Literature DB >> 32833926

Is Reoperation Higher Than Expected after Below-the-knee Amputation? A Single-center Evaluation of Factors Associated with Reoperation at 1 Year.

Liam H Wong1, Erik Woelber2, Alden Wyland1, Jordan Arakawa1, Kenneth R Gundle2,3, Zachary M Working2, James E Meeker2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Below-the-knee amputation (BKA) is relatively common among patients with vascular disease, infection, trauma, or neoplastic disease. Many BKAs are performed in patients with incompletely treated medical comorbidities, and some are performed in patients with acute high-energy trauma or crush injuries, malignant neoplasm undergoing time-sensitive limb removal, and diabetes with active infection or sepsis. Consequently, revision is common. Prior studies of outcomes after BKA, including several based on the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database, have follow-up periods that do not cover the entire at-risk period. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the survivorship free from unplanned reoperation within 1 year of BKA? (2) What patient characteristics are associated with reoperation within 1 year of BKA?
METHODS: We retrospectively studied all BKAs performed by the orthopaedic surgery service at a Level 1 trauma center from 2008 to 2018, as identified by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Twenty-eight percent (38 of 138) underwent amputation as treatment for traumatic injury, 57% (79 of 138) for infection, and 15% (21 of 138) for malignancy. A total of 17% (23 of 138) had a final follow-up encounter before the 1-year study minimum, without differential loss to follow-up by surgical indication (p = 0.43) or hemoglobin A1c (p = 0.71). Median (range) follow-up was 570 days (6 to 3375). The primary outcome was survivorship from unplanned reoperation within 1 year of BKA index surgery or last planned reoperation, as determined by Kaplan-Meier estimation. Secondarily, we identified patient characteristics independently associated with reoperation within 1 year of BKA. Collected data included age, indication, BMI, diabetes, hemoglobin A1c level, closure method, and substance use. Unplanned reoperation was defined as irrigation and débridement, stump revision, or revision to a higher-level amputation; this did not include planned reoperations for BKAs closed in a staged manner. Factors associated with reoperation were determined using multivariate logistic regression analyses. All endpoints and variables related to patients and their surgical procedures were extracted from electronic medical records by someone other than the operating surgeon.
RESULTS: Using Kaplan-Meier estimation, 38% of patients (95% confidence interval 29 to 46) who underwent BKA had an unplanned reoperation within 1 year of their index surgery. Twelve percent of patients (95% CI 7 to 17) who underwent BKA did not reach 30 days with the limb survivorship free from unplanned reoperation. The median (range) time between the initial surgery and reoperation was 54 days (6 to 315). After controlling for potential confounding variables like age, gender, platelet count, albumin, and the reason for undergoing amputation, a hemoglobin A1c level greater than 8.1% (relative to A1c ≤ 8.1%) was the only variable independently associated with increased odds of reoperation (odds ratio 4.6 [95% CI 1.3 to 18.1]; p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: BKA carries a higher risk for reoperation than currently reported in studies that use 30-day postoperative follow-up periods. Clinicians should critically assess whether BKA is necessary, especially in patients with uncontrolled diabetes assessed by hyperglycemia. Before planned BKA, patients should have documented glycemic control to minimize the odds of reoperation. Because many of this study's limitations were due to its retrospective single center design, we recommend that future work cover a clinically appropriate surveillance period using a larger cohort such as a national database and/or employ a prospective design. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.
Copyright © 2020 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32833926      PMCID: PMC7899579          DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.755


  18 in total

1.  Rate of and Risk Factors for Intermediate-Term Reoperation After Ankle Fracture Fixation: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Daniel Pincus; Andrea Veljkovic; Thomas Zochowski; Nizar Mahomed; Darrell Ogilivie-Harris; David Wasserstein
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  Risk of revision of a total hip replacement in patients with diabetes mellitus: a population-based follow up study.

Authors:  A B Pedersen; F Mehnert; S P Johnsen; H T Sørensen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-07

3.  Unplanned return to theater: A quality of care and risk management index?

Authors:  N Pujol; J Merrer; B Lemaire; P Boisrenoult; P Desmoineaux; P Oger; C Lebas; P Beaufils
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.256

4.  Major lower extremity amputation: outcome of a modern series.

Authors:  Bernadette Aulivola; Chantel N Hile; Allen D Hamdan; Malachi G Sheahan; Jennifer R Veraldi; John J Skillman; David R Campbell; Sherry D Scovell; Frank W LoGerfo; Frank B Pomposelli
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2004-04

Review 5.  Diabetes and Healing Outcomes in Lower Extremity Fractures: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hilary Gortler; Jessyca Rusyn; Charles Godbout; Jas Chahal; Emil H Schemitsch; Aaron Nauth
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Survival rates in dysvascular lower limb amputees.

Authors:  J Kulkarni; S Pande; J Morris
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 6.071

7.  Functional outcomes following trauma-related lower-extremity amputation.

Authors:  Ellen J MacKenzie; Michael J Bosse; Renan C Castillo; Douglas G Smith; Lawrence X Webb; James F Kellam; Andrew R Burgess; Marc F Swiontkowski; Roy W Sanders; Alan L Jones; Mark P McAndrew; Brendan M Patterson; Thomas G Travison; Melissa L McCarthy
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Karel G M Moons; Douglas G Altman; Johannes B Reitsma; John P A Ioannidis; Petra Macaskill; Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew J Vickers; David F Ransohoff; Gary S Collins
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Preoperative hyperglycemia and complication risk following neurosurgical intervention: A study of 918 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Matthew C Davis; John E Ziewacz; Stephen E Sullivan; Abdulrahman M El-Sayed
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-05-14

10.  Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression.

Authors:  Zoran Bursac; C Heath Gauss; David Keith Williams; David W Hosmer
Journal:  Source Code Biol Med       Date:  2008-12-16
View more
  2 in total

1.  Factors Associated With Nonunion and Infection Following Ankle Arthrodesis Using a Large Claims Database: Who Has Elevated Risk?

Authors:  Liam H Wong; Bopha Chrea; James E Meeker; Jung U Yoo; Lara C Atwater
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2022-05-29

2.  CORR Insights®: Is Reoperation Higher Than Expected after Below-the-knee Amputation? A Single-center Evaluation of Factors Associated with Reoperation at 1 Year.

Authors:  Daniel J Stinner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.755

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.