCID: PMC7386169 DOI: 10.1186/s13223-020-00456-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol ISSN: 1710-1484 Impact factor: 3.406
Fig. 1Experimental protocol. M. vaccae: Mycobacterium vaccae; Neb.: nebulization
Fig. 2Airway responsiveness results. #P < 0.01, compared with Asthma control group
Total cell count and cell classification count
| Group | Total cells (×107/L) | Percentages in total cells (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eosinophils | Lymphocytes | Neutrophils | Monocytes | ||
| Normal group | 3.00 ± 0.53 | 1.13 ± 0.52 | 11.19 ± 2.09 | 14.13 ± 1.92 | 73.56 ± 3.04 |
| Asthma control group | 21.25 ± 3.07# | 11.75 ± 1.71# | 19.69 ± 2.76# | 16.56 ± 2.68 | 52.00 ± 2.89 |
| 12.69 ± 2.94## | 6.25 ± 1.36## | 12.81 ± 1.73## | 13.56 ± 1.27 | 67.38 ± 3.42 | |
#P < 0.01 compared with Normal group; ##P < 0.01 compared with Asthma control group
Fig. 3Cells count in BALF. #P < 0.01, compared with Normal group; ##P < 0.01. compared with Asthma control group
Fig. 4HE staining and PAS staining results of the lung tissue (×200). The lungs in the normal control group mice showed complete airway epithelium mucosa, the cilia were ordered, the basilar membranes and smooth muscle were thin, there was no inflammatory cell infiltration around the vessels and airways, there were no mucus secretion (A1 and A2). In the asthma control group, there was cellular swelling of the airway epithelia, the plicae mucosae were increased, cilia were disordered, the bronchial mucous membranes were broken, many inflammatory cells infiltrated the bronchioles, the smooth muscle showed hyperplasia, PAS staining showed generous mucus and mucus plugs, (B1 and B2). In the M. vaccae prevention group, the airway lumen was unobstructed and the epithelia lined up inorder; PAS staining showed no mucus secretion (C1 and C2)
The semi quantitative results
| Group | Inflammatory cells* | Goblet cells# | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| Normal group | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asthma control group | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| 0 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
#P<0.01; *P<0.01. Kruskal–Wallis H Test
Fig. 5Immunohistochemistry results of pulmonary TGF-beta/Smad signaling pathway related protein expression (×400). A1–3 (Normal control group); B1–3 (Asthma control group); C1–3 (M. vaccae neb. group)
Pulmonary TGF-β/Smad signal transduction pathway related protein expression (IOD value)
| Group | n | TGF-β1 | TβR1 | Smad1 | Smad7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal group | 8 | 8.72 ± 2.37 | 7.50 ± 2.50 | 13.60 ± 4.43 | 82.81 ± 28.00 |
| Asthma control group | 8 | 32.52 ± 15.85# | 29.21 ± 4.73# | 38.01 ± 18.45# | 129.76 ± 54.20 |
| 8 | 11.74 ± 4.52* | 14.81 ± 4.79* | 16.23 ± 7.37* | 98.08 ± 35.14 |
#P<0.01, compared with Normal group; *P<0.01, compared with Asthma control group