Literature DB >> 3283380

Nuclear roundness factor measurement for assessment of prognosis of patients with prostatic carcinoma. II. Standardization of methodology for histologic sections.

J L Mohler1, A W Partin, J I Epstein, W D Lohr, D S Coffey.   

Abstract

A nuclear shape descriptor, nuclear roundness factor, predicted outcome in patients with prostatic carcinoma whereas standard pathological grading by Gleason's architectural pattern did not. The inability of others to duplicate those successes warranted a reevaluation of the technique for NRF measurement. We previously described our digitization system and measured the perimeter and area of a microscopic circle similar in size to prostatic carcinoma nuclei with a reproducibility and accuracy of greater than 95%. We have applied our improved system to nuclear contour digitization and standardized our method for NRF measurement. In order to calculate accurately the NRF for prostatic carcinoma, the histologic section must have been reviewed by a pathologist and 150 nuclei traced after random selection. NRF measurement reproducibility within and between observers exceeded 90%. This system for NRF measurement successfully predicted outcome in 13 of 15 patients with stages A2, B1, and B2 prostatic carcinoma. Our success with a carefully tested and improved system for NRF determination warrants further evaluation of NRF for assessment of prognosis of patients with prostatic carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3283380     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42792-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

Review 1.  Nuclear morphometry, nucleomics and prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Robert W Veltri; Christhunesa S Christudass; Sumit Isharwal
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in prostate cancer is associated with quantifiable changes in nuclear structure.

Authors:  James E Verdone; Princy Parsana; Robert W Veltri; Kenneth J Pienta
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 4.104

3.  Association between Nuclear Morphometry Parameters and Gleason Grade in Patients with Prostatic Cancer.

Authors:  Kamil Malshy; Gilad E Amiel; Dov Hershkovitz; Edmond Sabo; Azik Hoffman
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31

4.  Quantitative pathology: historical background, clinical research and application of nuclear morphometry and DNA image cytometry.

Authors:  Abdelbaset Buhmeida
Journal:  Libyan J Med       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 1.657

5.  Prognostic factors in prostate cancer.

Authors:  A Buhmeida; S Pyrhönen; M Laato; Y Collan
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 2.644

6.  Nuclear morphometry, epigenetic changes, and clinical relevance in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Robert W Veltri; Christhunesa S Christudass
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.622

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.