Literature DB >> 32833133

Postoperative effects of intra-alveolar application of 0.2% chlorhexidine or 1% hyaluronic acid bioadhesive gels after mandibular third molar extraction: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial.

D Muñoz-Cámara1, G Pardo-Zamora2, F Camacho-Alonso3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the postoperative effects of intra-alveolar applications of 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHL) or 1% hyaluronic (HA) acid bioadhesive gels following the extraction of mandibular impacted third molars (MITMs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial, 90 patients with one asymptomatic MITM were randomized into three group (n = 30 per group): group 1 (0.2% CHL), group 2 (1% HA), and group 3 (control). Visual analogue scales (VAS) were used to assess postoperative pain 24, 48, and 72 h and 7 days after surgery. Postsurgical complications were recorded: trismus, alveolitis osteitis, infection, or hematoma.
RESULTS: In order from least to greatest, postoperative pain at all evaluation times was 0.2% CHL < 1% HA < control. At 24 h, statistically significant differences were found between both study groups and the control groups (0.2% CHL/control: P = 0.001; 1% HA/control: P = 0.010). At 48 and 72 h, significant differences were only found between 0.2% CHL and the control group (P = 0.229 and P = 0.046, respectively). At 7 days, no significant differences were found between any groups. Comparing the incidence of postoperative trismus, alveolitis osteitis, infection, or hematoma, although complications were more frequent in the control group, no statistical differences between groups were found (P > 0.050).
CONCLUSIONS: Both 0.2% CHL and 1% HA bioadhesive gels applied intra-alveolarly minimize the postoperative complications after MITM extraction. Further research is necessary to confirm the present results. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study might help to reduce the postsurgical complications in patients after MITM extraction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chlorhexidine; Hyaluronic acid; Impacted tooth; Postoperative complications; Third molar

Year:  2020        PMID: 32833133     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03522-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  10 in total

1.  Effect on wound healing of a topical gel containing amino acid and sodium hyaluronate applied to the alveolar socket after mandibular third molar extraction: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Riccardo Guazzo; Egle Perissinotto; Sergio Mazzoleni; Sara Ricci; David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Stefano Sivolella
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.677

Review 2.  Complication in third molar extractions.

Authors:  V Candotto; L Oberti; F Gabrione; A Scarano; D Rossi; M Romano
Journal:  J Biol Regul Homeost Agents       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.711

Review 3.  Facial nerve paralysis after impacted lower third molar surgery: a literature review and case report.

Authors:  Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos; Ricardo Viana Bessa-Nogueira; Paul Edward Maurette; Suzana Célia Soares de Aguiar Carneiro
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2006-03-01

4.  Intra-alveolar chlorhexidine gel for the prevention of dry socket in mandibular third molar surgery. A pilot study.

Authors:  Daniel Torres-Lagares; Pedro Infante-Cossio; Jose Luis Gutierrez-Perez; Manuel Maria Romero-Ruiz; Manuel Garcia-Calderon; Maria Angeles Serrera-Figallo
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2006-03-01

Review 5.  Antibiotics to prevent complications following tooth extractions.

Authors:  Giovanni Lodi; Lara Figini; Andrea Sardella; Antonio Carrassi; Massimo Del Fabbro; Susan Furness
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-14

6.  Patients' satisfaction and prevalence of complications on surgical extraction of third molar.

Authors:  Crystal Ty Lee; Shinan Zhang; Yiu Yan Leung; Samantha Ky Li; Cissy C Tsang; Chun-Hung Chu
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.711

7.  The effects of a topical gel containing chitosan, 0,2% chlorhexidine, allantoin and despanthenol on the wound healing process subsequent to impacted lower third molar extraction.

Authors:  M Madrazo-Jiménez; Á Rodríguez-Caballero; M-Á Serrera-Figallo; R Garrido-Serrano; A Gutiérrez-Corrales; J-L Gutiérrez-Pérez; D Torres-Lagares
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2016-11-01

8.  Salivary myeloperoxidase and malondialdehyde are increased in patients exhibiting an asymptomatic mandibular impacted third molar.

Authors:  F Camacho-Alonso; M-R Tudela-Mulero; D Peñarrocha-Oltra; M Peñarrocha-Diago; J-C Balaguer-Martí; M Sánchez-Siles
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2019-07-01

Review 9.  Efficacy of amoxicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in the prevention of infection and dry socket after third molar extraction. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M-I Arteagoitia; L Barbier; J Santamaría; G Santamaría; E Ramos
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2016-07-01

10.  Effects of low-level laser therapy following surgical extraction of the lower third molar with objective measurement of swelling using a three-dimensional system.

Authors:  Mahmut Koparal; Ayse Ozcan Kucuk; Hilal Alan; Fatih Asutay; Mehmet Avci
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.447

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.