| Literature DB >> 32832552 |
Suofeng Sun1, Huijuan Zhang2, Yu Wang1,3, Jing Gao1, Shen Zhou1, Yuan Li4, Shuangyin Han1, Xiuling Li1, Jian Li1.
Abstract
Esophageal cancer (EC) is a type of extremely aggressive gastrointestinal cancer with high incidences in China and other Asian countries. EC does not have specific symptoms and is relatively easy to metastasize, which makes it difficult in early diagnosis. Thus, novel noninvasive diagnostic method is urgently needed in clinical practice. In this study, mass spectrometry with tandem mass tags and differential protein analysis were applied for identifying esophageal cancer-related proteins. The identified proteins were annotated based on their enrichment in Gene Ontology (GO) terms and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways. In addition, hierarchical clustering was applied based on differentially expressed proteins. As a result, a total of 5131 quantifiable proteins were identified from our liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with tandem mass tags (LC-MS/MS-TMT) method with 63 upregulated and 97 downregulated differential proteins between esophageal cancer and controlled normal samples. The differentially expressed proteins were highly enriched in GO terms associated with mitochondrial dissemble and apoptosis, and blood vessel regulation, and the upregulated differentially expressed proteins in EC samples were significantly enriched in major histocompatibility complex MHC-class I/II pathway of immune system. The functional clustering analysis revealed potential protein-protein interactions among tetraspanin, myosin, and S-100. In summary, our study provided a practical technological procedure of proteomic analysis for discovering novel biomarkers of a specific cancer type.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32832552 PMCID: PMC7429764 DOI: 10.1155/2020/5849323
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Overall design and protein identification. (a) Overall study design and analysis process. (b) Protein identification from 367174 secondary spectrograms. (c) PCA analysis between EC109 and EC109_T. (d) Boxplot of RSD distribution for protein quantification evaluation between replicates. (e) Differentially expressed protein analysis between EC tumor and control samples.
Figure 2Functional classification analysis of identified differentially expressed proteins. (a) The GO term annotation of quantitive DEP. (b) The distribution of subcellular location of differentially expressed protein. (c) Distribution of COG/KOG function classification.
Figure 3The distribution of differentially expressed proteins between esophageal cancer groups in functional enrichment of (a) biological process, (b) cellular component, (c) molecular function.
Figure 4Analysis of regulated protein structure domain (a) and KEGG pathway (b).
Figure 5Functional clustering of the KEGG pathway (a) and protein domain (b) analysis.