Literature DB >> 32833735

Variation Over Time and Factors Associated With Detection Rates of Sessile Serrated Lesion Across the United States: Results Form a National Sample Using the GIQuIC Registry.

Aasma Shaukat1, Jennifer Holub2, David Greenwald3, Glenn Eisen4, Colleen Schmitt5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) are important precursor lesions for the CpG island-methylated pathway to colorectal cancer. The reported detection rates of SSL are highly variable, and national or population-based estimates are not available. Patient-, provider-, and procedure-level factors associated with the detection rates of SSL have not been well described. The aim of our study was to study the detection rates of SSL, variability of rates over time, and factors associated with detection rates of SSL in a national sample of patients undergoing colonoscopy using the GIQuIC registry.
METHODS: We used colonoscopies submitted to the GIQuIC registry from 2014 to 2017 on adults, aged 18-89 years. Only the first colonoscopy record per patient was included. Indications for colonoscopy were categorized as screening, diagnostic, and surveillance. We used the hierarchical logistic models to study the factors associated with the detection rates of SSL. The Cochrane-Armitage test was used to study the significance of trend over time.
RESULTS: There were a total of 5,173,211 colonoscopies performed by 3,934 endoscopists during the study period. Among the 2,101,082 screening colonoscopies over the study period in adults older than or equal to 50 years that were complete to the cecum, the average detection rate per endoscopist for SSL was 6.43% (SD 5.18) and 6.25% standardized for the 2010 US population. There was a significant increase in the detection rates of SSLs from screening colonoscopies over the study period from 4.99% in 2014 to 7.09% in 2017 (P trend <0.001). Clinically significant factors associated with higher detection rates of SSL were longer withdrawal times (>11 minutes vs ≤6 minutes) (odds ratio [OR] 9.61; 9.03-10.24), adequate preparation (OR 1.25; 1.22-1.28), female sex (OR 1.17; 1.16-1.18), and use of a specialized gastrointestinal pathology group (OR 1.12; 95% confidence interval 1.04, 1.19). DISCUSSION: Population-based estimates of the detection rates of SSL are 6% and have increased over time.
Copyright © 2020 by The American College of Gastroenterology.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 32833735     DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  3 in total

1.  Almost One-Third of Large Sessile Serrated Polyps Are Missed on CT Colonography.

Authors:  Manish Singla; Jean D Kemp; Michael E Goldberg; Vito V Cirigliano; Gilda M Bobele; Ganesh R Veerappan; Patrick E Young
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 1.852

2.  Predictors of Incident Serrated Polyps: Results from a Large Multicenter Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Seth D Crockett; Elizabeth L Barry; Leila A Mott; Dale C Snover; Kristin Wallace; John A Baron
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.090

Review 3.  Post-polypectomy surveillance: the present and the future.

Authors:  Masau Sekiguchi; Takahisa Matsuda; Kinichi Hotta; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2022-07-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.