| Literature DB >> 32834605 |
Ali Behnood1, Emadaldin Mohammadi Golafshani2, Seyedeh Mohaddeseh Hosseini3.
Abstract
Recently, anovel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has become a serious concern for global public health. Infectious disease outbreaks such as COVID-19 can also significantly affect the sustainable development of urban areas. Several factors such as population density and climatology parameters could potentially affect the spread of the COVID-19. In this study, a combination of the virus optimization algorithm (VOA) and adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) was used to investigate the effects of various climate-related factors and population density on the spread of the COVID-19. For this purpose, data on the climate-related factors and the confirmed infected cases by the COVID-19 across the U.S counties was used. The results show that the variable defined for the population density had the most significant impact on the performance of the developed models, which is an indication of the importance of social distancing in reducing the infection rate and spread rate of the COVID-19. Among the climatology parameters, an increase in the maximum temperature was found to slightly reduce the infection rate. Average temperature, minimum temperature, precipitation, and average wind speed were not found to significantly affect the spread of the COVID-19 while an increase in the relative humidity was found to slightly increase the infection rate. The findings of this research show that it could be expected to have slightly reduced infection rate over the summer season. However, it should be noted that the models developed in this study were based on limited one-month data. Future investigation can benefit from using more comprehensive data covering a wider range for the input variables.Entities:
Keywords: Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system; COVID-19;Climatology; Virus optimization algorithm
Year: 2020 PMID: 32834605 PMCID: PMC7315966 DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110051
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chaos Solitons Fractals ISSN: 0960-0779 Impact factor: 9.922
Examples of the ML techniques for the prediction of outbreak.
| Outbreak infection | ML technique | Main findings | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dengue | Naïve Bayes and adopted multi-regression | A high relative humidity accompanied with a temperature of 30-35 ˚C is a favorable condition for the spread of dengue. | |
| Dengue | Neural network | Integration ofremote sensing data, a ML technique and spatiotemporal analysis provided a climate-based predictive model with high accuracy for the spread of dengue. | |
| Oyster norovirus | Neural network | With 2-day lead time, the developed model can predict oyster norovirus outbreaks. | |
| Oyster norovirus | Genetic programming and neural network | Climate-related factors were found to play a significant role in the cause likelihood of oyster norovirus outbreaks. | [ |
| Oyster norovirus | Probability-based artificial neural network | Climate-related factors such as temperature, wind, salinity, and rainfall were found as the determinants of norovirus outbreaks. Moreover, depth of water in an oyster bed was found as the most significant factor in the developed model. | |
| Swine fever | Random forests | Precipitation and driest month had the most significant effects on the outbreak of African swine fever. | |
| Influenza | Neural network, random forests, support vector machine | The random forests time series provided better statistical fit than support vector machine and artificial neural network in modeling weekly influenza like illness. | |
| COVID-19 | Genetic programming | The predictive models based on genetic programming provide high accuracy in determining the factors that affect the infection rate of COVID-19. |
Fig. 1COVID-19 map by county [27].
Statistical indicators of the input and output variables.
| Input variables | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Statistical indicators | Population density | Average temperature | Maximum temperature | Minimum temperature | Precipitation | Wind speed | Humidity | Output variable Infection rate |
| Minimum | 1.4016 | 9.8000 | 19.6000 | -0.1000 | 0.0200 | 7.3000 | 63.3700 | 0.1266 |
| Maximum | 71340.6045 | 76.4000 | 86.4000 | 67.8000 | 10.7300 | 34.5000 | 87.4100 | 913.5435 |
| Average | 603.5411 | 9.4837 | 9.7883 | 9.2526 | 1.8044 | 2.1282 | 2.5300 | 15.2436 |
| Standard deviation | 2439.0458 | 11.1792 | 11.5296 | 10.9617 | 2.1978 | 2.8359 | 3.2920 | 55.1694 |
| Skewness | 19.3877 | 0.0355 | 0.0093 | 0.0552 | 0.4957 | 0.5096 | -0.3014 | 11.0189 |
| Kurtosis | 484.5741 | -0.7785 | -0.7959 | -0.7015 | -0.3631 | 2.5896 | 0.8900 | 140.0478 |
Fig. 2The relationship between the infection rate and the climatology variables.
Fig. 3The pairwise relationship between the climatology variables.
Fig. 4The Pseudo-code of the VOA.
Fig. 5An example of an ANFIS model with two input variables and two rules.
Fig. 6A schematic representation of a virus in the proposed model.
Fig. 7The flowchart of the proposed ANFIS-VOA method.
Statistical indicators of the developed models.
| Models | Statistical indicators | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMSD (Infected people/Days) | MAE (Infected people/Days) | R2 | R-value | |
| Linear regression | 43.0204 | 12.1912 | 0.3925 | 0.6257 |
| ANFIS | 30.6515 | 9.0127 | 0.6911 | 0.8314 |
| ANFIS-VOA-I | 27.6533 | 9.0494 | 0.7486 | 0.8653 |
| ANFIS-VOA-II | 22.4744 | 7.3337 | 0.8339 | 0.9132 |
Fig. 8.The relative importance of the climatology variables on the infection rate.
Fig. 9.The change trend of the infection rate by changing the climatology variables.