Literature DB >> 32831453

A Bayesian network approach to refining ecological risk assessments: Mercury and the Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi).

John F Carriger1, Mace G Barron2.   

Abstract

Traditionally hazard quotients (HQs) have been computed for ecological risk assessment, often without quantifying the underlying uncertainties in the risk estimate. We demonstrate a Bayesian network approach to quantitatively assess uncertainties in HQs using a retrospective case study of dietary mercury (Hg) risks to Florida panthers (Puma concolor coryi). The Bayesian network was parameterized, using exposure data from a previous Monte Carlo-based assessment of Hg risks (Barron et al., 2004. ECOTOX 13:223), as a representative example of the uncertainty and complexity in HQ calculations. Mercury HQs and risks to Florida panthers determined from a Bayesian network analysis were nearly identical to those determined using the prior Monte Carlo probabilistic assessment and demonstrated the ability of the Bayesian network to replicate conventional HQ-based approaches. Sensitivity analysis of the Bayesian network showed greatest influence on risk estimates from daily ingested dose by panthers and mercury levels in prey, and less influence from toxicity reference values. Diagnostic inference was used in a high-risk scenario to demonstrate the capabilities of Bayesian networks for examining probable causes for observed effects. Application of Bayesian networks in the computation of HQs provides a transparent and quantitative analysis of uncertainty in risks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian networks; Dynamic discretization; Florida panther; Mercury; Monte Carlo analysis; Terrestrial risk assessment

Year:  2020        PMID: 32831453      PMCID: PMC7433098          DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Modell        ISSN: 0304-3800            Impact factor:   2.974


  6 in total

1.  Retrospective and current risks of mercury to panthers in the Florida Everglades.

Authors:  Mace G Barron; Stephanie E Duvall; Kyle J Barron
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  The multiple stressor ecological risk assessment for the mercury-contaminated South River and upper Shenandoah River using the Bayesian network-relative risk model.

Authors:  Wayne G Landis; Kimberley K Ayre; Annie F Johns; Heather M Summers; Jonah Stinson; Meagan J Harris; Carlie E Herring; April J Markiewicz
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 2.992

3.  A Bayesian network for assessing the collision induced risk of an oil accident in the Gulf of Finland.

Authors:  Annukka Lehikoinen; Maria Hänninen; Jenni Storgård; Emilia Luoma; Samu Mäntyniemi; Sakari Kuikka
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Bayesian Networks Improve Causal Environmental Assessments for Evidence-Based Policy.

Authors:  John F Carriger; Mace G Barron; Michael C Newman
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Historical and other patterns of monomethyl and inorganic mercury in the Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi).

Authors:  J Newman; E Zillioux; E Rich; L Liang; C Newman
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  A screening level probabilistic risk assessment of mercury in Florida Everglades food webs.

Authors:  S E Duvall; M G Barron
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.291

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Bayesian Network Applications for Sustainable Holistic Water Resources Management: Modeling Opportunities for South Africa.

Authors:  Indrani Hazel Govender; Ullrika Sahlin; Gordon C O'Brien
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.302

2.  Increased Use of Bayesian Network Models Has Improved Environmental Risk Assessments.

Authors:  S Jannicke Moe; John F Carriger; Miriam Glendell
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 3.084

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.